Cargando…

Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook

BACKGROUND: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics—Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21–23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Van...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Aggelen, Graham, Ankley, Gerald T., Baldwin, William S., Bearden, Daniel W., Benson, William H., Chipman, J. Kevin, Collette, Tim W., Craft, John A., Denslow, Nancy D., Embry, Michael R., Falciani, Francesco, George, Stephen G., Helbing, Caren C., Hoekstra, Paul F., Iguchi, Taisen, Kagami, Yoshi, Katsiadaki, Ioanna, Kille, Peter, Liu, Li, Lord, Peter G., McIntyre, Terry, O’Neill, Anne, Osachoff, Heather, Perkins, Ed J., Santos, Eduarda M., Skirrow, Rachel C., Snape, Jason R., Tyler, Charles R., Versteeg, Don, Viant, Mark R., Volz, David C., Williams, Tim D., Yu, Lorraine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20056575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900985
_version_ 1782178298163363840
author Van Aggelen, Graham
Ankley, Gerald T.
Baldwin, William S.
Bearden, Daniel W.
Benson, William H.
Chipman, J. Kevin
Collette, Tim W.
Craft, John A.
Denslow, Nancy D.
Embry, Michael R.
Falciani, Francesco
George, Stephen G.
Helbing, Caren C.
Hoekstra, Paul F.
Iguchi, Taisen
Kagami, Yoshi
Katsiadaki, Ioanna
Kille, Peter
Liu, Li
Lord, Peter G.
McIntyre, Terry
O’Neill, Anne
Osachoff, Heather
Perkins, Ed J.
Santos, Eduarda M.
Skirrow, Rachel C.
Snape, Jason R.
Tyler, Charles R.
Versteeg, Don
Viant, Mark R.
Volz, David C.
Williams, Tim D.
Yu, Lorraine
author_facet Van Aggelen, Graham
Ankley, Gerald T.
Baldwin, William S.
Bearden, Daniel W.
Benson, William H.
Chipman, J. Kevin
Collette, Tim W.
Craft, John A.
Denslow, Nancy D.
Embry, Michael R.
Falciani, Francesco
George, Stephen G.
Helbing, Caren C.
Hoekstra, Paul F.
Iguchi, Taisen
Kagami, Yoshi
Katsiadaki, Ioanna
Kille, Peter
Liu, Li
Lord, Peter G.
McIntyre, Terry
O’Neill, Anne
Osachoff, Heather
Perkins, Ed J.
Santos, Eduarda M.
Skirrow, Rachel C.
Snape, Jason R.
Tyler, Charles R.
Versteeg, Don
Viant, Mark R.
Volz, David C.
Williams, Tim D.
Yu, Lorraine
author_sort Van Aggelen, Graham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics—Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21–23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada). OBJECTIVES: The consortium from government agencies, academia, and industry addressed three topics: progress in ecotoxicogenomics, regulatory perspectives on roadblocks for practical implementation of toxicogenomics into risk assessment, and dealing with variability in data sets. DISCUSSION: Participants noted that examples of successful application of omic technologies have been identified, but critical studies are needed to relate molecular changes to ecological adverse outcome. Participants made recommendations for the management of technical and biological variation. They also stressed the need for enhanced interdisciplinary training and communication as well as considerable investment into the generation and curation of appropriate reference omic data. CONCLUSIONS: The participants concluded that, although there are hurdles to pass on the road to regulatory acceptance, omics technologies are already useful for elucidating modes of action of toxicants and can contribute to the risk assessment process as part of a weight-of-evidence approach.
format Text
id pubmed-2831950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28319502010-03-16 Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook Van Aggelen, Graham Ankley, Gerald T. Baldwin, William S. Bearden, Daniel W. Benson, William H. Chipman, J. Kevin Collette, Tim W. Craft, John A. Denslow, Nancy D. Embry, Michael R. Falciani, Francesco George, Stephen G. Helbing, Caren C. Hoekstra, Paul F. Iguchi, Taisen Kagami, Yoshi Katsiadaki, Ioanna Kille, Peter Liu, Li Lord, Peter G. McIntyre, Terry O’Neill, Anne Osachoff, Heather Perkins, Ed J. Santos, Eduarda M. Skirrow, Rachel C. Snape, Jason R. Tyler, Charles R. Versteeg, Don Viant, Mark R. Volz, David C. Williams, Tim D. Yu, Lorraine Environ Health Perspect Commentary BACKGROUND: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics—Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21–23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada). OBJECTIVES: The consortium from government agencies, academia, and industry addressed three topics: progress in ecotoxicogenomics, regulatory perspectives on roadblocks for practical implementation of toxicogenomics into risk assessment, and dealing with variability in data sets. DISCUSSION: Participants noted that examples of successful application of omic technologies have been identified, but critical studies are needed to relate molecular changes to ecological adverse outcome. Participants made recommendations for the management of technical and biological variation. They also stressed the need for enhanced interdisciplinary training and communication as well as considerable investment into the generation and curation of appropriate reference omic data. CONCLUSIONS: The participants concluded that, although there are hurdles to pass on the road to regulatory acceptance, omics technologies are already useful for elucidating modes of action of toxicants and can contribute to the risk assessment process as part of a weight-of-evidence approach. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2010-01 2009-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2831950/ /pubmed/20056575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900985 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Commentary
Van Aggelen, Graham
Ankley, Gerald T.
Baldwin, William S.
Bearden, Daniel W.
Benson, William H.
Chipman, J. Kevin
Collette, Tim W.
Craft, John A.
Denslow, Nancy D.
Embry, Michael R.
Falciani, Francesco
George, Stephen G.
Helbing, Caren C.
Hoekstra, Paul F.
Iguchi, Taisen
Kagami, Yoshi
Katsiadaki, Ioanna
Kille, Peter
Liu, Li
Lord, Peter G.
McIntyre, Terry
O’Neill, Anne
Osachoff, Heather
Perkins, Ed J.
Santos, Eduarda M.
Skirrow, Rachel C.
Snape, Jason R.
Tyler, Charles R.
Versteeg, Don
Viant, Mark R.
Volz, David C.
Williams, Tim D.
Yu, Lorraine
Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook
title Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook
title_full Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook
title_fullStr Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook
title_short Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook
title_sort integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: hurdles, achievements, and future outlook
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20056575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900985
work_keys_str_mv AT vanaggelengraham integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT ankleygeraldt integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT baldwinwilliams integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT beardendanielw integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT bensonwilliamh integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT chipmanjkevin integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT collettetimw integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT craftjohna integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT denslownancyd integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT embrymichaelr integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT falcianifrancesco integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT georgestepheng integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT helbingcarenc integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT hoekstrapaulf integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT iguchitaisen integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT kagamiyoshi integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT katsiadakiioanna integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT killepeter integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT liuli integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT lordpeterg integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT mcintyreterry integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT oneillanne integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT osachoffheather integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT perkinsedj integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT santoseduardam integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT skirrowrachelc integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT snapejasonr integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT tylercharlesr integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT versteegdon integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT viantmarkr integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT volzdavidc integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT williamstimd integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook
AT yulorraine integratingomictechnologiesintoaquaticecologicalriskassessmentandenvironmentalmonitoringhurdlesachievementsandfutureoutlook