Cargando…
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Many emergency ambulance calls are for older people who have fallen. As half of them are left at home, a community-based response may often be more appropriate than hospital attendance. The SAFER 1 trial will assess the costs and benefits of a new healthcare technology - hand-held comput...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2824628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20102616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-10-2 |
_version_ | 1782177706610262016 |
---|---|
author | Snooks, Helen Cheung, Wai-Yee Close, Jacqueline Dale, Jeremy Gaze, Sarah Humphreys, Ioan Lyons, Ronan Mason, Suzanne Merali, Yasmin Peconi, Julie Phillips, Ceri Phillips, Judith Roberts, Stephen Russell, Ian Sánchez, Antonio Wani, Mushtaq Wells, Bridget Whitfield, Richard |
author_facet | Snooks, Helen Cheung, Wai-Yee Close, Jacqueline Dale, Jeremy Gaze, Sarah Humphreys, Ioan Lyons, Ronan Mason, Suzanne Merali, Yasmin Peconi, Julie Phillips, Ceri Phillips, Judith Roberts, Stephen Russell, Ian Sánchez, Antonio Wani, Mushtaq Wells, Bridget Whitfield, Richard |
author_sort | Snooks, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many emergency ambulance calls are for older people who have fallen. As half of them are left at home, a community-based response may often be more appropriate than hospital attendance. The SAFER 1 trial will assess the costs and benefits of a new healthcare technology - hand-held computers with computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) software - to help paramedics decide who needs hospital attendance, and who can be safely left at home with referral to community falls services. METHODS/DESIGN: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial with a qualitative component. We shall allocate 72 paramedics ('clusters') at random between receiving the intervention and a control group delivering care as usual, of whom we expect 60 to complete the trial. Patients are eligible if they are aged 65 or older, live in the study area but not in residential care, and are attended by a study paramedic following an emergency call for a fall. Seven to 10 days after the index fall we shall offer patients the opportunity to opt out of further follow up. Continuing participants will receive questionnaires after one and 6 months, and we shall monitor their routine clinical data for 6 months. We shall interview 20 of these patients in depth. We shall conduct focus groups or semi-structured interviews with paramedics and other stakeholders. The primary outcome is the interval to the first subsequent reported fall (or death). We shall analyse this and other measures of outcome, process and cost by 'intention to treat'. We shall analyse qualitative data thematically. DISCUSSION: Since the SAFER 1 trial received funding in August 2006, implementation has come to terms with ambulance service reorganisation and a new national electronic patient record in England. In response to these hurdles the research team has adapted the research design, including aspects of the intervention, to meet the needs of the ambulance services. In conclusion this complex emergency care trial will provide rigorous evidence on the clinical and cost effectiveness of CCDS for paramedics in the care of older people who have fallen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN10538608 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2824628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28246282010-02-19 Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial Snooks, Helen Cheung, Wai-Yee Close, Jacqueline Dale, Jeremy Gaze, Sarah Humphreys, Ioan Lyons, Ronan Mason, Suzanne Merali, Yasmin Peconi, Julie Phillips, Ceri Phillips, Judith Roberts, Stephen Russell, Ian Sánchez, Antonio Wani, Mushtaq Wells, Bridget Whitfield, Richard BMC Emerg Med Study protocol BACKGROUND: Many emergency ambulance calls are for older people who have fallen. As half of them are left at home, a community-based response may often be more appropriate than hospital attendance. The SAFER 1 trial will assess the costs and benefits of a new healthcare technology - hand-held computers with computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) software - to help paramedics decide who needs hospital attendance, and who can be safely left at home with referral to community falls services. METHODS/DESIGN: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial with a qualitative component. We shall allocate 72 paramedics ('clusters') at random between receiving the intervention and a control group delivering care as usual, of whom we expect 60 to complete the trial. Patients are eligible if they are aged 65 or older, live in the study area but not in residential care, and are attended by a study paramedic following an emergency call for a fall. Seven to 10 days after the index fall we shall offer patients the opportunity to opt out of further follow up. Continuing participants will receive questionnaires after one and 6 months, and we shall monitor their routine clinical data for 6 months. We shall interview 20 of these patients in depth. We shall conduct focus groups or semi-structured interviews with paramedics and other stakeholders. The primary outcome is the interval to the first subsequent reported fall (or death). We shall analyse this and other measures of outcome, process and cost by 'intention to treat'. We shall analyse qualitative data thematically. DISCUSSION: Since the SAFER 1 trial received funding in August 2006, implementation has come to terms with ambulance service reorganisation and a new national electronic patient record in England. In response to these hurdles the research team has adapted the research design, including aspects of the intervention, to meet the needs of the ambulance services. In conclusion this complex emergency care trial will provide rigorous evidence on the clinical and cost effectiveness of CCDS for paramedics in the care of older people who have fallen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN10538608 BioMed Central 2010-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2824628/ /pubmed/20102616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-10-2 Text en Copyright ©2010 Snooks et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study protocol Snooks, Helen Cheung, Wai-Yee Close, Jacqueline Dale, Jeremy Gaze, Sarah Humphreys, Ioan Lyons, Ronan Mason, Suzanne Merali, Yasmin Peconi, Julie Phillips, Ceri Phillips, Judith Roberts, Stephen Russell, Ian Sánchez, Antonio Wani, Mushtaq Wells, Bridget Whitfield, Richard Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
title | Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
title_full | Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
title_short | Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
title_sort | support and assessment for fall emergency referrals (safer 1) trial protocol. computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial |
topic | Study protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2824628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20102616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-10-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT snookshelen supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT cheungwaiyee supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT closejacqueline supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT dalejeremy supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT gazesarah supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT humphreysioan supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT lyonsronan supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT masonsuzanne supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT meraliyasmin supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT peconijulie supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT phillipsceri supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT phillipsjudith supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT robertsstephen supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT russellian supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT sanchezantonio supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT wanimushtaq supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT wellsbridget supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial AT whitfieldrichard supportandassessmentforfallemergencyreferralssafer1trialprotocolcomputerisedonscenedecisionsupportforemergencyambulancestafftoassessandplancareforolderpeoplewhohavefallenevaluationofcostsandbenefitsusingapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial |