Cargando…

Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) therapies can have negative effects on bone. Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk. A retrospective, case–controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadji, P, Ziller, M, Albert, U S, Kalder, M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605548
_version_ 1782178825174515712
author Hadji, P
Ziller, M
Albert, U S
Kalder, M
author_facet Hadji, P
Ziller, M
Albert, U S
Kalder, M
author_sort Hadji, P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) therapies can have negative effects on bone. Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk. A retrospective, case–controlled study based on current and emerging guidelines was conducted in women with newly diagnosed BC to identify those who were at increased fracture risk based on current and emerging guidelines. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, fracture risk factors, and lumbar–spine (LS) and total-hip BMD in women with BC (88 premenopausal and 402 postmenopausal) were assessed to determine who would receive bisphosphonate therapy based on current and emerging guidelines. RESULTS: Among patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER(+)) BC, 18.8% of premenopausal and 36.9% of postmenopausal women were osteopenic at LS. In the postmenopausal cohort, osteoporosis was more prevalent in patients with ER(+) vs ER(–) BC. Current guidelines identified 8.9% of patients as eligible for antiresorptive therapy, clinical risk factors alone identified 6.5%, and BMD plus clinical risk factors identified 28.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to fracture risk factors present at BC diagnosis, cancer therapies leading to BMD loss further increase fracture risk. Evaluating both BMD and clinical risk factors may allow more effective identification of BC patients with elevated fracture risk.
format Text
id pubmed-2837568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28375682011-02-16 Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines Hadji, P Ziller, M Albert, U S Kalder, M Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) therapies can have negative effects on bone. Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk. A retrospective, case–controlled study based on current and emerging guidelines was conducted in women with newly diagnosed BC to identify those who were at increased fracture risk based on current and emerging guidelines. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, fracture risk factors, and lumbar–spine (LS) and total-hip BMD in women with BC (88 premenopausal and 402 postmenopausal) were assessed to determine who would receive bisphosphonate therapy based on current and emerging guidelines. RESULTS: Among patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER(+)) BC, 18.8% of premenopausal and 36.9% of postmenopausal women were osteopenic at LS. In the postmenopausal cohort, osteoporosis was more prevalent in patients with ER(+) vs ER(–) BC. Current guidelines identified 8.9% of patients as eligible for antiresorptive therapy, clinical risk factors alone identified 6.5%, and BMD plus clinical risk factors identified 28.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to fracture risk factors present at BC diagnosis, cancer therapies leading to BMD loss further increase fracture risk. Evaluating both BMD and clinical risk factors may allow more effective identification of BC patients with elevated fracture risk. Nature Publishing Group 2010-02-16 2010-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2837568/ /pubmed/20087347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605548 Text en Copyright © 2010 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hadji, P
Ziller, M
Albert, U S
Kalder, M
Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
title Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
title_full Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
title_fullStr Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
title_short Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
title_sort assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605548
work_keys_str_mv AT hadjip assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines
AT zillerm assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines
AT albertus assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines
AT kalderm assessmentoffractureriskinwomenwithbreastcancerusingcurrentvsemergingguidelines