Cargando…

Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have not shown mortality benefit from any individual class of medication. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through November 2009 for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryerson, Christopher J, Nayar, Shalini, Swiston, John R, Sin, Don D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-12
_version_ 1782178641834147840
author Ryerson, Christopher J
Nayar, Shalini
Swiston, John R
Sin, Don D
author_facet Ryerson, Christopher J
Nayar, Shalini
Swiston, John R
Sin, Don D
author_sort Ryerson, Christopher J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have not shown mortality benefit from any individual class of medication. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through November 2009 for randomized trials that evaluated any pharmacotherapy in the treatment of PAH. Reference lists from included articles and recent review articles were also searched. Analysis included randomized placebo controlled trials of at least eight weeks duration and studies comparing intravenous medication to an unblinded control group. RESULTS: 1541 unique studies were identified and twenty-four articles with 3758 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were reviewed and data extracted regarding study characteristics and outcomes. Data was pooled for three classes of medication: prostanoids, endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs), and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for mortality, 6-minute walk distance, dyspnea scores, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse effects. Mortality in the control arms was a combined 4.2% over the mean study length of 14.9 weeks. There was significant mortality benefit with prostanoid treatment (RR 0.49, CI 0.29 to 0.82), particularly comparing intravenous agents to control (RR 0.30, CI 0.14 to 0.63). Mortality benefit was not observed for ERAs (RR 0.58, CI 0.21 to 1.60) or PDE5 inhibitors (RR 0.30, CI 0.08 to 1.08). All three classes of medication improved other clinical and hemodynamic endpoints. Adverse effects that were increased in treatment arms include jaw pain, diarrhea, peripheral edema, headache, and nausea in prostanoids; and visual disturbance, dyspepsia, flushing, headache, and limb pain in PDE5 inhibitors. No adverse events were significantly associated with ERA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PAH with prostanoids reduces mortality and improves multiple other clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. ERAs and PDE5 inhibitors improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, but have no proven effect on mortality. The long-term effects of all PAH treatment requires further study.
format Text
id pubmed-2835653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28356532010-03-10 Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ryerson, Christopher J Nayar, Shalini Swiston, John R Sin, Don D Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have not shown mortality benefit from any individual class of medication. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through November 2009 for randomized trials that evaluated any pharmacotherapy in the treatment of PAH. Reference lists from included articles and recent review articles were also searched. Analysis included randomized placebo controlled trials of at least eight weeks duration and studies comparing intravenous medication to an unblinded control group. RESULTS: 1541 unique studies were identified and twenty-four articles with 3758 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were reviewed and data extracted regarding study characteristics and outcomes. Data was pooled for three classes of medication: prostanoids, endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs), and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for mortality, 6-minute walk distance, dyspnea scores, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse effects. Mortality in the control arms was a combined 4.2% over the mean study length of 14.9 weeks. There was significant mortality benefit with prostanoid treatment (RR 0.49, CI 0.29 to 0.82), particularly comparing intravenous agents to control (RR 0.30, CI 0.14 to 0.63). Mortality benefit was not observed for ERAs (RR 0.58, CI 0.21 to 1.60) or PDE5 inhibitors (RR 0.30, CI 0.08 to 1.08). All three classes of medication improved other clinical and hemodynamic endpoints. Adverse effects that were increased in treatment arms include jaw pain, diarrhea, peripheral edema, headache, and nausea in prostanoids; and visual disturbance, dyspepsia, flushing, headache, and limb pain in PDE5 inhibitors. No adverse events were significantly associated with ERA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PAH with prostanoids reduces mortality and improves multiple other clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. ERAs and PDE5 inhibitors improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes, but have no proven effect on mortality. The long-term effects of all PAH treatment requires further study. BioMed Central 2010 2010-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2835653/ /pubmed/20113497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-12 Text en Copyright ©2010 Ryerson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ryerson, Christopher J
Nayar, Shalini
Swiston, John R
Sin, Don D
Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort pharmacotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-11-12
work_keys_str_mv AT ryersonchristopherj pharmacotherapyinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nayarshalini pharmacotherapyinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT swistonjohnr pharmacotherapyinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sindond pharmacotherapyinpulmonaryarterialhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis