Cargando…

Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units

BACKGROUND: Screening and isolation are central components of hospital methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control policies. Their prevention of patient-to-patient spread depends on minimizing undetected and unisolated MRSA-positive patient days. Estimating these MRSA-positive patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kypraios, Theodore, O'Neill, Philip D, Huang, Susan S, Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L, Cooper, Ben S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20158891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-29
_version_ 1782178114259910656
author Kypraios, Theodore
O'Neill, Philip D
Huang, Susan S
Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L
Cooper, Ben S
author_facet Kypraios, Theodore
O'Neill, Philip D
Huang, Susan S
Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L
Cooper, Ben S
author_sort Kypraios, Theodore
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening and isolation are central components of hospital methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control policies. Their prevention of patient-to-patient spread depends on minimizing undetected and unisolated MRSA-positive patient days. Estimating these MRSA-positive patient days and the reduction in transmission due to isolation presents a major methodological challenge, but is essential for assessing both the value of existing control policies and the potential benefit of new rapid MRSA detection technologies. Recent methodological developments have made it possible to estimate these quantities using routine surveillance data. METHODS: Colonization data from admission and weekly nares cultures were collected from eight single-bed adult intensive care units (ICUs) over 17 months. Detected MRSA-positive patients were isolated using single rooms and barrier precautions. Data were analyzed using stochastic transmission models and model fitting was performed within a Bayesian framework using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, imputing unobserved MRSA carriage events. RESULTS: Models estimated the mean percent of colonized-patient-days attributed to undetected carriers as 14.1% (95% CI (11.7, 16.5)) averaged across ICUs. The percent of colonized-patient-days attributed to patients awaiting results averaged 7.8% (6.2, 9.2). Overall, the ratio of estimated transmission rates from unisolated MRSA-positive patients and those under barrier precautions was 1.34 (0.45, 3.97), but varied widely across ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Screening consistently detected >80% of colonized-patient-days. Estimates of the effectiveness of barrier precautions showed considerable uncertainty, but in all units except burns/general surgery and one cardiac surgery ICU, the best estimates were consistent with reductions in transmission associated with barrier precautions.
format Text
id pubmed-2829569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28295692010-02-28 Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units Kypraios, Theodore O'Neill, Philip D Huang, Susan S Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L Cooper, Ben S BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening and isolation are central components of hospital methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control policies. Their prevention of patient-to-patient spread depends on minimizing undetected and unisolated MRSA-positive patient days. Estimating these MRSA-positive patient days and the reduction in transmission due to isolation presents a major methodological challenge, but is essential for assessing both the value of existing control policies and the potential benefit of new rapid MRSA detection technologies. Recent methodological developments have made it possible to estimate these quantities using routine surveillance data. METHODS: Colonization data from admission and weekly nares cultures were collected from eight single-bed adult intensive care units (ICUs) over 17 months. Detected MRSA-positive patients were isolated using single rooms and barrier precautions. Data were analyzed using stochastic transmission models and model fitting was performed within a Bayesian framework using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, imputing unobserved MRSA carriage events. RESULTS: Models estimated the mean percent of colonized-patient-days attributed to undetected carriers as 14.1% (95% CI (11.7, 16.5)) averaged across ICUs. The percent of colonized-patient-days attributed to patients awaiting results averaged 7.8% (6.2, 9.2). Overall, the ratio of estimated transmission rates from unisolated MRSA-positive patients and those under barrier precautions was 1.34 (0.45, 3.97), but varied widely across ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Screening consistently detected >80% of colonized-patient-days. Estimates of the effectiveness of barrier precautions showed considerable uncertainty, but in all units except burns/general surgery and one cardiac surgery ICU, the best estimates were consistent with reductions in transmission associated with barrier precautions. BioMed Central 2010-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2829569/ /pubmed/20158891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-29 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kypraios et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kypraios, Theodore
O'Neill, Philip D
Huang, Susan S
Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L
Cooper, Ben S
Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
title Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
title_full Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
title_fullStr Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
title_short Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
title_sort assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20158891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-29
work_keys_str_mv AT kypraiostheodore assessingtheroleofundetectedcolonizationandisolationprecautionsinreducingmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureustransmissioninintensivecareunits
AT oneillphilipd assessingtheroleofundetectedcolonizationandisolationprecautionsinreducingmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureustransmissioninintensivecareunits
AT huangsusans assessingtheroleofundetectedcolonizationandisolationprecautionsinreducingmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureustransmissioninintensivecareunits
AT rifasshimansheryll assessingtheroleofundetectedcolonizationandisolationprecautionsinreducingmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureustransmissioninintensivecareunits
AT cooperbens assessingtheroleofundetectedcolonizationandisolationprecautionsinreducingmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureustransmissioninintensivecareunits