Cargando…

Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total 124 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the real-time CGM group (n = 63; gl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holzinger, Ulrike, Warszawska, Joanna, Kitzberger, Reinhard, Wewalka, Marlene, Miehsler, Wolfgang, Herkner, Harald, Madl, Christian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20007948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1352
_version_ 1782177949516038144
author Holzinger, Ulrike
Warszawska, Joanna
Kitzberger, Reinhard
Wewalka, Marlene
Miehsler, Wolfgang
Herkner, Harald
Madl, Christian
author_facet Holzinger, Ulrike
Warszawska, Joanna
Kitzberger, Reinhard
Wewalka, Marlene
Miehsler, Wolfgang
Herkner, Harald
Madl, Christian
author_sort Holzinger, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total 124 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the real-time CGM group (n = 63; glucose values given every 5 min) or to the control group (n = 61; selective arterial glucose measurements according to an algorithm; simultaneously blinded CGM) for 72 h. Insulin infusion rates were guided according to the same algorithm in both groups. The primary end point was percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl. Secondary end points were mean glucose levels and rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl). RESULTS: Percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl (59.0 ± 20 vs. 55.0 ± 18% in the control group, P = 0.245) and the mean glucose level (106 ± 18 vs. 111 ± 10 mg/dl in the control group, P = 0.076) could not be improved using real-time CGM. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was lower in the real-time CGM group (1.6 vs. 11.5% in the control group, P = 0.031). CGM reduced the absolute risk of severe hypoglycemia by 9.9% (95% CI 1.2–18.6) with a number needed to treat of 10.1 (95% CI 5.4–83.3). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, real-time CGM reduces hypoglycemic events but does not improve glycemic control compared with intensive insulin therapy guided by an algorithm.
format Text
id pubmed-2827490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28274902011-03-01 Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial Holzinger, Ulrike Warszawska, Joanna Kitzberger, Reinhard Wewalka, Marlene Miehsler, Wolfgang Herkner, Harald Madl, Christian Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total 124 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to the real-time CGM group (n = 63; glucose values given every 5 min) or to the control group (n = 61; selective arterial glucose measurements according to an algorithm; simultaneously blinded CGM) for 72 h. Insulin infusion rates were guided according to the same algorithm in both groups. The primary end point was percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl. Secondary end points were mean glucose levels and rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl). RESULTS: Percentage of time at a glucose level <110 mg/dl (59.0 ± 20 vs. 55.0 ± 18% in the control group, P = 0.245) and the mean glucose level (106 ± 18 vs. 111 ± 10 mg/dl in the control group, P = 0.076) could not be improved using real-time CGM. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was lower in the real-time CGM group (1.6 vs. 11.5% in the control group, P = 0.031). CGM reduced the absolute risk of severe hypoglycemia by 9.9% (95% CI 1.2–18.6) with a number needed to treat of 10.1 (95% CI 5.4–83.3). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, real-time CGM reduces hypoglycemic events but does not improve glycemic control compared with intensive insulin therapy guided by an algorithm. American Diabetes Association 2010-03 2009-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2827490/ /pubmed/20007948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1352 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Holzinger, Ulrike
Warszawska, Joanna
Kitzberger, Reinhard
Wewalka, Marlene
Miehsler, Wolfgang
Herkner, Harald
Madl, Christian
Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
title Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
title_full Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
title_fullStr Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
title_short Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A prospective randomized trial
title_sort real-time continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20007948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1352
work_keys_str_mv AT holzingerulrike realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT warszawskajoanna realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kitzbergerreinhard realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT wewalkamarlene realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT miehslerwolfgang realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT herknerharald realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT madlchristian realtimecontinuousglucosemonitoringincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedtrial