Cargando…

A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?

Background: Successful skin grafting requires multiple factors for success. An even distribution of constant pressure exerted upon the graft is necessary for successful graft take. It is well known that excessive pressure on a graft causes ischemia and may result in the failure of graft take. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wetton, Lara, Kwei, Johnny, Kippen, John, Nicklin, Sean, Gillies, Mark, Walsh, William R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20204059
_version_ 1782178083582771200
author Wetton, Lara
Kwei, Johnny
Kippen, John
Nicklin, Sean
Gillies, Mark
Walsh, William R.
author_facet Wetton, Lara
Kwei, Johnny
Kippen, John
Nicklin, Sean
Gillies, Mark
Walsh, William R.
author_sort Wetton, Lara
collection PubMed
description Background: Successful skin grafting requires multiple factors for success. An even distribution of constant pressure exerted upon the graft is necessary for successful graft take. It is well known that excessive pressure on a graft causes ischemia and may result in the failure of graft take. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the variation in skin pressure (tension) on curved surfaces, particularly relating to apical pressure on such surfaces at standard atmospheric pressure. Methods: A synthetic Sawbone skull model was used to determine skin tension over a curved surface. A 10-cm diameter circle was centered on the parietal eminence, the area of maximum curvature. Peripheral screws gave fixed reproducible points to secure the foam dressing. Open-cell VAC dressing foam was used and calibrated Tekscan sensors were used to determine pressure variation under the foam dressing. Results: Five hundred pressure readings were obtained for the unscored foam, and an additional 500 for the cross-scored foam. In the unscored foam, the pressure under the dressing was significantly higher at the apex. Cross-scoring the foam reduced the pressure, with the greatest reduction being at the apex. The pressure under the foam dressing was maximal at the apical point (95% confidence interval). Conclusion: Higher contact force at the apex of a curved graft bed may explain skin graft loss. Unequal pressure distribution can be reduced and equalized by scoring the foam.
format Text
id pubmed-2829197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28291972010-03-04 A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss? Wetton, Lara Kwei, Johnny Kippen, John Nicklin, Sean Gillies, Mark Walsh, William R. Eplasty Journal Article Background: Successful skin grafting requires multiple factors for success. An even distribution of constant pressure exerted upon the graft is necessary for successful graft take. It is well known that excessive pressure on a graft causes ischemia and may result in the failure of graft take. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the variation in skin pressure (tension) on curved surfaces, particularly relating to apical pressure on such surfaces at standard atmospheric pressure. Methods: A synthetic Sawbone skull model was used to determine skin tension over a curved surface. A 10-cm diameter circle was centered on the parietal eminence, the area of maximum curvature. Peripheral screws gave fixed reproducible points to secure the foam dressing. Open-cell VAC dressing foam was used and calibrated Tekscan sensors were used to determine pressure variation under the foam dressing. Results: Five hundred pressure readings were obtained for the unscored foam, and an additional 500 for the cross-scored foam. In the unscored foam, the pressure under the dressing was significantly higher at the apex. Cross-scoring the foam reduced the pressure, with the greatest reduction being at the apex. The pressure under the foam dressing was maximal at the apical point (95% confidence interval). Conclusion: Higher contact force at the apex of a curved graft bed may explain skin graft loss. Unequal pressure distribution can be reduced and equalized by scoring the foam. Open Science Company, LLC 2010-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2829197/ /pubmed/20204059 Text en Copyright © 2010 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Wetton, Lara
Kwei, Johnny
Kippen, John
Nicklin, Sean
Gillies, Mark
Walsh, William R.
A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?
title A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?
title_full A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?
title_fullStr A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?
title_full_unstemmed A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?
title_short A Model of Pressure Distribution Under Peripherally Secured Foam Dressings on a Convex Surface: Does This Contribute to Skin Graft Loss?
title_sort model of pressure distribution under peripherally secured foam dressings on a convex surface: does this contribute to skin graft loss?
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20204059
work_keys_str_mv AT wettonlara amodelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT kweijohnny amodelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT kippenjohn amodelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT nicklinsean amodelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT gilliesmark amodelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT walshwilliamr amodelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT wettonlara modelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT kweijohnny modelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT kippenjohn modelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT nicklinsean modelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT gilliesmark modelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss
AT walshwilliamr modelofpressuredistributionunderperipherallysecuredfoamdressingsonaconvexsurfacedoesthiscontributetoskingraftloss