Cargando…

Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler

Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend the regular use of inhaled bronchodilator therapy in order to relieve symptoms and prevent exacerbations. A variety of inhaler devices are currently available to COPD patients, and the choice of device is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodder, Richard, Price, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888356
_version_ 1782178127453093888
author Hodder, Richard
Price, David
author_facet Hodder, Richard
Price, David
author_sort Hodder, Richard
collection PubMed
description Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend the regular use of inhaled bronchodilator therapy in order to relieve symptoms and prevent exacerbations. A variety of inhaler devices are currently available to COPD patients, and the choice of device is an important consideration because it can influence patients’ adherence to treatment, and thus potentially affect the long-term outcome. The Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler (SMI) generates a slow-moving aerosol with a high fine particle fraction, resulting in deposition of a higher proportion of the dose in the lungs than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) or some dry powder inhalers (DPIs). We review clinical studies of inhaler satisfaction and preference comparing Respimat(®) SMI against other inhalers in COPD patients. Using objective and validated patient satisfaction instruments, Respimat(®) SMI was consistently shown to be well accepted by COPD patients, largely due to its inhalation and handling characteristics. In comparative studies with pMDIs, the patient total satisfaction score with Respimat(®) SMI was statistically and clinically significantly higher than with the pMDI. In comparative studies with DPIs, the total satisfaction score was statistically significantly higher than for the Turbuhaler(®) DPI, but only the performance domain of satisfaction was clinically significantly higher for Respimat(®) SMI. Whether the observed higher levels of patient satisfaction reported with Respimat(®) SMI might be expected to result in improved adherence to therapy and thus provide benefits consistent with those recently shown to be associated with sustained bronchodilator treatment in patients with COPD remains to be proven.
format Text
id pubmed-2829861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28298612010-03-02 Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler Hodder, Richard Price, David Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Review Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend the regular use of inhaled bronchodilator therapy in order to relieve symptoms and prevent exacerbations. A variety of inhaler devices are currently available to COPD patients, and the choice of device is an important consideration because it can influence patients’ adherence to treatment, and thus potentially affect the long-term outcome. The Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler (SMI) generates a slow-moving aerosol with a high fine particle fraction, resulting in deposition of a higher proportion of the dose in the lungs than pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) or some dry powder inhalers (DPIs). We review clinical studies of inhaler satisfaction and preference comparing Respimat(®) SMI against other inhalers in COPD patients. Using objective and validated patient satisfaction instruments, Respimat(®) SMI was consistently shown to be well accepted by COPD patients, largely due to its inhalation and handling characteristics. In comparative studies with pMDIs, the patient total satisfaction score with Respimat(®) SMI was statistically and clinically significantly higher than with the pMDI. In comparative studies with DPIs, the total satisfaction score was statistically significantly higher than for the Turbuhaler(®) DPI, but only the performance domain of satisfaction was clinically significantly higher for Respimat(®) SMI. Whether the observed higher levels of patient satisfaction reported with Respimat(®) SMI might be expected to result in improved adherence to therapy and thus provide benefits consistent with those recently shown to be associated with sustained bronchodilator treatment in patients with COPD remains to be proven. Dove Medical Press 2009 2009-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2829861/ /pubmed/19888356 Text en © 2009 Hodder and Price, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Hodder, Richard
Price, David
Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler
title Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler
title_full Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler
title_fullStr Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler
title_short Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat(®) Soft Mist(™) Inhaler
title_sort patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with respimat(®) soft mist(™) inhaler
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888356
work_keys_str_mv AT hodderrichard patientpreferencesforinhalerdevicesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexperiencewithrespimatsoftmistinhaler
AT pricedavid patientpreferencesforinhalerdevicesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseexperiencewithrespimatsoftmistinhaler