Cargando…

A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning

BACKGROUND: The only available diagnostic method for East African trypanosomiasis is light microscopy of blood samples. A simple immunodiagnostic would greatly aid trypanosomiasis control. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To find trypanosome proteins that are specifically recognised by sera from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manful, Theresa, Mulindwa, Julius, Frank, Fernanda M., Clayton, Christine E., Matovu, Enock
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20224787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009630
_version_ 1782178664909111296
author Manful, Theresa
Mulindwa, Julius
Frank, Fernanda M.
Clayton, Christine E.
Matovu, Enock
author_facet Manful, Theresa
Mulindwa, Julius
Frank, Fernanda M.
Clayton, Christine E.
Matovu, Enock
author_sort Manful, Theresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The only available diagnostic method for East African trypanosomiasis is light microscopy of blood samples. A simple immunodiagnostic would greatly aid trypanosomiasis control. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To find trypanosome proteins that are specifically recognised by sera from human sleeping sickness patients, we have screened the Trypanosoma brucei brucei proteome by Western blotting. Using cytosolic, cytoskeletal and glycosomal fractions, we found that the vast majority of abundant trypanosome proteins is not specifically recognised by patient sera. We identified phosphoglycerate kinase (PGKC), heat shock protein (HSP70), and histones H2B and H3 as possible candidate diagnostic antigens. These proteins, plus paraflagellar rod protein 1, rhodesain (a cysteine protease), and an extracellular fragment of the Trypanosoma brucei nucleoside transporter TbNT10, were expressed in E. coli and tested for reactivity with patient and control sera. Only TbHSP70 was preferentially recognized by patient sera, but the sensitivity and specificity were insufficient for use of TbHSP70 alone as a diagnostic. Immunoprecipitation using a native protein extract revealed no specifically reacting proteins. CONCLUSIONS: No abundant T. brucei soluble, glycosomal or cytoskeletal protein is likely to be useful in diagnosis. To find useful diagnostic antigens it will therefore be necessary to use more sophisticated proteomic methods, or to test a very large panel of candidate proteins.
format Text
id pubmed-2835760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28357602010-03-12 A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning Manful, Theresa Mulindwa, Julius Frank, Fernanda M. Clayton, Christine E. Matovu, Enock PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The only available diagnostic method for East African trypanosomiasis is light microscopy of blood samples. A simple immunodiagnostic would greatly aid trypanosomiasis control. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To find trypanosome proteins that are specifically recognised by sera from human sleeping sickness patients, we have screened the Trypanosoma brucei brucei proteome by Western blotting. Using cytosolic, cytoskeletal and glycosomal fractions, we found that the vast majority of abundant trypanosome proteins is not specifically recognised by patient sera. We identified phosphoglycerate kinase (PGKC), heat shock protein (HSP70), and histones H2B and H3 as possible candidate diagnostic antigens. These proteins, plus paraflagellar rod protein 1, rhodesain (a cysteine protease), and an extracellular fragment of the Trypanosoma brucei nucleoside transporter TbNT10, were expressed in E. coli and tested for reactivity with patient and control sera. Only TbHSP70 was preferentially recognized by patient sera, but the sensitivity and specificity were insufficient for use of TbHSP70 alone as a diagnostic. Immunoprecipitation using a native protein extract revealed no specifically reacting proteins. CONCLUSIONS: No abundant T. brucei soluble, glycosomal or cytoskeletal protein is likely to be useful in diagnosis. To find useful diagnostic antigens it will therefore be necessary to use more sophisticated proteomic methods, or to test a very large panel of candidate proteins. Public Library of Science 2010-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2835760/ /pubmed/20224787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009630 Text en Manful et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manful, Theresa
Mulindwa, Julius
Frank, Fernanda M.
Clayton, Christine E.
Matovu, Enock
A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning
title A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning
title_full A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning
title_fullStr A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning
title_full_unstemmed A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning
title_short A Search for Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense Diagnostic Antigens by Proteomic Screening and Targeted Cloning
title_sort search for trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense diagnostic antigens by proteomic screening and targeted cloning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2835760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20224787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009630
work_keys_str_mv AT manfultheresa asearchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT mulindwajulius asearchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT frankfernandam asearchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT claytonchristinee asearchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT matovuenock asearchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT manfultheresa searchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT mulindwajulius searchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT frankfernandam searchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT claytonchristinee searchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning
AT matovuenock searchfortrypanosomabruceirhodesiensediagnosticantigensbyproteomicscreeningandtargetedcloning