Cargando…
Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-32 |
_version_ | 1782178699917918208 |
---|---|
author | Fleckenstein, Johannes Zaps, Daniela Rüger, Linda J Lehmeyer, Lukas Freiberg, Florentina Lang, Philip M Irnich, Dominik |
author_facet | Fleckenstein, Johannes Zaps, Daniela Rüger, Linda J Lehmeyer, Lukas Freiberg, Florentina Lang, Philip M Irnich, Dominik |
author_sort | Fleckenstein, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment options in their management of myofascial pain. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire among 332 physicians (79.8% male, 25.6% female, 47.5 ± 9.6 years) experienced in treating patients with myofascial pain. Recruitment of physicians took place at three German meetings of pain therapists, rheumatologists and orthopaedists, respectively. Physicians estimated the prevalence of myofascial pain amongst patients in their practices, stated what treatments they used routinely and then rated the perceived treatment effectiveness on a six-point scale (with 1 being excellent). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The estimated overall prevalence of active myofascial trigger points is 46.1 ± 27.4%. Frequently prescribed treatments are analgesics, mainly metamizol/paracetamol (91.6%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/coxibs (87.0%) or weak opioids (81.8%), and physical therapies, mainly manual therapy (81.1%), TENS (72.9%) or acupuncture (60.2%). Overall effectiveness ratings for analgesics (2.9 ± 0.7) and physical therapies were moderate (2.5 ± 0.8). Effectiveness ratings of the various treatment options between specialities were widely variant. 54.3% of all physicians characterized the available treatment options as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Myofascial pain was estimated a prevalent condition. Despite a variety of commonly prescribed treatments, the moderate effectiveness ratings and the frequent characterizations of the available treatments as insufficient suggest an urgent need for clinical research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2836281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28362812010-03-11 Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey Fleckenstein, Johannes Zaps, Daniela Rüger, Linda J Lehmeyer, Lukas Freiberg, Florentina Lang, Philip M Irnich, Dominik BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research article BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment options in their management of myofascial pain. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire among 332 physicians (79.8% male, 25.6% female, 47.5 ± 9.6 years) experienced in treating patients with myofascial pain. Recruitment of physicians took place at three German meetings of pain therapists, rheumatologists and orthopaedists, respectively. Physicians estimated the prevalence of myofascial pain amongst patients in their practices, stated what treatments they used routinely and then rated the perceived treatment effectiveness on a six-point scale (with 1 being excellent). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The estimated overall prevalence of active myofascial trigger points is 46.1 ± 27.4%. Frequently prescribed treatments are analgesics, mainly metamizol/paracetamol (91.6%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/coxibs (87.0%) or weak opioids (81.8%), and physical therapies, mainly manual therapy (81.1%), TENS (72.9%) or acupuncture (60.2%). Overall effectiveness ratings for analgesics (2.9 ± 0.7) and physical therapies were moderate (2.5 ± 0.8). Effectiveness ratings of the various treatment options between specialities were widely variant. 54.3% of all physicians characterized the available treatment options as insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Myofascial pain was estimated a prevalent condition. Despite a variety of commonly prescribed treatments, the moderate effectiveness ratings and the frequent characterizations of the available treatments as insufficient suggest an urgent need for clinical research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. BioMed Central 2010-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2836281/ /pubmed/20149248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-32 Text en Copyright ©2010 Fleckenstein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Fleckenstein, Johannes Zaps, Daniela Rüger, Linda J Lehmeyer, Lukas Freiberg, Florentina Lang, Philip M Irnich, Dominik Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title | Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_full | Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_fullStr | Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_short | Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
title_sort | discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fleckensteinjohannes discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT zapsdaniela discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT rugerlindaj discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT lehmeyerlukas discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT freibergflorentina discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT langphilipm discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey AT irnichdominik discrepancybetweenprevalenceandperceivedeffectivenessoftreatmentmethodsinmyofascialpainsyndromeresultsofacrosssectionalnationwidesurvey |