Cargando…

An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation

A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amadi, Hippolite O., Banerjee, Sughran, Hansen, Ulrich N., Wallace, Andrew L., Bull, Anthony M. J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300307
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.41407
_version_ 1782179031064510464
author Amadi, Hippolite O.
Banerjee, Sughran
Hansen, Ulrich N.
Wallace, Andrew L.
Bull, Anthony M. J.
author_facet Amadi, Hippolite O.
Banerjee, Sughran
Hansen, Ulrich N.
Wallace, Andrew L.
Bull, Anthony M. J.
author_sort Amadi, Hippolite O.
collection PubMed
description A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination. Six glenoid and eight scapular axes were defined and quantified from identifiable landmarks of twenty-one scapular image scans. Pathology independency and insensitivity of each axis to inter-subject morphological variation within its region was tested. Glenoid version and inclination were calculated using the best axes from the two regions. The best glenoid axis was the normal to a least-square plane fit on the glenoid rim, directed approximately medio-laterally. The best scapular axis was the normal to a plane formed by the spine root and lateral border ridge. Glenoid inclination was 15.7° ± 5.1° superiorly and version was 4.9° ± 6.1°, retroversion. The choice of axes in the present technique makes it insensitive to pathology and scapular morphological variabilities. Its application would effectively improve inter-subject glenoid version comparison, surgical planning and design of prostheses for shoulder arthroplasty.
format Text
id pubmed-2840818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28408182010-03-18 An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation Amadi, Hippolite O. Banerjee, Sughran Hansen, Ulrich N. Wallace, Andrew L. Bull, Anthony M. J. Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination. Six glenoid and eight scapular axes were defined and quantified from identifiable landmarks of twenty-one scapular image scans. Pathology independency and insensitivity of each axis to inter-subject morphological variation within its region was tested. Glenoid version and inclination were calculated using the best axes from the two regions. The best glenoid axis was the normal to a least-square plane fit on the glenoid rim, directed approximately medio-laterally. The best scapular axis was the normal to a plane formed by the spine root and lateral border ridge. Glenoid inclination was 15.7° ± 5.1° superiorly and version was 4.9° ± 6.1°, retroversion. The choice of axes in the present technique makes it insensitive to pathology and scapular morphological variabilities. Its application would effectively improve inter-subject glenoid version comparison, surgical planning and design of prostheses for shoulder arthroplasty. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2840818/ /pubmed/20300307 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.41407 Text en © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amadi, Hippolite O.
Banerjee, Sughran
Hansen, Ulrich N.
Wallace, Andrew L.
Bull, Anthony M. J.
An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
title An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
title_full An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
title_fullStr An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
title_full_unstemmed An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
title_short An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
title_sort optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300307
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.41407
work_keys_str_mv AT amadihippoliteo anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT banerjeesughran anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT hansenulrichn anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT wallaceandrewl anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT bullanthonymj anoptimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT amadihippoliteo optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT banerjeesughran optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT hansenulrichn optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT wallaceandrewl optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation
AT bullanthonymj optimisedmethodforquantifyingglenoidorientation