Cargando…

Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006

OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cowie, Catherine C., Rust, Keith F., Byrd-Holt, Danita D., Gregg, Edward W., Ford, Earl S., Geiss, Linda S., Bainbridge, Kathleen E., Fradkin, Judith E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067953
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524
_version_ 1782177953845608448
author Cowie, Catherine C.
Rust, Keith F.
Byrd-Holt, Danita D.
Gregg, Edward W.
Ford, Earl S.
Geiss, Linda S.
Bainbridge, Kathleen E.
Fradkin, Judith E.
author_facet Cowie, Catherine C.
Rust, Keith F.
Byrd-Holt, Danita D.
Gregg, Edward W.
Ford, Earl S.
Geiss, Linda S.
Bainbridge, Kathleen E.
Fradkin, Judith E.
author_sort Cowie, Catherine C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS: Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected.
format Text
id pubmed-2827508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28275082011-03-01 Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006 Cowie, Catherine C. Rust, Keith F. Byrd-Holt, Danita D. Gregg, Edward W. Ford, Earl S. Geiss, Linda S. Bainbridge, Kathleen E. Fradkin, Judith E. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS: Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected. American Diabetes Association 2010-03 2010-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2827508/ /pubmed/20067953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cowie, Catherine C.
Rust, Keith F.
Byrd-Holt, Danita D.
Gregg, Edward W.
Ford, Earl S.
Geiss, Linda S.
Bainbridge, Kathleen E.
Fradkin, Judith E.
Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
title Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
title_full Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
title_fullStr Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
title_short Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
title_sort prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using a1c criteria in the u.s. population in 1988–2006
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067953
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524
work_keys_str_mv AT cowiecatherinec prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT rustkeithf prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT byrdholtdanitad prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT greggedwardw prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT fordearls prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT geisslindas prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT bainbridgekathleene prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006
AT fradkinjudithe prevalenceofdiabetesandhighriskfordiabetesusinga1ccriteriaintheuspopulationin19882006