Cargando…

Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?

AIM: Previous surveys have revealed wide variations in the management by radiation oncologists of non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) in Canada. The aim of the present study was to determine the current patterns of practice for locally advanced and metastatic nsclc among Canadian radiation oncologist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, K., Bezjak, A., Xu, W., Kane, G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Multimed Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20179801
_version_ 1782177888810827776
author Han, K.
Bezjak, A.
Xu, W.
Kane, G.
author_facet Han, K.
Bezjak, A.
Xu, W.
Kane, G.
author_sort Han, K.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Previous surveys have revealed wide variations in the management by radiation oncologists of non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) in Canada. The aim of the present study was to determine the current patterns of practice for locally advanced and metastatic nsclc among Canadian radiation oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was distributed electronically to all members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists. Those who treat lung cancer were invited to participate. The survey consisted of three scenarios focusing on areas of nsclc treatment in which the radiotherapy (rt) regimen that provides the best therapeutic ratio is unclear. RESULTS: Replies from 41 respondents were analyzed. For an asymptomatic patient with stage iiib nsclc unsuitable for radical treatment, 22% recommended immediate rt, and 78% recommended rt only if the patient were to become symptomatic. Those who believed that immediate rt prolongs survival were more likely to recommend it (p = 0.028). For a patient with a bulky stage iiib tumour and good performance status, 39% recommended palliative treatment, and 61% recommended radical treatment (84% concurrent vs. 16% sequential chemoradiation at 60–66 Gy in 30–33 fractions). Those who believed that chemoradiation has a greater impact on survival were more likely to recommend it (p < 0.001). For a symptomatic patient with stage iv nsclc, 54% recommended external-beam rt (ebrt) alone, 41% recommended other modalities (brachytherapy, endobronchial therapy, or chemotherapy) with or without ebrt, and 5% recommended best supportive care. A majority (76%) prescribed 20 Gy in 5 fractions for ebrt. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous surveys, more radiation oncologists now offer radical treatment for locally advanced nsclc. Management of nsclc in Canada may be evidence-based, but perception by radiation oncologists of the treatment’s impact on survival also influences treatment decisions.
format Text
id pubmed-2826774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Multimed Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28267742010-02-23 Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada? Han, K. Bezjak, A. Xu, W. Kane, G. Curr Oncol Radiation Oncology AIM: Previous surveys have revealed wide variations in the management by radiation oncologists of non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) in Canada. The aim of the present study was to determine the current patterns of practice for locally advanced and metastatic nsclc among Canadian radiation oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was distributed electronically to all members of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists. Those who treat lung cancer were invited to participate. The survey consisted of three scenarios focusing on areas of nsclc treatment in which the radiotherapy (rt) regimen that provides the best therapeutic ratio is unclear. RESULTS: Replies from 41 respondents were analyzed. For an asymptomatic patient with stage iiib nsclc unsuitable for radical treatment, 22% recommended immediate rt, and 78% recommended rt only if the patient were to become symptomatic. Those who believed that immediate rt prolongs survival were more likely to recommend it (p = 0.028). For a patient with a bulky stage iiib tumour and good performance status, 39% recommended palliative treatment, and 61% recommended radical treatment (84% concurrent vs. 16% sequential chemoradiation at 60–66 Gy in 30–33 fractions). Those who believed that chemoradiation has a greater impact on survival were more likely to recommend it (p < 0.001). For a symptomatic patient with stage iv nsclc, 54% recommended external-beam rt (ebrt) alone, 41% recommended other modalities (brachytherapy, endobronchial therapy, or chemotherapy) with or without ebrt, and 5% recommended best supportive care. A majority (76%) prescribed 20 Gy in 5 fractions for ebrt. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous surveys, more radiation oncologists now offer radical treatment for locally advanced nsclc. Management of nsclc in Canada may be evidence-based, but perception by radiation oncologists of the treatment’s impact on survival also influences treatment decisions. Multimed Inc. 2010-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2826774/ /pubmed/20179801 Text en 2010 Multimed Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Han, K.
Bezjak, A.
Xu, W.
Kane, G.
Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?
title Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?
title_full Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?
title_fullStr Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?
title_full_unstemmed Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?
title_short Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?
title_sort has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in canada?
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20179801
work_keys_str_mv AT hank hasthepracticeofradiationoncologyforlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerchangedincanada
AT bezjaka hasthepracticeofradiationoncologyforlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerchangedincanada
AT xuw hasthepracticeofradiationoncologyforlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerchangedincanada
AT kaneg hasthepracticeofradiationoncologyforlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerchangedincanada