Cargando…

Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection

BACKGROUND: Divergence of two independently evolving sequences that originated from a common ancestor can be described by two parameters, the asymptotic level of divergence E and the rate r at which this level of divergence is approached. Constant negative selection impedes allele replacements and,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kondrashov, Alexey S, Povolotskaya, Inna S, Ivankov, Dmitry N, Kondrashov, Fyodor A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20092641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-5
_version_ 1782178644233289728
author Kondrashov, Alexey S
Povolotskaya, Inna S
Ivankov, Dmitry N
Kondrashov, Fyodor A
author_facet Kondrashov, Alexey S
Povolotskaya, Inna S
Ivankov, Dmitry N
Kondrashov, Fyodor A
author_sort Kondrashov, Alexey S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Divergence of two independently evolving sequences that originated from a common ancestor can be described by two parameters, the asymptotic level of divergence E and the rate r at which this level of divergence is approached. Constant negative selection impedes allele replacements and, therefore, is routinely assumed to decelerate sequence divergence. However, its impact on E and on r has not been formally investigated. RESULTS: Strong selection that favors only one allele can make E arbitrarily small and r arbitrarily large. In contrast, in the case of 4 possible alleles and equal mutation rates, the lowest value of r, attained when two alleles confer equal fitnesses and the other two are strongly deleterious, is only two times lower than its value under selective neutrality. CONCLUSIONS: Constant selection can strongly constrain the level of sequence divergence, but cannot reduce substantially the rate at which this level is approached. In particular, under any constant selection the divergence of sequences that accumulated one substitution per neutral site since their origin from the common ancestor must already constitute at least one half of the asymptotic divergence at sites under such selection. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Drs. Nicolas Galtier, Sergei Maslov, and Nick Grishin.
format Text
id pubmed-2835663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28356632010-03-10 Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection Kondrashov, Alexey S Povolotskaya, Inna S Ivankov, Dmitry N Kondrashov, Fyodor A Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: Divergence of two independently evolving sequences that originated from a common ancestor can be described by two parameters, the asymptotic level of divergence E and the rate r at which this level of divergence is approached. Constant negative selection impedes allele replacements and, therefore, is routinely assumed to decelerate sequence divergence. However, its impact on E and on r has not been formally investigated. RESULTS: Strong selection that favors only one allele can make E arbitrarily small and r arbitrarily large. In contrast, in the case of 4 possible alleles and equal mutation rates, the lowest value of r, attained when two alleles confer equal fitnesses and the other two are strongly deleterious, is only two times lower than its value under selective neutrality. CONCLUSIONS: Constant selection can strongly constrain the level of sequence divergence, but cannot reduce substantially the rate at which this level is approached. In particular, under any constant selection the divergence of sequences that accumulated one substitution per neutral site since their origin from the common ancestor must already constitute at least one half of the asymptotic divergence at sites under such selection. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Drs. Nicolas Galtier, Sergei Maslov, and Nick Grishin. BioMed Central 2010-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2835663/ /pubmed/20092641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-5 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kondrashov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kondrashov, Alexey S
Povolotskaya, Inna S
Ivankov, Dmitry N
Kondrashov, Fyodor A
Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
title Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
title_full Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
title_fullStr Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
title_full_unstemmed Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
title_short Rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
title_sort rate of sequence divergence under constant selection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20092641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kondrashovalexeys rateofsequencedivergenceunderconstantselection
AT povolotskayainnas rateofsequencedivergenceunderconstantselection
AT ivankovdmitryn rateofsequencedivergenceunderconstantselection
AT kondrashovfyodora rateofsequencedivergenceunderconstantselection