Cargando…
Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) therapies can have negative effects on bone. Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk. A retrospective, case–controlle...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605548 |
_version_ | 1782178825174515712 |
---|---|
author | Hadji, P Ziller, M Albert, U S Kalder, M |
author_facet | Hadji, P Ziller, M Albert, U S Kalder, M |
author_sort | Hadji, P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) therapies can have negative effects on bone. Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk. A retrospective, case–controlled study based on current and emerging guidelines was conducted in women with newly diagnosed BC to identify those who were at increased fracture risk based on current and emerging guidelines. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, fracture risk factors, and lumbar–spine (LS) and total-hip BMD in women with BC (88 premenopausal and 402 postmenopausal) were assessed to determine who would receive bisphosphonate therapy based on current and emerging guidelines. RESULTS: Among patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER(+)) BC, 18.8% of premenopausal and 36.9% of postmenopausal women were osteopenic at LS. In the postmenopausal cohort, osteoporosis was more prevalent in patients with ER(+) vs ER(–) BC. Current guidelines identified 8.9% of patients as eligible for antiresorptive therapy, clinical risk factors alone identified 6.5%, and BMD plus clinical risk factors identified 28.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to fracture risk factors present at BC diagnosis, cancer therapies leading to BMD loss further increase fracture risk. Evaluating both BMD and clinical risk factors may allow more effective identification of BC patients with elevated fracture risk. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2837568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28375682011-02-16 Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines Hadji, P Ziller, M Albert, U S Kalder, M Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) therapies can have negative effects on bone. Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk. A retrospective, case–controlled study based on current and emerging guidelines was conducted in women with newly diagnosed BC to identify those who were at increased fracture risk based on current and emerging guidelines. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, fracture risk factors, and lumbar–spine (LS) and total-hip BMD in women with BC (88 premenopausal and 402 postmenopausal) were assessed to determine who would receive bisphosphonate therapy based on current and emerging guidelines. RESULTS: Among patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER(+)) BC, 18.8% of premenopausal and 36.9% of postmenopausal women were osteopenic at LS. In the postmenopausal cohort, osteoporosis was more prevalent in patients with ER(+) vs ER(–) BC. Current guidelines identified 8.9% of patients as eligible for antiresorptive therapy, clinical risk factors alone identified 6.5%, and BMD plus clinical risk factors identified 28.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to fracture risk factors present at BC diagnosis, cancer therapies leading to BMD loss further increase fracture risk. Evaluating both BMD and clinical risk factors may allow more effective identification of BC patients with elevated fracture risk. Nature Publishing Group 2010-02-16 2010-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2837568/ /pubmed/20087347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605548 Text en Copyright © 2010 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Hadji, P Ziller, M Albert, U S Kalder, M Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
title | Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
title_full | Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
title_fullStr | Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
title_short | Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
title_sort | assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadjip assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines AT zillerm assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines AT albertus assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines AT kalderm assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines |