Cargando…

Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach

BACKGROUND: Template-target sequence alignment and loop modeling are key components of protein comparative modeling. Short loops can be predicted with high accuracy using structural fragments from other, not necessairly homologous proteins, or by various minimization methods. For longer loops multis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamroz, Michal, Kolinski, Andrzej
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-10-5
_version_ 1782178859117969408
author Jamroz, Michal
Kolinski, Andrzej
author_facet Jamroz, Michal
Kolinski, Andrzej
author_sort Jamroz, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Template-target sequence alignment and loop modeling are key components of protein comparative modeling. Short loops can be predicted with high accuracy using structural fragments from other, not necessairly homologous proteins, or by various minimization methods. For longer loops multiscale approaches employing coarse-grained de novo modeling techniques should be more effective. RESULTS: For a representative set of protein structures of various structural classes test predictions of loop regions have been performed using MODELLER, ROSETTA, and a CABS coarse-grained de novo modeling tool. Loops of various length, from 4 to 25 residues, were modeled assuming an ideal target-template alignment of the remaining portions of the protein. It has been shown that classical modeling with MODELLER is usually better for short loops, while coarse-grained de novo modeling is more effective for longer loops. Even very long missing fragments in protein structures could be effectively modeled. Resolution of such models is usually on the level 2-6 Å, which could be sufficient for guiding protein engineering. Further improvement of modeling accuracy could be achieved by the combination of different methods. In particular, we used 10 top ranked models from sets of 500 models generated by MODELLER as multiple templates for CABS modeling. On average, the resulting molecular models were better than the models from individual methods. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy of protein modeling, as demonstrated for the problem of loop modeling, could be improved by the combinations of different modeling techniques.
format Text
id pubmed-2837870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28378702010-03-14 Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach Jamroz, Michal Kolinski, Andrzej BMC Struct Biol Research article BACKGROUND: Template-target sequence alignment and loop modeling are key components of protein comparative modeling. Short loops can be predicted with high accuracy using structural fragments from other, not necessairly homologous proteins, or by various minimization methods. For longer loops multiscale approaches employing coarse-grained de novo modeling techniques should be more effective. RESULTS: For a representative set of protein structures of various structural classes test predictions of loop regions have been performed using MODELLER, ROSETTA, and a CABS coarse-grained de novo modeling tool. Loops of various length, from 4 to 25 residues, were modeled assuming an ideal target-template alignment of the remaining portions of the protein. It has been shown that classical modeling with MODELLER is usually better for short loops, while coarse-grained de novo modeling is more effective for longer loops. Even very long missing fragments in protein structures could be effectively modeled. Resolution of such models is usually on the level 2-6 Å, which could be sufficient for guiding protein engineering. Further improvement of modeling accuracy could be achieved by the combination of different methods. In particular, we used 10 top ranked models from sets of 500 models generated by MODELLER as multiple templates for CABS modeling. On average, the resulting molecular models were better than the models from individual methods. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy of protein modeling, as demonstrated for the problem of loop modeling, could be improved by the combinations of different modeling techniques. BioMed Central 2010-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2837870/ /pubmed/20149252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-10-5 Text en Copyright ©2010 Jamroz and Kolinski; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Jamroz, Michal
Kolinski, Andrzej
Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
title Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
title_full Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
title_fullStr Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
title_full_unstemmed Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
title_short Modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
title_sort modeling of loops in proteins: a multi-method approach
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-10-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jamrozmichal modelingofloopsinproteinsamultimethodapproach
AT kolinskiandrzej modelingofloopsinproteinsamultimethodapproach