Cargando…

Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA

Metabolomics data obtained from (human) nutritional intervention studies can have a rather complex structure that depends on the underlying experimental design. In this paper we discuss the complex structure in data caused by a cross-over designed experiment. In such a design, each subject in the st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westerhuis, Johan A., van Velzen, Ewoud J. J., Hoefsloot, Huub C. J., Smilde, Age K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20339442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-009-0185-z
_version_ 1782178612315684864
author Westerhuis, Johan A.
van Velzen, Ewoud J. J.
Hoefsloot, Huub C. J.
Smilde, Age K.
author_facet Westerhuis, Johan A.
van Velzen, Ewoud J. J.
Hoefsloot, Huub C. J.
Smilde, Age K.
author_sort Westerhuis, Johan A.
collection PubMed
description Metabolomics data obtained from (human) nutritional intervention studies can have a rather complex structure that depends on the underlying experimental design. In this paper we discuss the complex structure in data caused by a cross-over designed experiment. In such a design, each subject in the study population acts as his or her own control and makes the data paired. For a single univariate response a paired t-test or repeated measures ANOVA can be used to test the differences between the paired observations. The same principle holds for multivariate data. In the current paper we compare a method that exploits the paired data structure in cross-over multivariate data (multilevel PLSDA) with a method that is often used by default but that ignores the paired structure (OPLSDA). The results from both methods have been evaluated in a small simulated example as well as in a genuine data set from a cross-over designed nutritional metabolomics study. It is shown that exploiting the paired data structure underlying the cross-over design considerably improves the power and the interpretability of the multivariate solution. Furthermore, the multilevel approach provides complementary information about (I) the diversity and abundance of the treatment effects within the different (subsets of) subjects across the study population, and (II) the intrinsic differences between these study subjects.
format Text
id pubmed-2834771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28347712010-03-24 Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA Westerhuis, Johan A. van Velzen, Ewoud J. J. Hoefsloot, Huub C. J. Smilde, Age K. Metabolomics Original Article Metabolomics data obtained from (human) nutritional intervention studies can have a rather complex structure that depends on the underlying experimental design. In this paper we discuss the complex structure in data caused by a cross-over designed experiment. In such a design, each subject in the study population acts as his or her own control and makes the data paired. For a single univariate response a paired t-test or repeated measures ANOVA can be used to test the differences between the paired observations. The same principle holds for multivariate data. In the current paper we compare a method that exploits the paired data structure in cross-over multivariate data (multilevel PLSDA) with a method that is often used by default but that ignores the paired structure (OPLSDA). The results from both methods have been evaluated in a small simulated example as well as in a genuine data set from a cross-over designed nutritional metabolomics study. It is shown that exploiting the paired data structure underlying the cross-over design considerably improves the power and the interpretability of the multivariate solution. Furthermore, the multilevel approach provides complementary information about (I) the diversity and abundance of the treatment effects within the different (subsets of) subjects across the study population, and (II) the intrinsic differences between these study subjects. Springer US 2009-10-28 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2834771/ /pubmed/20339442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-009-0185-z Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Westerhuis, Johan A.
van Velzen, Ewoud J. J.
Hoefsloot, Huub C. J.
Smilde, Age K.
Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA
title Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA
title_full Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA
title_fullStr Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA
title_short Multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel PLSDA versus OPLSDA
title_sort multivariate paired data analysis: multilevel plsda versus oplsda
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20339442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-009-0185-z
work_keys_str_mv AT westerhuisjohana multivariatepaireddataanalysismultilevelplsdaversusoplsda
AT vanvelzenewoudjj multivariatepaireddataanalysismultilevelplsdaversusoplsda
AT hoefsloothuubcj multivariatepaireddataanalysismultilevelplsdaversusoplsda
AT smildeagek multivariatepaireddataanalysismultilevelplsdaversusoplsda