Cargando…
Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant
Fixation failure of glenoid components is the main cause of unsuccessful total shoulder arthroplasties. The characteristics of these failures are still not well understood, hence, attempts at improving the implant fixation are somewhat blind and the failure rate remains high. This lack of understand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19939390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.019 |
_version_ | 1782178219551621120 |
---|---|
author | Sarah, Junaid Sanjay, Gupta Sanjay, Sanghavi Carolyn, Anglin Emery, Roger Andrew, Amis Ulrich, Hansen |
author_facet | Sarah, Junaid Sanjay, Gupta Sanjay, Sanghavi Carolyn, Anglin Emery, Roger Andrew, Amis Ulrich, Hansen |
author_sort | Sarah, Junaid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fixation failure of glenoid components is the main cause of unsuccessful total shoulder arthroplasties. The characteristics of these failures are still not well understood, hence, attempts at improving the implant fixation are somewhat blind and the failure rate remains high. This lack of understanding is largely due to the fundamental problem that direct observations of failure are impossible as the fixation is inherently embedded within the bone. Twenty custom made implants, reflecting various common fixation designs, and a specimen set-up was prepared to enable direct observation of failure when the specimens were exposed to cyclic superior loads during laboratory experiments. Finite element analyses of the laboratory tests were also carried out to explain the observed failure scenarios. All implants, irrespective of the particular fixation design, failed at the implant–cement interface and failure initiated at the inferior part of the component fixation. Finite element analyses indicated that this failure scenario was caused by a weak and brittle implant–cement interface and tensile stresses in the inferior region possibly worsened by a stress raiser effect at the inferior rim. The results of this study indicate that glenoid failure can be delayed or prevented by improving the implant/cement interface strength. Also any design features that reduce the geometrical stress raiser and the inferior tensile stresses in general should delay implant loosening. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2831172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28311722010-04-13 Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant Sarah, Junaid Sanjay, Gupta Sanjay, Sanghavi Carolyn, Anglin Emery, Roger Andrew, Amis Ulrich, Hansen J Biomech Article Fixation failure of glenoid components is the main cause of unsuccessful total shoulder arthroplasties. The characteristics of these failures are still not well understood, hence, attempts at improving the implant fixation are somewhat blind and the failure rate remains high. This lack of understanding is largely due to the fundamental problem that direct observations of failure are impossible as the fixation is inherently embedded within the bone. Twenty custom made implants, reflecting various common fixation designs, and a specimen set-up was prepared to enable direct observation of failure when the specimens were exposed to cyclic superior loads during laboratory experiments. Finite element analyses of the laboratory tests were also carried out to explain the observed failure scenarios. All implants, irrespective of the particular fixation design, failed at the implant–cement interface and failure initiated at the inferior part of the component fixation. Finite element analyses indicated that this failure scenario was caused by a weak and brittle implant–cement interface and tensile stresses in the inferior region possibly worsened by a stress raiser effect at the inferior rim. The results of this study indicate that glenoid failure can be delayed or prevented by improving the implant/cement interface strength. Also any design features that reduce the geometrical stress raiser and the inferior tensile stresses in general should delay implant loosening. Elsevier Science 2010-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2831172/ /pubmed/19939390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.019 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Sarah, Junaid Sanjay, Gupta Sanjay, Sanghavi Carolyn, Anglin Emery, Roger Andrew, Amis Ulrich, Hansen Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
title | Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
title_full | Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
title_fullStr | Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
title_full_unstemmed | Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
title_short | Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
title_sort | failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19939390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahjunaid failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant AT sanjaygupta failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant AT sanjaysanghavi failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant AT carolynanglin failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant AT emeryroger failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant AT andrewamis failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant AT ulrichhansen failuremechanismoftheallpolyethyleneglenoidimplant |