Cargando…

The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial

BACKGROUND: There is a sound rationale for the population-based approach to falls injury prevention but there is currently insufficient evidence to advise governments and communities on how they can use population-based strategies to achieve desired reductions in the burden of falls-related injury....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McClure, Rod J, Hughes, Karen, Ren, Cizao, McKenzie, Kirsten, Dietrich, Uta, Vardon, Paul, Davis, Elizabeth, Newman, Beth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20167124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-79
_version_ 1782178753552580608
author McClure, Rod J
Hughes, Karen
Ren, Cizao
McKenzie, Kirsten
Dietrich, Uta
Vardon, Paul
Davis, Elizabeth
Newman, Beth
author_facet McClure, Rod J
Hughes, Karen
Ren, Cizao
McKenzie, Kirsten
Dietrich, Uta
Vardon, Paul
Davis, Elizabeth
Newman, Beth
author_sort McClure, Rod J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a sound rationale for the population-based approach to falls injury prevention but there is currently insufficient evidence to advise governments and communities on how they can use population-based strategies to achieve desired reductions in the burden of falls-related injury. The aim of the study was to quantify the effectiveness of a streamlined (and thus potentially sustainable and cost-effective), population-based, multi-factorial falls injury prevention program for people over 60 years of age. METHODS: Population-based falls-prevention interventions were conducted at two geographically-defined and separate Australian sites: Wide Bay, Queensland, and Northern Rivers, NSW. Changes in the prevalence of key risk factors and changes in rates of injury outcomes within each community were compared before and after program implementation and changes in rates of injury outcomes in each community were also compared with the rates in their respective States. RESULTS: The interventions in neither community substantially decreased the rate of falls-related injury among people aged 60 years or older, although there was some evidence of reductions in occurrence of multiple falls reported by women. In addition, there was some indication of improvements in fall-related risk factors, but the magnitudes were generally modest. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that low intensity population-based falls prevention programs may not be as effective as those that are intensively implemented.
format Text
id pubmed-2836986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28369862010-03-12 The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial McClure, Rod J Hughes, Karen Ren, Cizao McKenzie, Kirsten Dietrich, Uta Vardon, Paul Davis, Elizabeth Newman, Beth BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: There is a sound rationale for the population-based approach to falls injury prevention but there is currently insufficient evidence to advise governments and communities on how they can use population-based strategies to achieve desired reductions in the burden of falls-related injury. The aim of the study was to quantify the effectiveness of a streamlined (and thus potentially sustainable and cost-effective), population-based, multi-factorial falls injury prevention program for people over 60 years of age. METHODS: Population-based falls-prevention interventions were conducted at two geographically-defined and separate Australian sites: Wide Bay, Queensland, and Northern Rivers, NSW. Changes in the prevalence of key risk factors and changes in rates of injury outcomes within each community were compared before and after program implementation and changes in rates of injury outcomes in each community were also compared with the rates in their respective States. RESULTS: The interventions in neither community substantially decreased the rate of falls-related injury among people aged 60 years or older, although there was some evidence of reductions in occurrence of multiple falls reported by women. In addition, there was some indication of improvements in fall-related risk factors, but the magnitudes were generally modest. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that low intensity population-based falls prevention programs may not be as effective as those that are intensively implemented. BioMed Central 2010-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2836986/ /pubmed/20167124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-79 Text en Copyright ©2010 McClure et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
McClure, Rod J
Hughes, Karen
Ren, Cizao
McKenzie, Kirsten
Dietrich, Uta
Vardon, Paul
Davis, Elizabeth
Newman, Beth
The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
title The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
title_full The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
title_fullStr The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
title_full_unstemmed The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
title_short The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
title_sort population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20167124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-79
work_keys_str_mv AT mcclurerodj thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT hugheskaren thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT rencizao thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT mckenziekirsten thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT dietrichuta thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT vardonpaul thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT daviselizabeth thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT newmanbeth thepopulationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT mcclurerodj populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT hugheskaren populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT rencizao populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT mckenziekirsten populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT dietrichuta populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT vardonpaul populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT daviselizabeth populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial
AT newmanbeth populationapproachtofallsinjurypreventioninolderpeoplefindingsofatwocommunitytrial