Cargando…
Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges
This study was designed to investigate variation in Varian's Physical and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors (WF) as a function of depth and field size. The profiles for physical wedges (PWs) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) were also measured using LDA-99 array and compared for confirmation of E...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.57116 |
_version_ | 1782177771824349184 |
---|---|
author | Ahmad, Misbah Hussain, Amjad Muhammad, Wazir Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas Matiullah, |
author_facet | Ahmad, Misbah Hussain, Amjad Muhammad, Wazir Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas Matiullah, |
author_sort | Ahmad, Misbah |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study was designed to investigate variation in Varian's Physical and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors (WF) as a function of depth and field size. The profiles for physical wedges (PWs) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) were also measured using LDA-99 array and compared for confirmation of EDW angles at different depths and field sizes. WF measurements were performed in water phantom using cylindrical 0.66 cc ionization chamber. WF was measured by taking the ratio of wedge and open field ionization data. A normalized wedge factor (NWF) was introduced to circumvent large differences between wedge factors for different wedge angles. A strong linear dependence of PW Factor (PWF) with depth was observed. Maximum variation of 8.9% and 4.1% was observed for 60° PW with depth at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively. The variation in EDW Factor (EDWF) with depth was almost negligible and less than two per cent. The highest variation in PWF as a function of field size was 4.1% and 3.4% for thicker wedge (60°) at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively and decreases with decreasing wedge angle. EDWF shows strong field size dependence and significant variation was observed for all wedges at both photon energies. Differences in profiles between PW and EDW were observed on toe and heel sides. These differences were dominant for larger fields, shallow depths, thicker wedges and low energy beam. The study indicated that ignoring depth and field size dependence of WF may result in under/over dose to the patient especially doing manual point dose calculation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2825002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28250022010-02-22 Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges Ahmad, Misbah Hussain, Amjad Muhammad, Wazir Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas Matiullah, J Med Phys Original Article This study was designed to investigate variation in Varian's Physical and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors (WF) as a function of depth and field size. The profiles for physical wedges (PWs) and enhanced dynamic wedges (EDWs) were also measured using LDA-99 array and compared for confirmation of EDW angles at different depths and field sizes. WF measurements were performed in water phantom using cylindrical 0.66 cc ionization chamber. WF was measured by taking the ratio of wedge and open field ionization data. A normalized wedge factor (NWF) was introduced to circumvent large differences between wedge factors for different wedge angles. A strong linear dependence of PW Factor (PWF) with depth was observed. Maximum variation of 8.9% and 4.1% was observed for 60° PW with depth at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively. The variation in EDW Factor (EDWF) with depth was almost negligible and less than two per cent. The highest variation in PWF as a function of field size was 4.1% and 3.4% for thicker wedge (60°) at 6 and 15 MV beams respectively and decreases with decreasing wedge angle. EDWF shows strong field size dependence and significant variation was observed for all wedges at both photon energies. Differences in profiles between PW and EDW were observed on toe and heel sides. These differences were dominant for larger fields, shallow depths, thicker wedges and low energy beam. The study indicated that ignoring depth and field size dependence of WF may result in under/over dose to the patient especially doing manual point dose calculation. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2825002/ /pubmed/20177568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.57116 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ahmad, Misbah Hussain, Amjad Muhammad, Wazir Rizvi, Syed Qaisar Abbas Matiullah, Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
title | Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
title_full | Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
title_fullStr | Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
title_full_unstemmed | Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
title_short | Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
title_sort | studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20177568 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.57116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadmisbah studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges AT hussainamjad studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges AT muhammadwazir studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges AT rizvisyedqaisarabbas studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges AT matiullah studyingwedgefactorsandbeamprofilesforphysicalandenhanceddynamicwedges |