Cargando…

A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Some probiotics have shown efficacy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Lactobacillus (L.) plantarum MF1298 was found to have the best in vitro probiotic properties of 22 strains of lactobacilli. The aim of this study was to investigate the symptomatic effect of L. plantaru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ligaarden, Solveig C, Axelsson, Lars, Naterstad, Kristine, Lydersen, Stian, Farup, Per G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20144246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-16
_version_ 1782178209942470656
author Ligaarden, Solveig C
Axelsson, Lars
Naterstad, Kristine
Lydersen, Stian
Farup, Per G
author_facet Ligaarden, Solveig C
Axelsson, Lars
Naterstad, Kristine
Lydersen, Stian
Farup, Per G
author_sort Ligaarden, Solveig C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some probiotics have shown efficacy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Lactobacillus (L.) plantarum MF1298 was found to have the best in vitro probiotic properties of 22 strains of lactobacilli. The aim of this study was to investigate the symptomatic effect of L. plantarum MF1298 in subjects with IBS. Primary outcome was treatment preference and secondary outcomes were number of weeks with satisfactory relief of symptoms and IBS sum score. METHODS: The design was a randomised double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. 16 subjects with IBS underwent two three-week periods of daily intake of one capsule of 10(10 )CFU L. plantarum MF 1298 or placebo separated by a four-week washout period. RESULTS: Thirteen participants (81%; 95% CI 57% to 93%; P = 0.012) preferred placebo to L. plantarum MF1298 treatment. The mean (SD) number of weeks with satisfactory relief of symptoms in the periods with L. plantarum MF1298 and placebo were 0.50 (0.89) and 1.44 (1.26), respectively (P = 0.006). IBS sum score was 6.44 (1.81) in the period with L. plantarum MF1298 treatment compared with 5.35 (1.77) in the period with placebo (P = 0.010). With a clinically significant difference in the IBS sum score of 2 in disfavour of active treatment, the number needed to harm was 3.7, 95% CI 2.3 to 10.9. CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows for the first time an unfavourable effect on symptoms in subjects with IBS after intake of a potential probiotic. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials NCT00355810.
format Text
id pubmed-2831047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28310472010-03-03 A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial Ligaarden, Solveig C Axelsson, Lars Naterstad, Kristine Lydersen, Stian Farup, Per G BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Some probiotics have shown efficacy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Lactobacillus (L.) plantarum MF1298 was found to have the best in vitro probiotic properties of 22 strains of lactobacilli. The aim of this study was to investigate the symptomatic effect of L. plantarum MF1298 in subjects with IBS. Primary outcome was treatment preference and secondary outcomes were number of weeks with satisfactory relief of symptoms and IBS sum score. METHODS: The design was a randomised double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. 16 subjects with IBS underwent two three-week periods of daily intake of one capsule of 10(10 )CFU L. plantarum MF 1298 or placebo separated by a four-week washout period. RESULTS: Thirteen participants (81%; 95% CI 57% to 93%; P = 0.012) preferred placebo to L. plantarum MF1298 treatment. The mean (SD) number of weeks with satisfactory relief of symptoms in the periods with L. plantarum MF1298 and placebo were 0.50 (0.89) and 1.44 (1.26), respectively (P = 0.006). IBS sum score was 6.44 (1.81) in the period with L. plantarum MF1298 treatment compared with 5.35 (1.77) in the period with placebo (P = 0.010). With a clinically significant difference in the IBS sum score of 2 in disfavour of active treatment, the number needed to harm was 3.7, 95% CI 2.3 to 10.9. CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows for the first time an unfavourable effect on symptoms in subjects with IBS after intake of a potential probiotic. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials NCT00355810. BioMed Central 2010-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2831047/ /pubmed/20144246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-16 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ligaarden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ligaarden, Solveig C
Axelsson, Lars
Naterstad, Kristine
Lydersen, Stian
Farup, Per G
A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
title A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
title_full A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
title_short A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20144246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-16
work_keys_str_mv AT ligaardensolveigc acandidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT axelssonlars acandidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT naterstadkristine acandidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lydersenstian acandidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT farupperg acandidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ligaardensolveigc candidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT axelssonlars candidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT naterstadkristine candidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lydersenstian candidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT farupperg candidateprobioticwithunfavourableeffectsinsubjectswithirritablebowelsyndromearandomisedcontrolledtrial