Cargando…
Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total 124 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the real-time CGM group (n = 63; gl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20007948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1352 |
_version_ | 1782177949516038144 |
---|---|
author | Holzinger, Ulrike Warszawska, Joanna Kitzberger, Reinhard Wewalka, Marlene Miehsler, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Madl, Christian |
author_facet | Holzinger, Ulrike Warszawska, Joanna Kitzberger, Reinhard Wewalka, Marlene Miehsler, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Madl, Christian |
author_sort | Holzinger, Ulrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total 124 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the real-time CGM group (n = 63; glucose values given every 5 min) or to the control group (n = 61; selective arterial glucose measurements according to an algorithm; simultaneously blinded CGM) for 72 h. Insulin infusion rates were guided according to the same algorithm in both groups. The primary end point was percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl. Secondary end points were mean glucose levels and rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl). RESULTS: Percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl (59.0 ± 20 vs. 55.0 ± 18% in the control group, P = 0.245) and the mean glucose level (106 ± 18 vs. 111 ± 10 mg/dl in the control group, P = 0.076) could not be improved using real-time CGM. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was lower in the real-time CGM group (1.6 vs. 11.5% in the control group, P = 0.031). CGM reduced the absolute risk of severe hypoglycemia by 9.9% (95% CI 1.2–18.6) with a number needed to treat of 10.1 (95% CI 5.4–83.3). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, real-time CGM reduces hypoglycemic events but does not improve glycemic control compared with intensive insulin therapy guided by an algorithm. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2827490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28274902011-03-01 Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial Holzinger, Ulrike Warszawska, Joanna Kitzberger, Reinhard Wewalka, Marlene Miehsler, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Madl, Christian Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total 124 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the real-time CGM group (n = 63; glucose values given every 5 min) or to the control group (n = 61; selective arterial glucose measurements according to an algorithm; simultaneously blinded CGM) for 72 h. Insulin infusion rates were guided according to the same algorithm in both groups. The primary end point was percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl. Secondary end points were mean glucose levels and rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl). RESULTS: Percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl (59.0 ± 20 vs. 55.0 ± 18% in the control group, P = 0.245) and the mean glucose level (106 ± 18 vs. 111 ± 10 mg/dl in the control group, P = 0.076) could not be improved using real-time CGM. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was lower in the real-time CGM group (1.6 vs. 11.5% in the control group, P = 0.031). CGM reduced the absolute risk of severe hypoglycemia by 9.9% (95% CI 1.2–18.6) with a number needed to treat of 10.1 (95% CI 5.4–83.3). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, real-time CGM reduces hypoglycemic events but does not improve glycemic control compared with intensive insulin therapy guided by an algorithm. American Diabetes Association 2010-03 2009-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2827490/ /pubmed/20007948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1352 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Holzinger, Ulrike Warszawska, Joanna Kitzberger, Reinhard Wewalka, Marlene Miehsler, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Madl, Christian Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial |
title | Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial |
title_full | Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial |
title_short | Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial |
title_sort | real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20007948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holzingerulrike realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT warszawskajoanna realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT kitzbergerreinhard realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT wewalkamarlene realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT miehslerwolfgang realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT herknerharald realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT madlchristian realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial |