Cargando…

The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle

BACKGROUND: The impact of additive-genetic relationships captured by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) has been demonstrated, but recent studies on data obtained from Holstein populations have ignored this fact. However, this impact and the acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habier, David, Tetens, Jens, Seefried, Franz-Reinhold, Lichtner, Peter, Thaller, Georg
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2838754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20170500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-5
_version_ 1782178880192249856
author Habier, David
Tetens, Jens
Seefried, Franz-Reinhold
Lichtner, Peter
Thaller, Georg
author_facet Habier, David
Tetens, Jens
Seefried, Franz-Reinhold
Lichtner, Peter
Thaller, Georg
author_sort Habier, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of additive-genetic relationships captured by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) has been demonstrated, but recent studies on data obtained from Holstein populations have ignored this fact. However, this impact and the accuracy of GEBVs due to linkage disequilibrium (LD), which is fairly persistent over generations, must be known to implement future breeding programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data set used to investigate these questions consisted of 3,863 German Holstein bulls genotyped for 54,001 SNPs, their pedigree and daughter yield deviations for milk yield, fat yield, protein yield and somatic cell score. A cross-validation methodology was applied, where the maximum additive-genetic relationship (a(max)) between bulls in training and validation was controlled. GEBVs were estimated by a Bayesian model averaging approach (BayesB) and an animal model using the genomic relationship matrix (G-BLUP). The accuracy of GEBVs due to LD was estimated by a regression approach using accuracy of GEBVs and accuracy of pedigree-based BLUP-EBVs. RESULTS: Accuracy of GEBVs obtained by both BayesB and G-BLUP decreased with decreasing a(max )for all traits analyzed. The decay of accuracy tended to be larger for G-BLUP and with smaller training size. Differences between BayesB and G-BLUP became evident for the accuracy due to LD, where BayesB clearly outperformed G-BLUP with increasing training size. CONCLUSIONS: GEBV accuracy of current selection candidates varies due to different additive-genetic relationships relative to the training data. Accuracy of future candidates can be lower than reported in previous studies because information from close relatives will not be available when selection on GEBVs is applied. A Bayesian model averaging approach exploits LD information considerably better than G-BLUP and thus is the most promising method. Cross-validations should account for family structure in the data to allow for long-lasting genomic based breeding plans in animal and plant breeding.
format Text
id pubmed-2838754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28387542010-03-16 The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle Habier, David Tetens, Jens Seefried, Franz-Reinhold Lichtner, Peter Thaller, Georg Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: The impact of additive-genetic relationships captured by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) has been demonstrated, but recent studies on data obtained from Holstein populations have ignored this fact. However, this impact and the accuracy of GEBVs due to linkage disequilibrium (LD), which is fairly persistent over generations, must be known to implement future breeding programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data set used to investigate these questions consisted of 3,863 German Holstein bulls genotyped for 54,001 SNPs, their pedigree and daughter yield deviations for milk yield, fat yield, protein yield and somatic cell score. A cross-validation methodology was applied, where the maximum additive-genetic relationship (a(max)) between bulls in training and validation was controlled. GEBVs were estimated by a Bayesian model averaging approach (BayesB) and an animal model using the genomic relationship matrix (G-BLUP). The accuracy of GEBVs due to LD was estimated by a regression approach using accuracy of GEBVs and accuracy of pedigree-based BLUP-EBVs. RESULTS: Accuracy of GEBVs obtained by both BayesB and G-BLUP decreased with decreasing a(max )for all traits analyzed. The decay of accuracy tended to be larger for G-BLUP and with smaller training size. Differences between BayesB and G-BLUP became evident for the accuracy due to LD, where BayesB clearly outperformed G-BLUP with increasing training size. CONCLUSIONS: GEBV accuracy of current selection candidates varies due to different additive-genetic relationships relative to the training data. Accuracy of future candidates can be lower than reported in previous studies because information from close relatives will not be available when selection on GEBVs is applied. A Bayesian model averaging approach exploits LD information considerably better than G-BLUP and thus is the most promising method. Cross-validations should account for family structure in the data to allow for long-lasting genomic based breeding plans in animal and plant breeding. BioMed Central 2010-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2838754/ /pubmed/20170500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-5 Text en Copyright ©2010 Habier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Habier, David
Tetens, Jens
Seefried, Franz-Reinhold
Lichtner, Peter
Thaller, Georg
The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
title The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
title_full The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
title_fullStr The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
title_full_unstemmed The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
title_short The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
title_sort impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in german holstein cattle
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2838754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20170500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-5
work_keys_str_mv AT habierdavid theimpactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT tetensjens theimpactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT seefriedfranzreinhold theimpactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT lichtnerpeter theimpactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT thallergeorg theimpactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT habierdavid impactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT tetensjens impactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT seefriedfranzreinhold impactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT lichtnerpeter impactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle
AT thallergeorg impactofgeneticrelationshipinformationongenomicbreedingvaluesingermanholsteincattle