Cargando…
Plasma pharmacokinetics after combined therapy of gemcitabine and oral S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer
BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative, has been shown to be a promising regimen for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Six patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this pharmacokinetics (PK) study. Thes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2838818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-15 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative, has been shown to be a promising regimen for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Six patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this pharmacokinetics (PK) study. These patients were treated by oral administration of S-1 30 mg/m(2 )twice daily for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day rest period and intravenous administration of GEM 800 mg/m(2 )on days 1, 15 and 29 of each course. The PK parameters of GEM and/or 5-FU after GEM single-administration, S-1 single-administration, and co-administration of GEM with pre-administration of S-1 at 2-h intervals were analyzed. RESULTS: The maximum concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve from the drug administration to the infinite time (AUCinf), and the elimination half-life (T1/2) of GEM were not significantly different between GEM administration with and without S-1. The Cmax, AUCinf, T1/2, and the time required to reach Cmax (Tmax) were not significantly different between S-1 administration with and without GEM. CONCLUSION: There were no interactions between GEM and S-1 regarding plasma PK of GEM and 5-FU. |
---|