Cargando…
A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split
PURPOSE: Traditional teaching suggests that a safe deltoid split should extend no more than 5 cm from the lateral edge of the acromion. However, there are reports of nerves lying within this distance. Our aim was to redefine the safe maximum split and also to study the influence of arm length and po...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.42577 |
_version_ | 1782179031774396416 |
---|---|
author | Abhinav, Gulihar Sivaraman, Balasubramanian Matthew, Nixon Grahame J.S., Taylor |
author_facet | Abhinav, Gulihar Sivaraman, Balasubramanian Matthew, Nixon Grahame J.S., Taylor |
author_sort | Abhinav, Gulihar |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Traditional teaching suggests that a safe deltoid split should extend no more than 5 cm from the lateral edge of the acromion. However, there are reports of nerves lying within this distance. Our aim was to redefine the safe maximum split and also to study the influence of arm length and position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty cadaveric shoulders were dissected using the deltoid-splitting approach and the acromion-axillary nerve distance was measured in the neutral position, in abduction, and in adduction. This was correlated to upper arm length. Deltoid splits were measured at the end of 13 deltoid-splitting shoulder operations. RESULTS: The mean acromion-axillary nerve distance was 6.0 cm (SD 0.6; range 4.5–6.5). Abduction brought the nerve closer by 1.5 cm. There was a strong correlation with upper arm length (r = 0.82) but the presence of high individual variability did not allow calculation of a safe deltoid split. The mean deltoid split in 13 open shoulder operations was 3.4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Taking the mean acromion-axillary nerve distance minus three standard deviations as the safe deltoid split would protect 99.7% of nerves. Therefore we recommend that the maximum deltoid split should be 4.2 cm; this distance would be sufficient to preserve all nerves in our study as well as all those reported by other authors. Splitting the deltoid in abduction should be avoided. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The traditional 5-cm deltoid split is probably too generous. We believe 4.2 cm is a safer limit. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2840821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28408212010-03-18 A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split Abhinav, Gulihar Sivaraman, Balasubramanian Matthew, Nixon Grahame J.S., Taylor Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Traditional teaching suggests that a safe deltoid split should extend no more than 5 cm from the lateral edge of the acromion. However, there are reports of nerves lying within this distance. Our aim was to redefine the safe maximum split and also to study the influence of arm length and position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty cadaveric shoulders were dissected using the deltoid-splitting approach and the acromion-axillary nerve distance was measured in the neutral position, in abduction, and in adduction. This was correlated to upper arm length. Deltoid splits were measured at the end of 13 deltoid-splitting shoulder operations. RESULTS: The mean acromion-axillary nerve distance was 6.0 cm (SD 0.6; range 4.5–6.5). Abduction brought the nerve closer by 1.5 cm. There was a strong correlation with upper arm length (r = 0.82) but the presence of high individual variability did not allow calculation of a safe deltoid split. The mean deltoid split in 13 open shoulder operations was 3.4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Taking the mean acromion-axillary nerve distance minus three standard deviations as the safe deltoid split would protect 99.7% of nerves. Therefore we recommend that the maximum deltoid split should be 4.2 cm; this distance would be sufficient to preserve all nerves in our study as well as all those reported by other authors. Splitting the deltoid in abduction should be avoided. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The traditional 5-cm deltoid split is probably too generous. We believe 4.2 cm is a safer limit. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2840821/ /pubmed/20300314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.42577 Text en © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abhinav, Gulihar Sivaraman, Balasubramanian Matthew, Nixon Grahame J.S., Taylor A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
title | A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
title_full | A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
title_fullStr | A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
title_full_unstemmed | A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
title_short | A contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
title_sort | contribution to the calculation of a safe deltoid split |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2840821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300314 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.42577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abhinavgulihar acontributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT sivaramanbalasubramanian acontributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT matthewnixon acontributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT grahamejstaylor acontributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT abhinavgulihar contributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT sivaramanbalasubramanian contributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT matthewnixon contributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit AT grahamejstaylor contributiontothecalculationofasafedeltoidsplit |