Cargando…

Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant

Fixation failure of glenoid components is the main cause of unsuccessful total shoulder arthroplasties. The characteristics of these failures are still not well understood, hence, attempts at improving the implant fixation are somewhat blind and the failure rate remains high. This lack of understand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarah, Junaid, Sanjay, Gupta, Sanjay, Sanghavi, Carolyn, Anglin, Emery, Roger, Andrew, Amis, Ulrich, Hansen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19939390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.019
_version_ 1782178219551621120
author Sarah, Junaid
Sanjay, Gupta
Sanjay, Sanghavi
Carolyn, Anglin
Emery, Roger
Andrew, Amis
Ulrich, Hansen
author_facet Sarah, Junaid
Sanjay, Gupta
Sanjay, Sanghavi
Carolyn, Anglin
Emery, Roger
Andrew, Amis
Ulrich, Hansen
author_sort Sarah, Junaid
collection PubMed
description Fixation failure of glenoid components is the main cause of unsuccessful total shoulder arthroplasties. The characteristics of these failures are still not well understood, hence, attempts at improving the implant fixation are somewhat blind and the failure rate remains high. This lack of understanding is largely due to the fundamental problem that direct observations of failure are impossible as the fixation is inherently embedded within the bone. Twenty custom made implants, reflecting various common fixation designs, and a specimen set-up was prepared to enable direct observation of failure when the specimens were exposed to cyclic superior loads during laboratory experiments. Finite element analyses of the laboratory tests were also carried out to explain the observed failure scenarios. All implants, irrespective of the particular fixation design, failed at the implant–cement interface and failure initiated at the inferior part of the component fixation. Finite element analyses indicated that this failure scenario was caused by a weak and brittle implant–cement interface and tensile stresses in the inferior region possibly worsened by a stress raiser effect at the inferior rim. The results of this study indicate that glenoid failure can be delayed or prevented by improving the implant/cement interface strength. Also any design features that reduce the geometrical stress raiser and the inferior tensile stresses in general should delay implant loosening.
format Text
id pubmed-2831172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28311722010-04-13 Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant Sarah, Junaid Sanjay, Gupta Sanjay, Sanghavi Carolyn, Anglin Emery, Roger Andrew, Amis Ulrich, Hansen J Biomech Article Fixation failure of glenoid components is the main cause of unsuccessful total shoulder arthroplasties. The characteristics of these failures are still not well understood, hence, attempts at improving the implant fixation are somewhat blind and the failure rate remains high. This lack of understanding is largely due to the fundamental problem that direct observations of failure are impossible as the fixation is inherently embedded within the bone. Twenty custom made implants, reflecting various common fixation designs, and a specimen set-up was prepared to enable direct observation of failure when the specimens were exposed to cyclic superior loads during laboratory experiments. Finite element analyses of the laboratory tests were also carried out to explain the observed failure scenarios. All implants, irrespective of the particular fixation design, failed at the implant–cement interface and failure initiated at the inferior part of the component fixation. Finite element analyses indicated that this failure scenario was caused by a weak and brittle implant–cement interface and tensile stresses in the inferior region possibly worsened by a stress raiser effect at the inferior rim. The results of this study indicate that glenoid failure can be delayed or prevented by improving the implant/cement interface strength. Also any design features that reduce the geometrical stress raiser and the inferior tensile stresses in general should delay implant loosening. Elsevier Science 2010-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2831172/ /pubmed/19939390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.019 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Sarah, Junaid
Sanjay, Gupta
Sanjay, Sanghavi
Carolyn, Anglin
Emery, Roger
Andrew, Amis
Ulrich, Hansen
Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
title Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
title_full Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
title_fullStr Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
title_full_unstemmed Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
title_short Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
title_sort failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19939390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.019
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahjunaid failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant
AT sanjaygupta failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant
AT sanjaysanghavi failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant
AT carolynanglin failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant
AT emeryroger failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant
AT andrewamis failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant
AT ulrichhansen failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant