Cargando…
Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95 |
_version_ | 1782179071274254336 |
---|---|
author | Robeson, Paula Dobbins, Maureen DeCorby, Kara Tirilis, Daiva |
author_facet | Robeson, Paula Dobbins, Maureen DeCorby, Kara Tirilis, Daiva |
author_sort | Robeson, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor and choosing the most synthesized evidence of the highest quality and relevance to the practice issue and setting that is available; and 4) extracting, interpreting, and translating knowledge, in light of the local context and resources, into practice, program and policy decisions. While the public health sector in Canada is working toward evidence-informed decision making, considerable barriers, including efficient access to synthesized resources, exist. METHODS: In this paper we map to a previously developed 6 level pyramid of pre-processed research evidence, relevant resources that include public health-related effectiveness evidence. The resources were identified through extensive searches of both the published and unpublished domains. RESULTS: Many resources with public health-related evidence were identified. While there were very few resources dedicated solely to public health evidence, many clinically focused resources include public health-related evidence, making tools such as the pyramid, that identify these resources, particularly helpful for public health decisions makers. A practical example illustrates the application of this model and highlights its potential to reduce the time and effort that would be required by public health decision makers to address their practice-based issues. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes an existing hierarchy of pre-processed evidence and its adaptation to the public health setting. A number of resources with public health-relevant content that are either freely accessible or requiring a subscription are identified. This will facilitate easier and faster access to pre-processed, public health-relevant evidence, with the intent of promoting evidence-informed decision making. Access to such resources addresses several barriers identified by public health decision makers to evidence-informed decision making, most importantly time, as well as lack of knowledge of resources that house public health-relevant evidence. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2841107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28411072010-03-18 Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health Robeson, Paula Dobbins, Maureen DeCorby, Kara Tirilis, Daiva BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor and choosing the most synthesized evidence of the highest quality and relevance to the practice issue and setting that is available; and 4) extracting, interpreting, and translating knowledge, in light of the local context and resources, into practice, program and policy decisions. While the public health sector in Canada is working toward evidence-informed decision making, considerable barriers, including efficient access to synthesized resources, exist. METHODS: In this paper we map to a previously developed 6 level pyramid of pre-processed research evidence, relevant resources that include public health-related effectiveness evidence. The resources were identified through extensive searches of both the published and unpublished domains. RESULTS: Many resources with public health-related evidence were identified. While there were very few resources dedicated solely to public health evidence, many clinically focused resources include public health-related evidence, making tools such as the pyramid, that identify these resources, particularly helpful for public health decisions makers. A practical example illustrates the application of this model and highlights its potential to reduce the time and effort that would be required by public health decision makers to address their practice-based issues. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes an existing hierarchy of pre-processed evidence and its adaptation to the public health setting. A number of resources with public health-relevant content that are either freely accessible or requiring a subscription are identified. This will facilitate easier and faster access to pre-processed, public health-relevant evidence, with the intent of promoting evidence-informed decision making. Access to such resources addresses several barriers identified by public health decision makers to evidence-informed decision making, most importantly time, as well as lack of knowledge of resources that house public health-relevant evidence. BioMed Central 2010-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2841107/ /pubmed/20181270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95 Text en Copyright ©2010 Robeson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Robeson, Paula Dobbins, Maureen DeCorby, Kara Tirilis, Daiva Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
title | Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
title_full | Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
title_fullStr | Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
title_full_unstemmed | Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
title_short | Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
title_sort | facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-95 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robesonpaula facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth AT dobbinsmaureen facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth AT decorbykara facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth AT tirilisdaiva facilitatingaccesstopreprocessedresearchevidenceinpublichealth |