Cargando…

The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls

BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is an important public health problem. Epidemiological understanding of this problem is incomplete as longitudinal studies in the general population are difficult to undertake. In particular little is known about early life risk factors for later drug injection or abou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macleod, John, Copeland, Lorraine, Hickman, Matthew, McKenzie, James, Kimber, Jo, De Angelis, Daniela, Robertson, James R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20187928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-101
_version_ 1782179151313108992
author Macleod, John
Copeland, Lorraine
Hickman, Matthew
McKenzie, James
Kimber, Jo
De Angelis, Daniela
Robertson, James R
author_facet Macleod, John
Copeland, Lorraine
Hickman, Matthew
McKenzie, James
Kimber, Jo
De Angelis, Daniela
Robertson, James R
author_sort Macleod, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is an important public health problem. Epidemiological understanding of this problem is incomplete as longitudinal studies in the general population are difficult to undertake. In particular little is known about early life risk factors for later drug injection or about the life course of injection once established including the influence of medical and social interventions. METHODS: Individuals thought to be drug injectors were identified through a single primary medical care facility in Edinburgh between 1980 and 2006 and flagged with the General Registry Office. From October 2005 - October 2007, these cases were traced and invited to undergo interview assessment covering early life experience, substance use, health and social histories. Age and sex matched controls for confirmed cases (alive and dead) were later recruited through the same health facility. Controls for living cases completed the same structured interview schedule. Data were also collected on cases and controls through linkage to routine primary care records, death registrations, hospital contact statistics and police and prison records. All interviews were conducted with the knowledge and permission of the current GP. RESULTS: The initial cohort size was 814. At start of follow up 227 had died. Of the remaining 587: 20 had no contact details and 5 had embarked from the UK; 40 declined participation; 38 did not respond to invitations; 14 were excluded by their GP on health or social grounds and 22 had their contact details withheld by administrative authorities. 448 were interviewed of whom 16 denied injection and were excluded. Of 191 dead cases with medical records 4 were excluded as their records contained no evidence of injection. 5 interviewed cases died before follow up was concluded though these individuals were counted as "live" cases. 1 control per case (dead and alive) was recruited. Linkage to Scottish Morbidity Records data (available from 1981 onwards) on general acute inpatient and day cases, mental health inpatient and day cases and cancer was provided by Information Services, NHS Scotland, for all cases interviewed and all dead cases. The Scottish Prison Service provided records for 198 (46%) of cases interviewed, 48 cases not interviewed and 34 (18%) of dead cases. For a sub-sample of 100 interviewees a search of the Lothian and Borders police database was made for official criminal records and 94 had criminal records. Data linkage for controls is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting drug users recruited from a community setting can be successfully followed-up through interviews and record linkage. Information from injecting cases is being analysed in terms of injecting patterns and possible influences on these. Comparisons between cases and controls will allow identification of possibly modifiable early life risk factors for drug injection and will also clarify the burden of disease associated with injection and the influence on this of different health and social interventions.
format Text
id pubmed-2841670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28416702010-03-19 The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls Macleod, John Copeland, Lorraine Hickman, Matthew McKenzie, James Kimber, Jo De Angelis, Daniela Robertson, James R BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is an important public health problem. Epidemiological understanding of this problem is incomplete as longitudinal studies in the general population are difficult to undertake. In particular little is known about early life risk factors for later drug injection or about the life course of injection once established including the influence of medical and social interventions. METHODS: Individuals thought to be drug injectors were identified through a single primary medical care facility in Edinburgh between 1980 and 2006 and flagged with the General Registry Office. From October 2005 - October 2007, these cases were traced and invited to undergo interview assessment covering early life experience, substance use, health and social histories. Age and sex matched controls for confirmed cases (alive and dead) were later recruited through the same health facility. Controls for living cases completed the same structured interview schedule. Data were also collected on cases and controls through linkage to routine primary care records, death registrations, hospital contact statistics and police and prison records. All interviews were conducted with the knowledge and permission of the current GP. RESULTS: The initial cohort size was 814. At start of follow up 227 had died. Of the remaining 587: 20 had no contact details and 5 had embarked from the UK; 40 declined participation; 38 did not respond to invitations; 14 were excluded by their GP on health or social grounds and 22 had their contact details withheld by administrative authorities. 448 were interviewed of whom 16 denied injection and were excluded. Of 191 dead cases with medical records 4 were excluded as their records contained no evidence of injection. 5 interviewed cases died before follow up was concluded though these individuals were counted as "live" cases. 1 control per case (dead and alive) was recruited. Linkage to Scottish Morbidity Records data (available from 1981 onwards) on general acute inpatient and day cases, mental health inpatient and day cases and cancer was provided by Information Services, NHS Scotland, for all cases interviewed and all dead cases. The Scottish Prison Service provided records for 198 (46%) of cases interviewed, 48 cases not interviewed and 34 (18%) of dead cases. For a sub-sample of 100 interviewees a search of the Lothian and Borders police database was made for official criminal records and 94 had criminal records. Data linkage for controls is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting drug users recruited from a community setting can be successfully followed-up through interviews and record linkage. Information from injecting cases is being analysed in terms of injecting patterns and possible influences on these. Comparisons between cases and controls will allow identification of possibly modifiable early life risk factors for drug injection and will also clarify the burden of disease associated with injection and the influence on this of different health and social interventions. BioMed Central 2010-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2841670/ /pubmed/20187928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-101 Text en Copyright ©2010 Macleod et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Macleod, John
Copeland, Lorraine
Hickman, Matthew
McKenzie, James
Kimber, Jo
De Angelis, Daniela
Robertson, James R
The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
title The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
title_full The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
title_fullStr The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
title_full_unstemmed The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
title_short The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
title_sort edinburgh addiction cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20187928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-101
work_keys_str_mv AT macleodjohn theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT copelandlorraine theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT hickmanmatthew theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT mckenziejames theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT kimberjo theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT deangelisdaniela theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT robertsonjamesr theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT macleodjohn edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT copelandlorraine edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT hickmanmatthew edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT mckenziejames edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT kimberjo edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT deangelisdaniela edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols
AT robertsonjamesr edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols