Cargando…
Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators
BACKGROUND: Access to antiretroviral therapy has dramatically expanded in Africa in recent years, but there are no validated approaches to measure treatment adherence in these settings. METHODS: In 16 health facilities, we observed a retrospective cohort of patients initiating antiretroviral therapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20170478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-42 |
_version_ | 1782178575092285440 |
---|---|
author | Ross-Degnan, Dennis Pierre-Jacques, Marsha Zhang, Fang Tadeg, Hailu Gitau, Lillian Ntaganira, Joseph Balikuddembe, Robert Chalker, John Wagner, Anita K |
author_facet | Ross-Degnan, Dennis Pierre-Jacques, Marsha Zhang, Fang Tadeg, Hailu Gitau, Lillian Ntaganira, Joseph Balikuddembe, Robert Chalker, John Wagner, Anita K |
author_sort | Ross-Degnan, Dennis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Access to antiretroviral therapy has dramatically expanded in Africa in recent years, but there are no validated approaches to measure treatment adherence in these settings. METHODS: In 16 health facilities, we observed a retrospective cohort of patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. We constructed eight indicators of adherence and visit attendance during the first 18 months of treatment from data in clinic and pharmacy records and attendance logs. We measured the correlation among these measures and assessed how well each predicted changes in weight and CD4 count. RESULTS: We followed 488 patients; 63.5% had 100% coverage of medicines during follow-up; 2.7% experienced a 30-day gap in treatment; 72.6% self-reported perfect adherence in all clinic visits; and 19.9% missed multiple clinic visits. After six months of treatment, mean weight gain was 3.9 kg and mean increase in CD4 count was 138.1 cells/mm3. Dispensing-based adherence, self-reported adherence, and consistent visit attendance were highly correlated. The first two types of adherence measure predicted gains in weight and CD4 count; consistent visit attendance was associated only with weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that routine data in African health facilities can be used to monitor antiretroviral adherence at the patient and system level. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2834585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28345852010-03-09 Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators Ross-Degnan, Dennis Pierre-Jacques, Marsha Zhang, Fang Tadeg, Hailu Gitau, Lillian Ntaganira, Joseph Balikuddembe, Robert Chalker, John Wagner, Anita K BMC Health Serv Res Research article BACKGROUND: Access to antiretroviral therapy has dramatically expanded in Africa in recent years, but there are no validated approaches to measure treatment adherence in these settings. METHODS: In 16 health facilities, we observed a retrospective cohort of patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. We constructed eight indicators of adherence and visit attendance during the first 18 months of treatment from data in clinic and pharmacy records and attendance logs. We measured the correlation among these measures and assessed how well each predicted changes in weight and CD4 count. RESULTS: We followed 488 patients; 63.5% had 100% coverage of medicines during follow-up; 2.7% experienced a 30-day gap in treatment; 72.6% self-reported perfect adherence in all clinic visits; and 19.9% missed multiple clinic visits. After six months of treatment, mean weight gain was 3.9 kg and mean increase in CD4 count was 138.1 cells/mm3. Dispensing-based adherence, self-reported adherence, and consistent visit attendance were highly correlated. The first two types of adherence measure predicted gains in weight and CD4 count; consistent visit attendance was associated only with weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that routine data in African health facilities can be used to monitor antiretroviral adherence at the patient and system level. BioMed Central 2010-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2834585/ /pubmed/20170478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-42 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ross-Degnan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Ross-Degnan, Dennis Pierre-Jacques, Marsha Zhang, Fang Tadeg, Hailu Gitau, Lillian Ntaganira, Joseph Balikuddembe, Robert Chalker, John Wagner, Anita K Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators |
title | Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators |
title_full | Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators |
title_fullStr | Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators |
title_short | Measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: The clinical validity of key indicators |
title_sort | measuring adherence to antiretroviral treatment in resource-poor settings: the clinical validity of key indicators |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20170478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-42 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossdegnandennis measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT pierrejacquesmarsha measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT zhangfang measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT tadeghailu measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT gitaulillian measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT ntaganirajoseph measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT balikuddemberobert measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT chalkerjohn measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT wagneranitak measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators AT measuringadherencetoantiretroviraltreatmentinresourcepoorsettingstheclinicalvalidityofkeyindicators |