Cargando…
An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay
The increasing use of single cell gel electrophoresis (the comet assay) highlights its popularity as a method for detecting DNA damage, including the use of enzymes for assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA. However, comparison of DNA damage levels between laboratories can be difficult due to differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19948595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep055 |
_version_ | 1782177811338887168 |
---|---|
author | Johansson, Clara Møller, Peter Forchhammer, Lykke Loft, Steffen Godschalk, Roger W. L. Langie, Sabine A. S. Lumeij, Stijn Jones, George D. D. Kwok, Rachel W. L. Azqueta, Amaya Phillips, David H. Sozeri, Osman Routledge, Michael N. Charlton, Alexander J. Riso, Patrizia Porrini, Marisa Allione, Alessandra Matullo, Giuseppe Palus, Jadwiga Stepnik, Maciej Collins, Andrew R. Möller, Lennart |
author_facet | Johansson, Clara Møller, Peter Forchhammer, Lykke Loft, Steffen Godschalk, Roger W. L. Langie, Sabine A. S. Lumeij, Stijn Jones, George D. D. Kwok, Rachel W. L. Azqueta, Amaya Phillips, David H. Sozeri, Osman Routledge, Michael N. Charlton, Alexander J. Riso, Patrizia Porrini, Marisa Allione, Alessandra Matullo, Giuseppe Palus, Jadwiga Stepnik, Maciej Collins, Andrew R. Möller, Lennart |
author_sort | Johansson, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increasing use of single cell gel electrophoresis (the comet assay) highlights its popularity as a method for detecting DNA damage, including the use of enzymes for assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA. However, comparison of DNA damage levels between laboratories can be difficult due to differences in assay protocols (e.g. lysis conditions, enzyme treatment, the duration of the alkaline treatment and electrophoresis) and in the end points used for reporting results (e.g. %DNA in tail, arbitrary units, tail moment and tail length). One way to facilitate comparisons is to convert primary comet assay end points to number of lesions/10(6) bp by calibration with ionizing radiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-laboratory variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA by the comet assay in terms of oxidized purines converted to strand breaks with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG). Coded samples with DNA oxidation damage induced by treatment with different concentrations of photosensitizer (Ro 19-8022) plus light and calibration samples irradiated with ionizing radiation were distributed to the 10 participating laboratories to measure DNA damage using their own comet assay protocols. Nine of 10 laboratories reported the same ranking of the level of damage in the coded samples. The variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA was largely due to differences in protocols. After conversion of the data to lesions/10(6) bp using laboratory-specific calibration curves, the variation between the laboratories was reduced. The contribution of the concentration of photosensitizer to the variation in net FPG-sensitive sites increased from 49 to 73%, whereas the inter-laboratory variation decreased. The participating laboratories were successful in finding a dose–response of oxidatively damaged DNA in coded samples, but there remains a need to standardize the protocols to enable direct comparisons between laboratories. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2825342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28253422010-02-22 An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay Johansson, Clara Møller, Peter Forchhammer, Lykke Loft, Steffen Godschalk, Roger W. L. Langie, Sabine A. S. Lumeij, Stijn Jones, George D. D. Kwok, Rachel W. L. Azqueta, Amaya Phillips, David H. Sozeri, Osman Routledge, Michael N. Charlton, Alexander J. Riso, Patrizia Porrini, Marisa Allione, Alessandra Matullo, Giuseppe Palus, Jadwiga Stepnik, Maciej Collins, Andrew R. Möller, Lennart Mutagenesis Original Articles The increasing use of single cell gel electrophoresis (the comet assay) highlights its popularity as a method for detecting DNA damage, including the use of enzymes for assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA. However, comparison of DNA damage levels between laboratories can be difficult due to differences in assay protocols (e.g. lysis conditions, enzyme treatment, the duration of the alkaline treatment and electrophoresis) and in the end points used for reporting results (e.g. %DNA in tail, arbitrary units, tail moment and tail length). One way to facilitate comparisons is to convert primary comet assay end points to number of lesions/10(6) bp by calibration with ionizing radiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-laboratory variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA by the comet assay in terms of oxidized purines converted to strand breaks with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG). Coded samples with DNA oxidation damage induced by treatment with different concentrations of photosensitizer (Ro 19-8022) plus light and calibration samples irradiated with ionizing radiation were distributed to the 10 participating laboratories to measure DNA damage using their own comet assay protocols. Nine of 10 laboratories reported the same ranking of the level of damage in the coded samples. The variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA was largely due to differences in protocols. After conversion of the data to lesions/10(6) bp using laboratory-specific calibration curves, the variation between the laboratories was reduced. The contribution of the concentration of photosensitizer to the variation in net FPG-sensitive sites increased from 49 to 73%, whereas the inter-laboratory variation decreased. The participating laboratories were successful in finding a dose–response of oxidatively damaged DNA in coded samples, but there remains a need to standardize the protocols to enable direct comparisons between laboratories. Oxford University Press 2010-03 2009-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2825342/ /pubmed/19948595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep055 Text en © 2009 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Johansson, Clara Møller, Peter Forchhammer, Lykke Loft, Steffen Godschalk, Roger W. L. Langie, Sabine A. S. Lumeij, Stijn Jones, George D. D. Kwok, Rachel W. L. Azqueta, Amaya Phillips, David H. Sozeri, Osman Routledge, Michael N. Charlton, Alexander J. Riso, Patrizia Porrini, Marisa Allione, Alessandra Matullo, Giuseppe Palus, Jadwiga Stepnik, Maciej Collins, Andrew R. Möller, Lennart An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay |
title | An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay |
title_full | An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay |
title_fullStr | An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay |
title_full_unstemmed | An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay |
title_short | An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay |
title_sort | ecvag† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to dna measured by the comet assay |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19948595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johanssonclara anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT møllerpeter anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT forchhammerlykke anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT loftsteffen anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT godschalkrogerwl anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT langiesabineas anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT lumeijstijn anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT jonesgeorgedd anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT kwokrachelwl anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT azquetaamaya anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT phillipsdavidh anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT sozeriosman anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT routledgemichaeln anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT charltonalexanderj anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT risopatrizia anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT porrinimarisa anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT allionealessandra anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT matullogiuseppe anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT palusjadwiga anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT stepnikmaciej anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT collinsandrewr anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT mollerlennart anecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT johanssonclara ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT møllerpeter ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT forchhammerlykke ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT loftsteffen ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT godschalkrogerwl ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT langiesabineas ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT lumeijstijn ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT jonesgeorgedd ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT kwokrachelwl ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT azquetaamaya ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT phillipsdavidh ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT sozeriosman ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT routledgemichaeln ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT charltonalexanderj ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT risopatrizia ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT porrinimarisa ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT allionealessandra ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT matullogiuseppe ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT palusjadwiga ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT stepnikmaciej ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT collinsandrewr ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay AT mollerlennart ecvagtrialonassessmentofoxidativedamagetodnameasuredbythecometassay |