Cargando…

Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension

Although angiotensin receptor blockers have different receptor binding properties no comparative studies with cardiovascular disease (CVD) end points have been performed within this class of drugs. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there are blood pressure independent CVD-risk di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kjeldsen, S E, Stålhammar, J, Hasvold, P, Bodegard, J, Olsson, U, Russell, D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19890371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.77
_version_ 1782178567182876672
author Kjeldsen, S E
Stålhammar, J
Hasvold, P
Bodegard, J
Olsson, U
Russell, D
author_facet Kjeldsen, S E
Stålhammar, J
Hasvold, P
Bodegard, J
Olsson, U
Russell, D
author_sort Kjeldsen, S E
collection PubMed
description Although angiotensin receptor blockers have different receptor binding properties no comparative studies with cardiovascular disease (CVD) end points have been performed within this class of drugs. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there are blood pressure independent CVD-risk differences between losartan and candesartan treatment in patients with hypertension without known CVD. Seventy-two primary care centres in Sweden were screened for patients who had been prescribed losartan or candesartan between the years 1999 and 2007. Among the 24 943 eligible patients, 14 100 patients were diagnosed with hypertension and prescribed losartan (n=6771) or candesartan (n=7329). Patients were linked to Swedish national hospitalizations and death cause register. There was no difference in blood pressure reduction when comparing the losartan and candesartan groups during follow-up. Compared with the losartan group, the candesartan group had a lower adjusted hazard ratio for total CVD (0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77–0.96, P=0.0062), heart failure (0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82, P=0.0004), cardiac arrhythmias (0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.92, P=0.0330), and peripheral artery disease (0.61, 95% CI 0.41–0.91, P=0.0140). No difference in blood pressure reduction was observed suggesting that other mechanisms related to different pharmacological properties of the drugs may explain the divergent clinical outcomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2834374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28343742010-03-29 Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension Kjeldsen, S E Stålhammar, J Hasvold, P Bodegard, J Olsson, U Russell, D J Hum Hypertens Original Article Although angiotensin receptor blockers have different receptor binding properties no comparative studies with cardiovascular disease (CVD) end points have been performed within this class of drugs. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there are blood pressure independent CVD-risk differences between losartan and candesartan treatment in patients with hypertension without known CVD. Seventy-two primary care centres in Sweden were screened for patients who had been prescribed losartan or candesartan between the years 1999 and 2007. Among the 24 943 eligible patients, 14 100 patients were diagnosed with hypertension and prescribed losartan (n=6771) or candesartan (n=7329). Patients were linked to Swedish national hospitalizations and death cause register. There was no difference in blood pressure reduction when comparing the losartan and candesartan groups during follow-up. Compared with the losartan group, the candesartan group had a lower adjusted hazard ratio for total CVD (0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77–0.96, P=0.0062), heart failure (0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.82, P=0.0004), cardiac arrhythmias (0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.92, P=0.0330), and peripheral artery disease (0.61, 95% CI 0.41–0.91, P=0.0140). No difference in blood pressure reduction was observed suggesting that other mechanisms related to different pharmacological properties of the drugs may explain the divergent clinical outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2010-04 2009-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2834374/ /pubmed/19890371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.77 Text en Copyright © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Kjeldsen, S E
Stålhammar, J
Hasvold, P
Bodegard, J
Olsson, U
Russell, D
Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
title Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
title_full Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
title_fullStr Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
title_short Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
title_sort effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19890371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.77
work_keys_str_mv AT kjeldsense effectsoflosartanvscandesartaninreducingcardiovasculareventsintheprimarytreatmentofhypertension
AT stalhammarj effectsoflosartanvscandesartaninreducingcardiovasculareventsintheprimarytreatmentofhypertension
AT hasvoldp effectsoflosartanvscandesartaninreducingcardiovasculareventsintheprimarytreatmentofhypertension
AT bodegardj effectsoflosartanvscandesartaninreducingcardiovasculareventsintheprimarytreatmentofhypertension
AT olssonu effectsoflosartanvscandesartaninreducingcardiovasculareventsintheprimarytreatmentofhypertension
AT russelld effectsoflosartanvscandesartaninreducingcardiovasculareventsintheprimarytreatmentofhypertension