Cargando…
A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability
BACKGROUND: As the amount of data from genome wide association studies grows dramatically, many interesting scientific questions require imputation to combine or expand datasets. However, there are two situations for which imputation has been problematic: (1) polymorphisms with low minor allele freq...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009697 |
_version_ | 1782178848106872832 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Peng Hartz, Sarah M. Zhang, Zhehao Saccone, Scott F. Wang, Jia Tischfield, Jay A. Edenberg, Howard J. Kramer, John R. M.Goate, Alison Bierut, Laura J. Rice, John P. |
author_facet | Lin, Peng Hartz, Sarah M. Zhang, Zhehao Saccone, Scott F. Wang, Jia Tischfield, Jay A. Edenberg, Howard J. Kramer, John R. M.Goate, Alison Bierut, Laura J. Rice, John P. |
author_sort | Lin, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the amount of data from genome wide association studies grows dramatically, many interesting scientific questions require imputation to combine or expand datasets. However, there are two situations for which imputation has been problematic: (1) polymorphisms with low minor allele frequency (MAF), and (2) datasets where subjects are genotyped on different platforms. Traditional measures of imputation cannot effectively address these problems. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We introduce a new statistic, the imputation quality score (IQS). In order to differentiate between well-imputed and poorly-imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), IQS adjusts the concordance between imputed and genotyped SNPs for chance. We first evaluated IQS in relation to minor allele frequency. Using a sample of subjects genotyped on the Illumina 1 M array, we extracted those SNPs that were also on the Illumina 550 K array and imputed them to the full set of the 1 M SNPs. As expected, the average IQS value drops dramatically with a decrease in minor allele frequency, indicating that IQS appropriately adjusts for minor allele frequency. We then evaluated whether IQS can filter poorly-imputed SNPs in situations where cases and controls are genotyped on different platforms. Randomly dividing the data into “cases” and “controls”, we extracted the Illumina 550 K SNPs from the cases and imputed the remaining Illumina 1 M SNPs. The initial Q-Q plot for the test of association between cases and controls was grossly distorted (λ = 1.15) and had 4016 false positives, reflecting imputation error. After filtering out SNPs with IQS<0.9, the Q-Q plot was acceptable and there were no longer false positives. We then evaluated the robustness of IQS computed independently on the two halves of the data. In both European Americans and African Americans the correlation was >0.99 demonstrating that a database of IQS values from common imputations could be used as an effective filter to combine data genotyped on different platforms. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IQS effectively differentiates well-imputed and poorly-imputed SNPs. It is particularly useful for SNPs with low minor allele frequency and when datasets are genotyped on different platforms. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2837741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28377412010-03-18 A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability Lin, Peng Hartz, Sarah M. Zhang, Zhehao Saccone, Scott F. Wang, Jia Tischfield, Jay A. Edenberg, Howard J. Kramer, John R. M.Goate, Alison Bierut, Laura J. Rice, John P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: As the amount of data from genome wide association studies grows dramatically, many interesting scientific questions require imputation to combine or expand datasets. However, there are two situations for which imputation has been problematic: (1) polymorphisms with low minor allele frequency (MAF), and (2) datasets where subjects are genotyped on different platforms. Traditional measures of imputation cannot effectively address these problems. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We introduce a new statistic, the imputation quality score (IQS). In order to differentiate between well-imputed and poorly-imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), IQS adjusts the concordance between imputed and genotyped SNPs for chance. We first evaluated IQS in relation to minor allele frequency. Using a sample of subjects genotyped on the Illumina 1 M array, we extracted those SNPs that were also on the Illumina 550 K array and imputed them to the full set of the 1 M SNPs. As expected, the average IQS value drops dramatically with a decrease in minor allele frequency, indicating that IQS appropriately adjusts for minor allele frequency. We then evaluated whether IQS can filter poorly-imputed SNPs in situations where cases and controls are genotyped on different platforms. Randomly dividing the data into “cases” and “controls”, we extracted the Illumina 550 K SNPs from the cases and imputed the remaining Illumina 1 M SNPs. The initial Q-Q plot for the test of association between cases and controls was grossly distorted (λ = 1.15) and had 4016 false positives, reflecting imputation error. After filtering out SNPs with IQS<0.9, the Q-Q plot was acceptable and there were no longer false positives. We then evaluated the robustness of IQS computed independently on the two halves of the data. In both European Americans and African Americans the correlation was >0.99 demonstrating that a database of IQS values from common imputations could be used as an effective filter to combine data genotyped on different platforms. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IQS effectively differentiates well-imputed and poorly-imputed SNPs. It is particularly useful for SNPs with low minor allele frequency and when datasets are genotyped on different platforms. Public Library of Science 2010-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2837741/ /pubmed/20300623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009697 Text en Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lin, Peng Hartz, Sarah M. Zhang, Zhehao Saccone, Scott F. Wang, Jia Tischfield, Jay A. Edenberg, Howard J. Kramer, John R. M.Goate, Alison Bierut, Laura J. Rice, John P. A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability |
title | A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability |
title_full | A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability |
title_fullStr | A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability |
title_short | A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability |
title_sort | new statistic to evaluate imputation reliability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linpeng anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT hartzsarahm anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT zhangzhehao anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT sacconescottf anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT wangjia anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT tischfieldjaya anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT edenberghowardj anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT kramerjohnr anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT mgoatealison anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT bierutlauraj anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT ricejohnp anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT anewstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT linpeng newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT hartzsarahm newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT zhangzhehao newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT sacconescottf newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT wangjia newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT tischfieldjaya newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT edenberghowardj newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT kramerjohnr newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT mgoatealison newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT bierutlauraj newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT ricejohnp newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability AT newstatistictoevaluateimputationreliability |