Cargando…

Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey

BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleckenstein, Johannes, Zaps, Daniela, Rüger, Linda J, Lehmeyer, Lukas, Freiberg, Florentina, Lang, Philip M, Irnich, Dominik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-32
_version_ 1782178699917918208
author Fleckenstein, Johannes
Zaps, Daniela
Rüger, Linda J
Lehmeyer, Lukas
Freiberg, Florentina
Lang, Philip M
Irnich, Dominik
author_facet Fleckenstein, Johannes
Zaps, Daniela
Rüger, Linda J
Lehmeyer, Lukas
Freiberg, Florentina
Lang, Philip M
Irnich, Dominik
author_sort Fleckenstein, Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment options in their management of myofascial pain. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire among 332 physicians (79.8% male, 25.6% female, 47.5 ± 9.6 years) experienced in treating patients with myofascial pain. Recruitment of physicians took place at three German meetings of pain therapists, rheumatologists and orthopaedists, respectively. Physicians estimated the prevalence of myofascial pain amongst patients in their practices, stated what treatments they used routinely and then rated the perceived treatment effectiveness on a six-point scale (with 1 being excellent). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The estimated overall prevalence of active myofascial trigger points is 46.1 ± 27.4%. Frequently prescribed treatments are analgesics, mainly metamizol/paracetamol (91.6%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/coxibs (87.0%) or weak opioids (81.8%), and physical therapies, mainly manual therapy (81.1%), TENS (72.9%) or acupuncture (60.2%). Overall effectiveness ratings for analgesics (2.9 ± 0.7) and physical therapies were moderate (2.5 ± 0.8). Effectiveness ratings of the various treatment options between specialities were widely variant. 54.3% of all physicians characterized the available treatment options as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Myofascial pain was estimated a prevalent condition. Despite a variety of commonly prescribed treatments, the moderate effectiveness ratings and the frequent characterizations of the available treatments as insufficient suggest an urgent need for clinical research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome.
format Text
id pubmed-2836281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28362812010-03-11 Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey Fleckenstein, Johannes Zaps, Daniela Rüger, Linda J Lehmeyer, Lukas Freiberg, Florentina Lang, Philip M Irnich, Dominik BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research article BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment options in their management of myofascial pain. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire among 332 physicians (79.8% male, 25.6% female, 47.5 ± 9.6 years) experienced in treating patients with myofascial pain. Recruitment of physicians took place at three German meetings of pain therapists, rheumatologists and orthopaedists, respectively. Physicians estimated the prevalence of myofascial pain amongst patients in their practices, stated what treatments they used routinely and then rated the perceived treatment effectiveness on a six-point scale (with 1 being excellent). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The estimated overall prevalence of active myofascial trigger points is 46.1 ± 27.4%. Frequently prescribed treatments are analgesics, mainly metamizol/paracetamol (91.6%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/coxibs (87.0%) or weak opioids (81.8%), and physical therapies, mainly manual therapy (81.1%), TENS (72.9%) or acupuncture (60.2%). Overall effectiveness ratings for analgesics (2.9 ± 0.7) and physical therapies were moderate (2.5 ± 0.8). Effectiveness ratings of the various treatment options between specialities were widely variant. 54.3% of all physicians characterized the available treatment options as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Myofascial pain was estimated a prevalent condition. Despite a variety of commonly prescribed treatments, the moderate effectiveness ratings and the frequent characterizations of the available treatments as insufficient suggest an urgent need for clinical research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. BioMed Central 2010-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2836281/ /pubmed/20149248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-32 Text en Copyright ©2010 Fleckenstein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Fleckenstein, Johannes
Zaps, Daniela
Rüger, Linda J
Lehmeyer, Lukas
Freiberg, Florentina
Lang, Philip M
Irnich, Dominik
Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
title Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
title_full Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
title_fullStr Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
title_short Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
title_sort discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-32
work_keys_str_mv AT fleckensteinjohannes discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT zapsdaniela discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT rugerlindaj discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT lehmeyerlukas discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT freibergflorentina discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT langphilipm discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey
AT irnichdominik discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey