Cargando…

From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal

BACKGROUND: Perception of subjective visual vertical (SVV) and horizontal (SVH) has traditionally been measured by rotating a mechanical rod either with or without a frame present. The computerised rod and frame (CRAF) system has previously only been used to measure SVV. We have expanded the use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Docherty, Sharon, Bagust, Jeff
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20205858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-9
_version_ 1782177858773319680
author Docherty, Sharon
Bagust, Jeff
author_facet Docherty, Sharon
Bagust, Jeff
author_sort Docherty, Sharon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perception of subjective visual vertical (SVV) and horizontal (SVH) has traditionally been measured by rotating a mechanical rod either with or without a frame present. The computerised rod and frame (CRAF) system has previously only been used to measure SVV. We have expanded the use of this system by testing its feasibility to measure SVH. This was done by comparing two groups of subjects (n = 103) randomly assigned to be tested for SVV or SVH. FINDINGS: Preliminary results showed a higher than expected percentage of individuals with SVH errors < 0.5°. This was attributed to additional visual cues provided by the changing appearance of the rod as it approached the horizontal. A solution to this problem was sought by replacing the rod by two dots to mark its ends. In a second investigation 30 subjects were tested using both the "rod as line" and "rod as dots" presentation. Bland and Altman analysis showed no difference between the rod and dots presentations in the measurement of SVV, but confirmed a fixed error of -0.93° between rods and dots for SVH. Changing the rod from a line to dots in the computer system resulted in errors for both SVV and SVH that were comparable to previous studies using manual systems. CONCLUSIONS: The computerized rod and frame system may be improved by replacement of the line with two dots. This reduces clues provided to the subject by the appearance of the rod on the screen.
format Text
id pubmed-2826355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28263552010-02-23 From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal Docherty, Sharon Bagust, Jeff BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Perception of subjective visual vertical (SVV) and horizontal (SVH) has traditionally been measured by rotating a mechanical rod either with or without a frame present. The computerised rod and frame (CRAF) system has previously only been used to measure SVV. We have expanded the use of this system by testing its feasibility to measure SVH. This was done by comparing two groups of subjects (n = 103) randomly assigned to be tested for SVV or SVH. FINDINGS: Preliminary results showed a higher than expected percentage of individuals with SVH errors < 0.5°. This was attributed to additional visual cues provided by the changing appearance of the rod as it approached the horizontal. A solution to this problem was sought by replacing the rod by two dots to mark its ends. In a second investigation 30 subjects were tested using both the "rod as line" and "rod as dots" presentation. Bland and Altman analysis showed no difference between the rod and dots presentations in the measurement of SVV, but confirmed a fixed error of -0.93° between rods and dots for SVH. Changing the rod from a line to dots in the computer system resulted in errors for both SVV and SVH that were comparable to previous studies using manual systems. CONCLUSIONS: The computerized rod and frame system may be improved by replacement of the line with two dots. This reduces clues provided to the subject by the appearance of the rod on the screen. BioMed Central 2010-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2826355/ /pubmed/20205858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-9 Text en Copyright ©2010 Docherty et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Docherty, Sharon
Bagust, Jeff
From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
title From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
title_full From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
title_fullStr From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
title_full_unstemmed From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
title_short From line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
title_sort from line to dots: an improved computerised rod and frame system for testing subjective visual vertical and horizontal
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20205858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dochertysharon fromlinetodotsanimprovedcomputerisedrodandframesystemfortestingsubjectivevisualverticalandhorizontal
AT bagustjeff fromlinetodotsanimprovedcomputerisedrodandframesystemfortestingsubjectivevisualverticalandhorizontal