Cargando…

Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care

Many psychological factors have been suggested to be important obstacles to recovery from low back pain, yet most studies focus on a limited number of factors. We compared a more comprehensive range of 20 factors in predicting outcome in primary care. Consecutive patients consulting 8 general practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Nadine E., Thomas, Elaine, Bishop, Annette, Dunn, Kate M., Main, Chris J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20022697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.002
_version_ 1782178219785453568
author Foster, Nadine E.
Thomas, Elaine
Bishop, Annette
Dunn, Kate M.
Main, Chris J.
author_facet Foster, Nadine E.
Thomas, Elaine
Bishop, Annette
Dunn, Kate M.
Main, Chris J.
author_sort Foster, Nadine E.
collection PubMed
description Many psychological factors have been suggested to be important obstacles to recovery from low back pain, yet most studies focus on a limited number of factors. We compared a more comprehensive range of 20 factors in predicting outcome in primary care. Consecutive patients consulting 8 general practices were eligible to take part in a prospective cohort study; 1591 provided data at baseline and 810 at 6 months. Clinical outcome was defined using the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The relative strength of the baseline psychological measures to predict outcome was investigated using adjusted multiple linear regression techniques. The sample was similar to other primary care cohorts (mean age 44 years, 59% women, mean baseline RMDQ 8.6). The 20 factors each accounted for between 0.04% and 33.3% of the variance in baseline RMDQ score. A multivariate model including all 11 scales that were associated with outcome in the univariate analysis accounted for 47.7% of the variance in 6 months RMDQ score; rising to 55.8% following adjustment. Four scales remained significantly associated with outcome in the multivariate model explaining 56.6% of the variance: perceptions of personal control, acute/chronic timeline, illness identify and pain self-efficacy. When all independent factors were included, depression, catastrophising and fear avoidance were no longer significant. Thus, a small number of psychological factors are strongly predictive of outcome in primary care low back pain patients. There is clear redundancy in the measurement of psychological factors. These findings should help to focus targeted interventions for back pain in the future.
format Text
id pubmed-2831173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28311732010-03-31 Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care Foster, Nadine E. Thomas, Elaine Bishop, Annette Dunn, Kate M. Main, Chris J. Pain Article Many psychological factors have been suggested to be important obstacles to recovery from low back pain, yet most studies focus on a limited number of factors. We compared a more comprehensive range of 20 factors in predicting outcome in primary care. Consecutive patients consulting 8 general practices were eligible to take part in a prospective cohort study; 1591 provided data at baseline and 810 at 6 months. Clinical outcome was defined using the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The relative strength of the baseline psychological measures to predict outcome was investigated using adjusted multiple linear regression techniques. The sample was similar to other primary care cohorts (mean age 44 years, 59% women, mean baseline RMDQ 8.6). The 20 factors each accounted for between 0.04% and 33.3% of the variance in baseline RMDQ score. A multivariate model including all 11 scales that were associated with outcome in the univariate analysis accounted for 47.7% of the variance in 6 months RMDQ score; rising to 55.8% following adjustment. Four scales remained significantly associated with outcome in the multivariate model explaining 56.6% of the variance: perceptions of personal control, acute/chronic timeline, illness identify and pain self-efficacy. When all independent factors were included, depression, catastrophising and fear avoidance were no longer significant. Thus, a small number of psychological factors are strongly predictive of outcome in primary care low back pain patients. There is clear redundancy in the measurement of psychological factors. These findings should help to focus targeted interventions for back pain in the future. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2010-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2831173/ /pubmed/20022697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.002 Text en © 2010 Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Foster, Nadine E.
Thomas, Elaine
Bishop, Annette
Dunn, Kate M.
Main, Chris J.
Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
title Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
title_full Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
title_fullStr Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
title_short Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
title_sort distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20022697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.002
work_keys_str_mv AT fosternadinee distinctivenessofpsychologicalobstaclestorecoveryinlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycare
AT thomaselaine distinctivenessofpsychologicalobstaclestorecoveryinlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycare
AT bishopannette distinctivenessofpsychologicalobstaclestorecoveryinlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycare
AT dunnkatem distinctivenessofpsychologicalobstaclestorecoveryinlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycare
AT mainchrisj distinctivenessofpsychologicalobstaclestorecoveryinlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycare