Cargando…
Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-6 |
_version_ | 1782178093879787520 |
---|---|
author | Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco Martinez-Soto, Jose Rosenthal, Victor D |
author_facet | Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco Martinez-Soto, Jose Rosenthal, Victor D |
author_sort | Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (CLAB) because they allow the entry of air into the system, thereby also providing an opportunity for microbial entry. Closed infusion containers were designed to overcome this flaw. However, open infusion containers are still widely used throughout the world. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of switching from open (glass, burettes, and semi-rigid) infusion containers to closed, fully collapsible, plastic infusion containers (Viaflex(®)) on the rate and time to onset of central line-associated bloodstream infections CLABs. METHODS: An open label, prospective cohort, active healthcare-associated infection surveillance, sequential study was conducted in four ICUs in Mexico. Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systems definitions were used to define device-associated infections. RESULTS: A total of 1,096 adult patients who had a central line in place for >24 hours were enrolled. The CLAB rate was significantly higher during the open versus the closed container period (16.1 versus 3.2 CLAB/1000 central line days; RR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.36, P < 0.0001). The probability of developing CLAB remained relatively constant in the closed container period (1.4% Days 2-4 to 0.5% Days 8-10), but increased in the open container period (4.9% Days 2-4 to 5.4% Days 8-10). The chance of acquiring a CLAB was significantly decreased (81%) in the closed container period (Cox proportional hazard ratio 0.19, P < 0.0001). Mortality was statistically significantly lower during the closed versus the open container period (23.4% versus 16.1%; RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.54-0.88, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Closed infusion containers significantly reduced CLAB rate, the probability of acquiring CLAB, and mortality. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2829484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28294842010-02-28 Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco Martinez-Soto, Jose Rosenthal, Victor D Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (CLAB) because they allow the entry of air into the system, thereby also providing an opportunity for microbial entry. Closed infusion containers were designed to overcome this flaw. However, open infusion containers are still widely used throughout the world. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of switching from open (glass, burettes, and semi-rigid) infusion containers to closed, fully collapsible, plastic infusion containers (Viaflex(®)) on the rate and time to onset of central line-associated bloodstream infections CLABs. METHODS: An open label, prospective cohort, active healthcare-associated infection surveillance, sequential study was conducted in four ICUs in Mexico. Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systems definitions were used to define device-associated infections. RESULTS: A total of 1,096 adult patients who had a central line in place for >24 hours were enrolled. The CLAB rate was significantly higher during the open versus the closed container period (16.1 versus 3.2 CLAB/1000 central line days; RR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.36, P < 0.0001). The probability of developing CLAB remained relatively constant in the closed container period (1.4% Days 2-4 to 0.5% Days 8-10), but increased in the open container period (4.9% Days 2-4 to 5.4% Days 8-10). The chance of acquiring a CLAB was significantly decreased (81%) in the closed container period (Cox proportional hazard ratio 0.19, P < 0.0001). Mortality was statistically significantly lower during the closed versus the open container period (23.4% versus 16.1%; RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.54-0.88, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Closed infusion containers significantly reduced CLAB rate, the probability of acquiring CLAB, and mortality. BioMed Central 2010-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2829484/ /pubmed/20122280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-6 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rangel-Frausto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco Martinez-Soto, Jose Rosenthal, Victor D Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
title | Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
title_full | Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
title_fullStr | Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
title_short | Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
title_sort | should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rangelfraustomanuels shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections AT higueraramirezfrancisco shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections AT martinezsotojose shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections AT rosenthalvictord shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections |