Cargando…

Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?

OBJECTIVE: Using the clamp technique, youths with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (CDx-type 2 diabetes) and positive pancreatic autoantibodies (Ab(+)) were shown to have severe impairment in insulin secretion and less insulin resistance than their peers with negative antibodies (Ab(−)). In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tfayli, Hala, Bacha, Fida, Gungor, Neslihan, Arslanian, Silva
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20028940
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0305
_version_ 1782177957132894208
author Tfayli, Hala
Bacha, Fida
Gungor, Neslihan
Arslanian, Silva
author_facet Tfayli, Hala
Bacha, Fida
Gungor, Neslihan
Arslanian, Silva
author_sort Tfayli, Hala
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Using the clamp technique, youths with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (CDx-type 2 diabetes) and positive pancreatic autoantibodies (Ab(+)) were shown to have severe impairment in insulin secretion and less insulin resistance than their peers with negative antibodies (Ab(−)). In this study, we investigated whether oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived indexes of insulin secretion and sensitivity could distinguish between these two groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 25 Ab(−), 11 Ab(+) CDx-type 2 diabetic, and 21 obese control youths had an OGTT. Fasting and OGTT-derived indexes of insulin sensitivity (including the Matsuda index, homeostasis model assessment [HOMA] of insulin resistance, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, and glucose-to-insulin ratio) and insulin secretion (HOMA of insulin secretion and 30-min insulogenic and C-peptide indexes) were used. Glucagon and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 responses were assessed. RESULTS: Fasting C-peptide and C-peptide–to–glucose ratio, and C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower in the Ab(+) CDx-type 2 diabetic patients. Other OGTT-derived surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity and secretion were not different between the Ab(+) versus Ab(−) patients. GLP-1 during the OGTT was highest in the Ab(+) youths compared with the other two groups, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for BMI. Ab(+) and Ab(−) CDx-type 2 diabetes had relative hyperglucagonemia compared with control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical measures of fasting and OGTT-derived surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity and secretion, except for fasting C-peptide and C-peptide AUC, are less sensitive tools to distinguish metabolic/pathopysiological differences, detected by the clamp, between Ab(+) and Ab(−) CDx-type 2 diabetic youths. This underscores the importance of using more sensitive methods and the importance of determining antibody status in obese youths with CDx-type 2 diabetes.
format Text
id pubmed-2827522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28275222011-03-01 Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two? Tfayli, Hala Bacha, Fida Gungor, Neslihan Arslanian, Silva Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Using the clamp technique, youths with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (CDx-type 2 diabetes) and positive pancreatic autoantibodies (Ab(+)) were shown to have severe impairment in insulin secretion and less insulin resistance than their peers with negative antibodies (Ab(−)). In this study, we investigated whether oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived indexes of insulin secretion and sensitivity could distinguish between these two groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 25 Ab(−), 11 Ab(+) CDx-type 2 diabetic, and 21 obese control youths had an OGTT. Fasting and OGTT-derived indexes of insulin sensitivity (including the Matsuda index, homeostasis model assessment [HOMA] of insulin resistance, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, and glucose-to-insulin ratio) and insulin secretion (HOMA of insulin secretion and 30-min insulogenic and C-peptide indexes) were used. Glucagon and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 responses were assessed. RESULTS: Fasting C-peptide and C-peptide–to–glucose ratio, and C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower in the Ab(+) CDx-type 2 diabetic patients. Other OGTT-derived surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity and secretion were not different between the Ab(+) versus Ab(−) patients. GLP-1 during the OGTT was highest in the Ab(+) youths compared with the other two groups, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for BMI. Ab(+) and Ab(−) CDx-type 2 diabetes had relative hyperglucagonemia compared with control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical measures of fasting and OGTT-derived surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity and secretion, except for fasting C-peptide and C-peptide AUC, are less sensitive tools to distinguish metabolic/pathopysiological differences, detected by the clamp, between Ab(+) and Ab(−) CDx-type 2 diabetic youths. This underscores the importance of using more sensitive methods and the importance of determining antibody status in obese youths with CDx-type 2 diabetes. American Diabetes Association 2010-03 2009-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2827522/ /pubmed/20028940 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0305 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tfayli, Hala
Bacha, Fida
Gungor, Neslihan
Arslanian, Silva
Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
title Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
title_full Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
title_fullStr Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
title_full_unstemmed Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
title_short Islet Cell Antibody–Positive Versus –Negative Phenotypic Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: Does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
title_sort islet cell antibody–positive versus –negative phenotypic type 2 diabetes in youth: does the oral glucose tolerance test distinguish between the two?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20028940
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0305
work_keys_str_mv AT tfaylihala isletcellantibodypositiveversusnegativephenotypictype2diabetesinyouthdoestheoralglucosetolerancetestdistinguishbetweenthetwo
AT bachafida isletcellantibodypositiveversusnegativephenotypictype2diabetesinyouthdoestheoralglucosetolerancetestdistinguishbetweenthetwo
AT gungorneslihan isletcellantibodypositiveversusnegativephenotypictype2diabetesinyouthdoestheoralglucosetolerancetestdistinguishbetweenthetwo
AT arslaniansilva isletcellantibodypositiveversusnegativephenotypictype2diabetesinyouthdoestheoralglucosetolerancetestdistinguishbetweenthetwo