Cargando…
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam
Dissemination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the United States coincided with an increasing incidence of prostate cancer, a shift to earlier stage disease at diagnosis, and decreasing prostate cancer mortality. We compared PSA screening performance with respect to prostate cancer dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp533 |
_version_ | 1782178210194128896 |
---|---|
author | Wever, Elisabeth M. Draisma, Gerrit Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. Roobol, Monique J. Boer, Rob Otto, Suzie J. de Koning, Harry J. |
author_facet | Wever, Elisabeth M. Draisma, Gerrit Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. Roobol, Monique J. Boer, Rob Otto, Suzie J. de Koning, Harry J. |
author_sort | Wever, Elisabeth M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dissemination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the United States coincided with an increasing incidence of prostate cancer, a shift to earlier stage disease at diagnosis, and decreasing prostate cancer mortality. We compared PSA screening performance with respect to prostate cancer detection in the US population vs in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC–Rotterdam). We developed a simulation model for prostate cancer and PSA screening for ERSPC–Rotterdam. This model was then adapted to the US population by replacing demography parameters with US-specific ones and the screening protocol with the frequency of PSA tests in the US population. We assumed that the natural progression of prostate cancer and the sensitivity of a PSA test followed by a biopsy were the same in the United States as in ERSPC–Rotterdam. The predicted prostate cancer incidence peak in the United States was then substantially higher than the observed prostate cancer incidence peak (13.3 vs 8.1 cases per 1000 man-years). However, the actual observed incidence was reproduced by assuming a substantially lower PSA test sensitivity in the United States than in ERSPC–Rotterdam. For example, for nonpalpable local- or regional-stage cancers (ie, stage T1M0), the estimates of PSA test sensitivity were 0.26 in the United States vs 0.94 in ERSPC–Rotterdam. We conclude that the efficacy of PSA screening in detecting prostate cancer was lower in the United States than in ERSPC–Rotterdam. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2831048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28310482010-03-04 Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam Wever, Elisabeth M. Draisma, Gerrit Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. Roobol, Monique J. Boer, Rob Otto, Suzie J. de Koning, Harry J. J Natl Cancer Inst Brief Communication Dissemination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the United States coincided with an increasing incidence of prostate cancer, a shift to earlier stage disease at diagnosis, and decreasing prostate cancer mortality. We compared PSA screening performance with respect to prostate cancer detection in the US population vs in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC–Rotterdam). We developed a simulation model for prostate cancer and PSA screening for ERSPC–Rotterdam. This model was then adapted to the US population by replacing demography parameters with US-specific ones and the screening protocol with the frequency of PSA tests in the US population. We assumed that the natural progression of prostate cancer and the sensitivity of a PSA test followed by a biopsy were the same in the United States as in ERSPC–Rotterdam. The predicted prostate cancer incidence peak in the United States was then substantially higher than the observed prostate cancer incidence peak (13.3 vs 8.1 cases per 1000 man-years). However, the actual observed incidence was reproduced by assuming a substantially lower PSA test sensitivity in the United States than in ERSPC–Rotterdam. For example, for nonpalpable local- or regional-stage cancers (ie, stage T1M0), the estimates of PSA test sensitivity were 0.26 in the United States vs 0.94 in ERSPC–Rotterdam. We conclude that the efficacy of PSA screening in detecting prostate cancer was lower in the United States than in ERSPC–Rotterdam. Oxford University Press 2010-03-03 2010-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2831048/ /pubmed/20142584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp533 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Wever, Elisabeth M. Draisma, Gerrit Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. Roobol, Monique J. Boer, Rob Otto, Suzie J. de Koning, Harry J. Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam |
title | Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam |
title_full | Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam |
title_fullStr | Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam |
title_short | Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in the United States vs in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer–Rotterdam |
title_sort | prostate-specific antigen screening in the united states vs in the european randomized study of screening for prostate cancer–rotterdam |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weverelisabethm prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam AT draismagerrit prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam AT heijnsdijkevelineam prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam AT roobolmoniquej prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam AT boerrob prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam AT ottosuziej prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam AT dekoningharryj prostatespecificantigenscreeningintheunitedstatesvsintheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerrotterdam |