Cargando…
An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300307 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.41407 |
_version_ | 1782179031064510464 |
---|---|
author | Amadi, Hippolite O. Banerjee, Sughran Hansen, Ulrich N. Wallace, Andrew L. Bull, Anthony M. J. |
author_facet | Amadi, Hippolite O. Banerjee, Sughran Hansen, Ulrich N. Wallace, Andrew L. Bull, Anthony M. J. |
author_sort | Amadi, Hippolite O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination. Six glenoid and eight scapular axes were defined and quantified from identifiable landmarks of twenty-one scapular image scans. Pathology independency and insensitivity of each axis to inter-subject morphological variation within its region was tested. Glenoid version and inclination were calculated using the best axes from the two regions. The best glenoid axis was the normal to a least-square plane fit on the glenoid rim, directed approximately medio-laterally. The best scapular axis was the normal to a plane formed by the spine root and lateral border ridge. Glenoid inclination was 15.7° ± 5.1° superiorly and version was 4.9° ± 6.1°, retroversion. The choice of axes in the present technique makes it insensitive to pathology and scapular morphological variabilities. Its application would effectively improve inter-subject glenoid version comparison, surgical planning and design of prostheses for shoulder arthroplasty. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2840818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28408182010-03-18 An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation Amadi, Hippolite O. Banerjee, Sughran Hansen, Ulrich N. Wallace, Andrew L. Bull, Anthony M. J. Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination. Six glenoid and eight scapular axes were defined and quantified from identifiable landmarks of twenty-one scapular image scans. Pathology independency and insensitivity of each axis to inter-subject morphological variation within its region was tested. Glenoid version and inclination were calculated using the best axes from the two regions. The best glenoid axis was the normal to a least-square plane fit on the glenoid rim, directed approximately medio-laterally. The best scapular axis was the normal to a plane formed by the spine root and lateral border ridge. Glenoid inclination was 15.7° ± 5.1° superiorly and version was 4.9° ± 6.1°, retroversion. The choice of axes in the present technique makes it insensitive to pathology and scapular morphological variabilities. Its application would effectively improve inter-subject glenoid version comparison, surgical planning and design of prostheses for shoulder arthroplasty. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2840818/ /pubmed/20300307 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.41407 Text en © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Amadi, Hippolite O. Banerjee, Sughran Hansen, Ulrich N. Wallace, Andrew L. Bull, Anthony M. J. An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
title | An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
title_full | An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
title_fullStr | An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
title_full_unstemmed | An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
title_short | An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
title_sort | optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300307 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.41407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amadihippoliteo anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT banerjeesughran anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT hansenulrichn anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT wallaceandrewl anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT bullanthonymj anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT amadihippoliteo optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT banerjeesughran optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT hansenulrichn optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT wallaceandrewl optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation AT bullanthonymj optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation |