Cargando…
Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells
Dendritic cells (DC) represent a heterogeneous cell family of major importance for innate immune responses against pathogens and antigen presentation during infection, cancer, allergy and autoimmunity. The aim of the present study was to characterize canine DC generated in vitro with respect to thei...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2839791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20167201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres/2010012 |
_version_ | 1782178961936089088 |
---|---|
author | Ricklin Gutzwiller, Meret Elisabeth Moulin, Hervé Raphaël Zurbriggen, Andreas Roosje, Petra Summerfield, Artur |
author_facet | Ricklin Gutzwiller, Meret Elisabeth Moulin, Hervé Raphaël Zurbriggen, Andreas Roosje, Petra Summerfield, Artur |
author_sort | Ricklin Gutzwiller, Meret Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dendritic cells (DC) represent a heterogeneous cell family of major importance for innate immune responses against pathogens and antigen presentation during infection, cancer, allergy and autoimmunity. The aim of the present study was to characterize canine DC generated in vitro with respect to their phenotype, responsiveness to toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and T-cell stimulatory capacity. DC were derived from monocytes (MoDC) and from bone marrow hematopoietic cells cultured with either Flt3-ligand (FL-BMDC) or with GM-CSF (GM-BMDC). All three methods generated cells with typical DC morphology that expressed CD1c, CD11c and CD14, similar to macrophages. However, CD40 was only found on DC, CD206 on MΦ and BMDC, but not on monocytes and MoDC. CD1c was not found on monocytes but on all in vitro differentiated cells. FL-BMDC and GM-BMDC were partially positive for CD4 and CD8. CD45RA was expressed on a subset of FL-BMDC but not on MoDC and GM-BMDC. MoDC and FL-DC responded well to TLR ligands including poly-IC (TLR2), Pam3Cys (TLR3), LPS (TLR4) and imiquimod (TLR7) by up-regulating MHC II and CD86. The generated DC and MΦ showed a stimulatory capacity for lymphocytes, which increased upon maturation with LPS. Taken together, our results are the basis for further characterization of canine DC subsets with respect to their role in inflammation and immune responses. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2839791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28397912011-07-01 Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells Ricklin Gutzwiller, Meret Elisabeth Moulin, Hervé Raphaël Zurbriggen, Andreas Roosje, Petra Summerfield, Artur Vet Res Original Article Dendritic cells (DC) represent a heterogeneous cell family of major importance for innate immune responses against pathogens and antigen presentation during infection, cancer, allergy and autoimmunity. The aim of the present study was to characterize canine DC generated in vitro with respect to their phenotype, responsiveness to toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and T-cell stimulatory capacity. DC were derived from monocytes (MoDC) and from bone marrow hematopoietic cells cultured with either Flt3-ligand (FL-BMDC) or with GM-CSF (GM-BMDC). All three methods generated cells with typical DC morphology that expressed CD1c, CD11c and CD14, similar to macrophages. However, CD40 was only found on DC, CD206 on MΦ and BMDC, but not on monocytes and MoDC. CD1c was not found on monocytes but on all in vitro differentiated cells. FL-BMDC and GM-BMDC were partially positive for CD4 and CD8. CD45RA was expressed on a subset of FL-BMDC but not on MoDC and GM-BMDC. MoDC and FL-DC responded well to TLR ligands including poly-IC (TLR2), Pam3Cys (TLR3), LPS (TLR4) and imiquimod (TLR7) by up-regulating MHC II and CD86. The generated DC and MΦ showed a stimulatory capacity for lymphocytes, which increased upon maturation with LPS. Taken together, our results are the basis for further characterization of canine DC subsets with respect to their role in inflammation and immune responses. EDP Sciences 2010-02-22 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2839791/ /pubmed/20167201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres/2010012 Text en © INRA, EDP Sciences, 2010 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ricklin Gutzwiller, Meret Elisabeth Moulin, Hervé Raphaël Zurbriggen, Andreas Roosje, Petra Summerfield, Artur Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
title | Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
title_full | Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
title_short | Comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
title_sort | comparative analysis of canine monocyte- and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2839791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20167201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres/2010012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricklingutzwillermeretelisabeth comparativeanalysisofcaninemonocyteandbonemarrowderiveddendriticcells AT moulinherveraphael comparativeanalysisofcaninemonocyteandbonemarrowderiveddendriticcells AT zurbriggenandreas comparativeanalysisofcaninemonocyteandbonemarrowderiveddendriticcells AT roosjepetra comparativeanalysisofcaninemonocyteandbonemarrowderiveddendriticcells AT summerfieldartur comparativeanalysisofcaninemonocyteandbonemarrowderiveddendriticcells |