Cargando…
Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524 |
_version_ | 1782177953845608448 |
---|---|
author | Cowie, Catherine C. Rust, Keith F. Byrd-Holt, Danita D. Gregg, Edward W. Ford, Earl S. Geiss, Linda S. Bainbridge, Kathleen E. Fradkin, Judith E. |
author_facet | Cowie, Catherine C. Rust, Keith F. Byrd-Holt, Danita D. Gregg, Edward W. Ford, Earl S. Geiss, Linda S. Bainbridge, Kathleen E. Fradkin, Judith E. |
author_sort | Cowie, Catherine C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS: Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2827508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28275082011-03-01 Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 Cowie, Catherine C. Rust, Keith F. Byrd-Holt, Danita D. Gregg, Edward W. Ford, Earl S. Geiss, Linda S. Bainbridge, Kathleen E. Fradkin, Judith E. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS: Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected. American Diabetes Association 2010-03 2010-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2827508/ /pubmed/20067953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cowie, Catherine C. Rust, Keith F. Byrd-Holt, Danita D. Gregg, Edward W. Ford, Earl S. Geiss, Linda S. Bainbridge, Kathleen E. Fradkin, Judith E. Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 |
title | Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 |
title_full | Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 |
title_short | Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 |
title_sort | prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using a1c criteria in the u.s. population in 1988–2006 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cowiecatherinec prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT rustkeithf prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT byrdholtdanitad prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT greggedwardw prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT fordearls prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT geisslindas prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT bainbridgekathleene prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 AT fradkinjudithe prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006 |