Cargando…

Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S, Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco, Martinez-Soto, Jose, Rosenthal, Victor D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-6
_version_ 1782178093879787520
author Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S
Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco
Martinez-Soto, Jose
Rosenthal, Victor D
author_facet Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S
Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco
Martinez-Soto, Jose
Rosenthal, Victor D
author_sort Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (CLAB) because they allow the entry of air into the system, thereby also providing an opportunity for microbial entry. Closed infusion containers were designed to overcome this flaw. However, open infusion containers are still widely used throughout the world. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of switching from open (glass, burettes, and semi-rigid) infusion containers to closed, fully collapsible, plastic infusion containers (Viaflex(®)) on the rate and time to onset of central line-associated bloodstream infections CLABs. METHODS: An open label, prospective cohort, active healthcare-associated infection surveillance, sequential study was conducted in four ICUs in Mexico. Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systems definitions were used to define device-associated infections. RESULTS: A total of 1,096 adult patients who had a central line in place for >24 hours were enrolled. The CLAB rate was significantly higher during the open versus the closed container period (16.1 versus 3.2 CLAB/1000 central line days; RR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.36, P < 0.0001). The probability of developing CLAB remained relatively constant in the closed container period (1.4% Days 2-4 to 0.5% Days 8-10), but increased in the open container period (4.9% Days 2-4 to 5.4% Days 8-10). The chance of acquiring a CLAB was significantly decreased (81%) in the closed container period (Cox proportional hazard ratio 0.19, P < 0.0001). Mortality was statistically significantly lower during the closed versus the open container period (23.4% versus 16.1%; RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.54-0.88, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Closed infusion containers significantly reduced CLAB rate, the probability of acquiring CLAB, and mortality.
format Text
id pubmed-2829484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28294842010-02-28 Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco Martinez-Soto, Jose Rosenthal, Victor D Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (CLAB) because they allow the entry of air into the system, thereby also providing an opportunity for microbial entry. Closed infusion containers were designed to overcome this flaw. However, open infusion containers are still widely used throughout the world. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of switching from open (glass, burettes, and semi-rigid) infusion containers to closed, fully collapsible, plastic infusion containers (Viaflex(®)) on the rate and time to onset of central line-associated bloodstream infections CLABs. METHODS: An open label, prospective cohort, active healthcare-associated infection surveillance, sequential study was conducted in four ICUs in Mexico. Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Systems definitions were used to define device-associated infections. RESULTS: A total of 1,096 adult patients who had a central line in place for >24 hours were enrolled. The CLAB rate was significantly higher during the open versus the closed container period (16.1 versus 3.2 CLAB/1000 central line days; RR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.36, P < 0.0001). The probability of developing CLAB remained relatively constant in the closed container period (1.4% Days 2-4 to 0.5% Days 8-10), but increased in the open container period (4.9% Days 2-4 to 5.4% Days 8-10). The chance of acquiring a CLAB was significantly decreased (81%) in the closed container period (Cox proportional hazard ratio 0.19, P < 0.0001). Mortality was statistically significantly lower during the closed versus the open container period (23.4% versus 16.1%; RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.54-0.88, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Closed infusion containers significantly reduced CLAB rate, the probability of acquiring CLAB, and mortality. BioMed Central 2010-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2829484/ /pubmed/20122280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-6 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rangel-Frausto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rangel-Frausto, Manuel S
Higuera-Ramirez, Francisco
Martinez-Soto, Jose
Rosenthal, Victor D
Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
title Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
title_full Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
title_fullStr Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
title_full_unstemmed Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
title_short Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
title_sort should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rangelfraustomanuels shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections
AT higueraramirezfrancisco shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections
AT martinezsotojose shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections
AT rosenthalvictord shouldweuseclosedoropeninfusioncontainersforpreventionofbloodstreaminfections