Cargando…

Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora

BACKGROUND: The necrogenic enterobacterium, Erwinia amylovora is the causal agent of the fire blight (FB) disease in many Rosaceaespecies, including apple and pear. During the infection process, the bacteria induce an oxidative stress response with kinetics similar to those induced in an incompatibl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baldo, Angela, Norelli, Jay L, Farrell, Robert E, Bassett, Carole L, Aldwinckle, Herb S, Malnoy, Mickael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-1
_version_ 1782177939720241152
author Baldo, Angela
Norelli, Jay L
Farrell, Robert E
Bassett, Carole L
Aldwinckle, Herb S
Malnoy, Mickael
author_facet Baldo, Angela
Norelli, Jay L
Farrell, Robert E
Bassett, Carole L
Aldwinckle, Herb S
Malnoy, Mickael
author_sort Baldo, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The necrogenic enterobacterium, Erwinia amylovora is the causal agent of the fire blight (FB) disease in many Rosaceaespecies, including apple and pear. During the infection process, the bacteria induce an oxidative stress response with kinetics similar to those induced in an incompatible bacteria-plant interaction. No resistance mechanism to E. amylovora in host plants has yet been characterized, recent work has identified some molecular events which occur in resistant and/or susceptible host interaction with E. amylovora: In order to understand the mechanisms that characterize responses to FB, differentially expressed genes were identified by cDNA-AFLP analysis in resistant and susceptible apple genotypes after inoculation with E. amylovora. RESULTS: cDNA were isolated from M.26 (susceptible) and G.41 (resistant) apple tissues collected 2 h and 48 h after challenge with a virulent E. amylovora strain or mock (buffer) inoculated. To identify differentially expressed transcripts, electrophoretic banding patterns were obtained from cDNAs. In the AFLP experiments, M.26 and G.41 showed different patterns of expression, including genes specifically induced, not induced, or repressed by E. amylovora. In total, 190 ESTs differentially expressed between M.26 and G.41 were identified using 42 pairs of AFLP primers. cDNA-AFLP analysis of global EST expression in a resistant and a susceptible apple genotype identified different major classes of genes. EST sequencing data showed that genes linked to resistance, encoding proteins involved in recognition, signaling, defense and apoptosis, were modulated by E. amylovora in its host plant. The expression time course of some of these ESTs selected via a bioinformatic analysis has been characterized. CONCLUSION: These data are being used to develop hypotheses of resistance or susceptibility mechanisms in Malus to E. amylovora and provide an initial categorization of genes possibly involved in recognition events, early signaling responses the subsequent development of resistance or susceptibility. These data also provided potential candidates for improving apple resistance to fire blight either by marker-assisted selection or genetic engineering.
format Text
id pubmed-2827420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28274202010-02-24 Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora Baldo, Angela Norelli, Jay L Farrell, Robert E Bassett, Carole L Aldwinckle, Herb S Malnoy, Mickael BMC Plant Biol Research article BACKGROUND: The necrogenic enterobacterium, Erwinia amylovora is the causal agent of the fire blight (FB) disease in many Rosaceaespecies, including apple and pear. During the infection process, the bacteria induce an oxidative stress response with kinetics similar to those induced in an incompatible bacteria-plant interaction. No resistance mechanism to E. amylovora in host plants has yet been characterized, recent work has identified some molecular events which occur in resistant and/or susceptible host interaction with E. amylovora: In order to understand the mechanisms that characterize responses to FB, differentially expressed genes were identified by cDNA-AFLP analysis in resistant and susceptible apple genotypes after inoculation with E. amylovora. RESULTS: cDNA were isolated from M.26 (susceptible) and G.41 (resistant) apple tissues collected 2 h and 48 h after challenge with a virulent E. amylovora strain or mock (buffer) inoculated. To identify differentially expressed transcripts, electrophoretic banding patterns were obtained from cDNAs. In the AFLP experiments, M.26 and G.41 showed different patterns of expression, including genes specifically induced, not induced, or repressed by E. amylovora. In total, 190 ESTs differentially expressed between M.26 and G.41 were identified using 42 pairs of AFLP primers. cDNA-AFLP analysis of global EST expression in a resistant and a susceptible apple genotype identified different major classes of genes. EST sequencing data showed that genes linked to resistance, encoding proteins involved in recognition, signaling, defense and apoptosis, were modulated by E. amylovora in its host plant. The expression time course of some of these ESTs selected via a bioinformatic analysis has been characterized. CONCLUSION: These data are being used to develop hypotheses of resistance or susceptibility mechanisms in Malus to E. amylovora and provide an initial categorization of genes possibly involved in recognition events, early signaling responses the subsequent development of resistance or susceptibility. These data also provided potential candidates for improving apple resistance to fire blight either by marker-assisted selection or genetic engineering. BioMed Central 2010-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2827420/ /pubmed/20047654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-1 Text en Copyright ©2010 Baldo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Baldo, Angela
Norelli, Jay L
Farrell, Robert E
Bassett, Carole L
Aldwinckle, Herb S
Malnoy, Mickael
Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora
title Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora
title_full Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora
title_fullStr Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora
title_full_unstemmed Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora
title_short Identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (Malus × domestica) with Erwinia amylovora
title_sort identification of genes differentially expressed during interaction of resistant and susceptible apple cultivars (malus × domestica) with erwinia amylovora
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-1
work_keys_str_mv AT baldoangela identificationofgenesdifferentiallyexpressedduringinteractionofresistantandsusceptibleapplecultivarsmalusdomesticawitherwiniaamylovora
AT norellijayl identificationofgenesdifferentiallyexpressedduringinteractionofresistantandsusceptibleapplecultivarsmalusdomesticawitherwiniaamylovora
AT farrellroberte identificationofgenesdifferentiallyexpressedduringinteractionofresistantandsusceptibleapplecultivarsmalusdomesticawitherwiniaamylovora
AT bassettcarolel identificationofgenesdifferentiallyexpressedduringinteractionofresistantandsusceptibleapplecultivarsmalusdomesticawitherwiniaamylovora
AT aldwinckleherbs identificationofgenesdifferentiallyexpressedduringinteractionofresistantandsusceptibleapplecultivarsmalusdomesticawitherwiniaamylovora
AT malnoymickael identificationofgenesdifferentiallyexpressedduringinteractionofresistantandsusceptibleapplecultivarsmalusdomesticawitherwiniaamylovora