Cargando…

Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast

BACKGROUND: Proteins do not act in isolation; they frequently act together in protein complexes to carry out concerted cellular functions. The evolution of complexes is poorly understood, especially in organisms other than yeast, where little experimental data has been available. RESULTS: We generat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reid, Adam J, Ranea, Juan AG, Orengo, Christine A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-79
_version_ 1782178837063270400
author Reid, Adam J
Ranea, Juan AG
Orengo, Christine A
author_facet Reid, Adam J
Ranea, Juan AG
Orengo, Christine A
author_sort Reid, Adam J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proteins do not act in isolation; they frequently act together in protein complexes to carry out concerted cellular functions. The evolution of complexes is poorly understood, especially in organisms other than yeast, where little experimental data has been available. RESULTS: We generated accurate, high coverage datasets of protein complexes for E. coli and yeast in order to study differences in the evolution of complexes between these two species. We show that substantial differences exist in how complexes have evolved between these organisms. A previously proposed model of complex evolution identified complexes with cores of interacting homologues. We support findings of the relative importance of this mode of evolution in yeast, but find that it is much less common in E. coli. Additionally it is shown that those homologues which do cluster in complexes are involved in eukaryote-specific functions. Furthermore we identify correlated pairs of non-homologous domains which occur in multiple protein complexes. These were identified in both yeast and E. coli and we present evidence that these too may represent complex cores in yeast but not those of E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there are differences in the way protein complexes have evolved in E. coli and yeast. Whereas some yeast complexes have evolved by recruiting paralogues, this is not apparent in E. coli. Furthermore, such complexes are involved in eukaryotic-specific functions. This implies that the increase in gene family sizes seen in eukaryotes in part reflects multiple family members being used within complexes. However, in general, in both E. coli and yeast, homologous domains are used in different complexes.
format Text
id pubmed-2837643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28376432010-03-13 Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast Reid, Adam J Ranea, Juan AG Orengo, Christine A BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Proteins do not act in isolation; they frequently act together in protein complexes to carry out concerted cellular functions. The evolution of complexes is poorly understood, especially in organisms other than yeast, where little experimental data has been available. RESULTS: We generated accurate, high coverage datasets of protein complexes for E. coli and yeast in order to study differences in the evolution of complexes between these two species. We show that substantial differences exist in how complexes have evolved between these organisms. A previously proposed model of complex evolution identified complexes with cores of interacting homologues. We support findings of the relative importance of this mode of evolution in yeast, but find that it is much less common in E. coli. Additionally it is shown that those homologues which do cluster in complexes are involved in eukaryote-specific functions. Furthermore we identify correlated pairs of non-homologous domains which occur in multiple protein complexes. These were identified in both yeast and E. coli and we present evidence that these too may represent complex cores in yeast but not those of E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there are differences in the way protein complexes have evolved in E. coli and yeast. Whereas some yeast complexes have evolved by recruiting paralogues, this is not apparent in E. coli. Furthermore, such complexes are involved in eukaryotic-specific functions. This implies that the increase in gene family sizes seen in eukaryotes in part reflects multiple family members being used within complexes. However, in general, in both E. coli and yeast, homologous domains are used in different complexes. BioMed Central 2010-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2837643/ /pubmed/20122144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-79 Text en Copyright ©2010 Reid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reid, Adam J
Ranea, Juan AG
Orengo, Christine A
Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast
title Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast
title_full Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast
title_fullStr Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast
title_short Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast
title_sort comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in e. coli and yeast
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-79
work_keys_str_mv AT reidadamj comparativeevolutionaryanalysisofproteincomplexesinecoliandyeast
AT raneajuanag comparativeevolutionaryanalysisofproteincomplexesinecoliandyeast
AT orengochristinea comparativeevolutionaryanalysisofproteincomplexesinecoliandyeast