Cargando…

Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges

This study was designed to investigate variation in Varian's Physical and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors (WF) as a function of depth and field size. The profiles for physical wedges (PWs) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) were also measured using LDA-99 array and compared for confirmation of E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Misbah, Hussain, Amjad, Muhammad, Wazir, Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas, Matiullah
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177568
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.57116
_version_ 1782177771824349184
author Ahmad, Misbah
Hussain, Amjad
Muhammad, Wazir
Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas
Matiullah,
author_facet Ahmad, Misbah
Hussain, Amjad
Muhammad, Wazir
Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas
Matiullah,
author_sort Ahmad, Misbah
collection PubMed
description This study was designed to investigate variation in Varian's Physical and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors (WF) as a function of depth and field size. The profiles for physical wedges (PWs) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) were also measured using LDA-99 array and compared for confirmation of EDW angles at different depths and field sizes. WF measurements were performed in water phantom using cylindrical 0.66 cc ionization chamber. WF was measured by taking the ratio of wedge and open field ionization data. A normalized wedge factor (NWF) was introduced to circumvent large differences between wedge factors for different wedge angles. A strong linear dependence of PW Factor (PWF) with depth was observed. Maximum variation of 8.9% and 4.1% was observed for 60° PW with depth at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively. The variation in EDW Factor (EDWF) with depth was almost negligible and less than two per cent. The highest variation in PWF as a function of field size was 4.1% and 3.4% for thicker wedge (60°) at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively and decreases with decreasing wedge angle. EDWF shows strong field size dependence and significant variation was observed for all wedges at both photon energies. Differences in profiles between PW and EDW were observed on toe and heel sides. These differences were dominant for larger fields, shallow depths, thicker wedges and low energy beam. The study indicated that ignoring depth and field size dependence of WF may result in under/over dose to the patient especially doing manual point dose calculation.
format Text
id pubmed-2825002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28250022010-02-22 Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges Ahmad, Misbah Hussain, Amjad Muhammad, Wazir Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas Matiullah, J Med Phys Original Article This study was designed to investigate variation in Varian's Physical and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors (WF) as a function of depth and field size. The profiles for physical wedges (PWs) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) were also measured using LDA-99 array and compared for confirmation of EDW angles at different depths and field sizes. WF measurements were performed in water phantom using cylindrical 0.66 cc ionization chamber. WF was measured by taking the ratio of wedge and open field ionization data. A normalized wedge factor (NWF) was introduced to circumvent large differences between wedge factors for different wedge angles. A strong linear dependence of PW Factor (PWF) with depth was observed. Maximum variation of 8.9% and 4.1% was observed for 60° PW with depth at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively. The variation in EDW Factor (EDWF) with depth was almost negligible and less than two per cent. The highest variation in PWF as a function of field size was 4.1% and 3.4% for thicker wedge (60°) at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively and decreases with decreasing wedge angle. EDWF shows strong field size dependence and significant variation was observed for all wedges at both photon energies. Differences in profiles between PW and EDW were observed on toe and heel sides. These differences were dominant for larger fields, shallow depths, thicker wedges and low energy beam. The study indicated that ignoring depth and field size dependence of WF may result in under/over dose to the patient especially doing manual point dose calculation. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2825002/ /pubmed/20177568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.57116 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmad, Misbah
Hussain, Amjad
Muhammad, Wazir
Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas
Matiullah,
Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
title Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
title_full Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
title_fullStr Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
title_full_unstemmed Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
title_short Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
title_sort studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177568
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.57116
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmisbah studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges
AT hussainamjad studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges
AT muhammadwazir studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges
AT rizvisyedqaisarabbas studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges
AT matiullah studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges