Cargando…

Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee

Task allocation patterns should depend on the spatial distribution of work within the nest, variation in task demand, and the movement patterns of workers, however, relatively little research has focused on these topics. This study uses a spatially explicit agent based model to determine whether suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Johnson, B. R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2839491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0077-2
_version_ 1782178952382513152
author Johnson, B. R.
author_facet Johnson, B. R.
author_sort Johnson, B. R.
collection PubMed
description Task allocation patterns should depend on the spatial distribution of work within the nest, variation in task demand, and the movement patterns of workers, however, relatively little research has focused on these topics. This study uses a spatially explicit agent based model to determine whether such factors alone can generate biases in task performance at the individual level in the honey bees, Apis mellifera. Specialization (bias in task performance) is shown to result from strong sampling error due to localized task demand, relatively slow moving workers relative to nest size, and strong spatial variation in task demand. To date, specialization has been primarily interpreted with the response threshold concept, which is focused on intrinsic (typically genotypic) differences between workers. Response threshold variation and sampling error due to spatial effects are not mutually exclusive, however, and this study suggests that both contribute to patterns of task bias at the individual level. While spatial effects are strong enough to explain some documented cases of specialization; they are relatively short term and not explanatory for long term cases of specialization. In general, this study suggests that the spatial layout of tasks and fluctuations in their demand must be explicitly controlled for in studies focused on identifying genotypic specialists.
format Text
id pubmed-2839491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28394912010-03-26 Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee Johnson, B. R. Insectes Soc Research Article Task allocation patterns should depend on the spatial distribution of work within the nest, variation in task demand, and the movement patterns of workers, however, relatively little research has focused on these topics. This study uses a spatially explicit agent based model to determine whether such factors alone can generate biases in task performance at the individual level in the honey bees, Apis mellifera. Specialization (bias in task performance) is shown to result from strong sampling error due to localized task demand, relatively slow moving workers relative to nest size, and strong spatial variation in task demand. To date, specialization has been primarily interpreted with the response threshold concept, which is focused on intrinsic (typically genotypic) differences between workers. Response threshold variation and sampling error due to spatial effects are not mutually exclusive, however, and this study suggests that both contribute to patterns of task bias at the individual level. While spatial effects are strong enough to explain some documented cases of specialization; they are relatively short term and not explanatory for long term cases of specialization. In general, this study suggests that the spatial layout of tasks and fluctuations in their demand must be explicitly controlled for in studies focused on identifying genotypic specialists. SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 2010-02-24 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2839491/ /pubmed/20351761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0077-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, B. R.
Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
title Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
title_full Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
title_fullStr Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
title_full_unstemmed Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
title_short Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
title_sort spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2839491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0077-2
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonbr spatialeffectssamplingerrorsandtaskspecializationinthehoneybee