Cargando…

Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health

BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robeson, Paula, Dobbins, Maureen, DeCorby, Kara, Tirilis, Daiva
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95
_version_ 1782179071274254336
author Robeson, Paula
Dobbins, Maureen
DeCorby, Kara
Tirilis, Daiva
author_facet Robeson, Paula
Dobbins, Maureen
DeCorby, Kara
Tirilis, Daiva
author_sort Robeson, Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor and choosing the most synthesized evidence of the highest quality and relevance to the practice issue and setting that is available; and 4) extracting, interpreting, and translating knowledge, in light of the local context and resources, into practice, program and policy decisions. While the public health sector in Canada is working toward evidence-informed decision making, considerable barriers, including efficient access to synthesized resources, exist. METHODS: In this paper we map to a previously developed 6 level pyramid of pre-processed research evidence, relevant resources that include public health-related effectiveness evidence. The resources were identified through extensive searches of both the published and unpublished domains. RESULTS: Many resources with public health-related evidence were identified. While there were very few resources dedicated solely to public health evidence, many clinically focused resources include public health-related evidence, making tools such as the pyramid, that identify these resources, particularly helpful for public health decisions makers. A practical example illustrates the application of this model and highlights its potential to reduce the time and effort that would be required by public health decision makers to address their practice-based issues. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes an existing hierarchy of pre-processed evidence and its adaptation to the public health setting. A number of resources with public health-relevant content that are either freely accessible or requiring a subscription are identified. This will facilitate easier and faster access to pre-processed, public health-relevant evidence, with the intent of promoting evidence-informed decision making. Access to such resources addresses several barriers identified by public health decision makers to evidence-informed decision making, most importantly time, as well as lack of knowledge of resources that house public health-relevant evidence.
format Text
id pubmed-2841107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28411072010-03-18 Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health Robeson, Paula Dobbins, Maureen DeCorby, Kara Tirilis, Daiva BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor and choosing the most synthesized evidence of the highest quality and relevance to the practice issue and setting that is available; and 4) extracting, interpreting, and translating knowledge, in light of the local context and resources, into practice, program and policy decisions. While the public health sector in Canada is working toward evidence-informed decision making, considerable barriers, including efficient access to synthesized resources, exist. METHODS: In this paper we map to a previously developed 6 level pyramid of pre-processed research evidence, relevant resources that include public health-related effectiveness evidence. The resources were identified through extensive searches of both the published and unpublished domains. RESULTS: Many resources with public health-related evidence were identified. While there were very few resources dedicated solely to public health evidence, many clinically focused resources include public health-related evidence, making tools such as the pyramid, that identify these resources, particularly helpful for public health decisions makers. A practical example illustrates the application of this model and highlights its potential to reduce the time and effort that would be required by public health decision makers to address their practice-based issues. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes an existing hierarchy of pre-processed evidence and its adaptation to the public health setting. A number of resources with public health-relevant content that are either freely accessible or requiring a subscription are identified. This will facilitate easier and faster access to pre-processed, public health-relevant evidence, with the intent of promoting evidence-informed decision making. Access to such resources addresses several barriers identified by public health decision makers to evidence-informed decision making, most importantly time, as well as lack of knowledge of resources that house public health-relevant evidence. BioMed Central 2010-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2841107/ /pubmed/20181270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95 Text en Copyright ©2010 Robeson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Robeson, Paula
Dobbins, Maureen
DeCorby, Kara
Tirilis, Daiva
Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
title Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
title_full Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
title_fullStr Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
title_short Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
title_sort facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95
work_keys_str_mv AT robesonpaula facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth
AT dobbinsmaureen facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth
AT decorbykara facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth
AT tirilisdaiva facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth