Cargando…
The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls
BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is an important public health problem. Epidemiological understanding of this problem is incomplete as longitudinal studies in the general population are difficult to undertake. In particular little is known about early life risk factors for later drug injection or abou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20187928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-101 |
_version_ | 1782179151313108992 |
---|---|
author | Macleod, John Copeland, Lorraine Hickman, Matthew McKenzie, James Kimber, Jo De Angelis, Daniela Robertson, James R |
author_facet | Macleod, John Copeland, Lorraine Hickman, Matthew McKenzie, James Kimber, Jo De Angelis, Daniela Robertson, James R |
author_sort | Macleod, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is an important public health problem. Epidemiological understanding of this problem is incomplete as longitudinal studies in the general population are difficult to undertake. In particular little is known about early life risk factors for later drug injection or about the life course of injection once established including the influence of medical and social interventions. METHODS: Individuals thought to be drug injectors were identified through a single primary medical care facility in Edinburgh between 1980 and 2006 and flagged with the General Registry Office. From October 2005 - October 2007, these cases were traced and invited to undergo interview assessment covering early life experience, substance use, health and social histories. Age and sex matched controls for confirmed cases (alive and dead) were later recruited through the same health facility. Controls for living cases completed the same structured interview schedule. Data were also collected on cases and controls through linkage to routine primary care records, death registrations, hospital contact statistics and police and prison records. All interviews were conducted with the knowledge and permission of the current GP. RESULTS: The initial cohort size was 814. At start of follow up 227 had died. Of the remaining 587: 20 had no contact details and 5 had embarked from the UK; 40 declined participation; 38 did not respond to invitations; 14 were excluded by their GP on health or social grounds and 22 had their contact details withheld by administrative authorities. 448 were interviewed of whom 16 denied injection and were excluded. Of 191 dead cases with medical records 4 were excluded as their records contained no evidence of injection. 5 interviewed cases died before follow up was concluded though these individuals were counted as "live" cases. 1 control per case (dead and alive) was recruited. Linkage to Scottish Morbidity Records data (available from 1981 onwards) on general acute inpatient and day cases, mental health inpatient and day cases and cancer was provided by Information Services, NHS Scotland, for all cases interviewed and all dead cases. The Scottish Prison Service provided records for 198 (46%) of cases interviewed, 48 cases not interviewed and 34 (18%) of dead cases. For a sub-sample of 100 interviewees a search of the Lothian and Borders police database was made for official criminal records and 94 had criminal records. Data linkage for controls is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting drug users recruited from a community setting can be successfully followed-up through interviews and record linkage. Information from injecting cases is being analysed in terms of injecting patterns and possible influences on these. Comparisons between cases and controls will allow identification of possibly modifiable early life risk factors for drug injection and will also clarify the burden of disease associated with injection and the influence on this of different health and social interventions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2841670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28416702010-03-19 The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls Macleod, John Copeland, Lorraine Hickman, Matthew McKenzie, James Kimber, Jo De Angelis, Daniela Robertson, James R BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: Injection drug use is an important public health problem. Epidemiological understanding of this problem is incomplete as longitudinal studies in the general population are difficult to undertake. In particular little is known about early life risk factors for later drug injection or about the life course of injection once established including the influence of medical and social interventions. METHODS: Individuals thought to be drug injectors were identified through a single primary medical care facility in Edinburgh between 1980 and 2006 and flagged with the General Registry Office. From October 2005 - October 2007, these cases were traced and invited to undergo interview assessment covering early life experience, substance use, health and social histories. Age and sex matched controls for confirmed cases (alive and dead) were later recruited through the same health facility. Controls for living cases completed the same structured interview schedule. Data were also collected on cases and controls through linkage to routine primary care records, death registrations, hospital contact statistics and police and prison records. All interviews were conducted with the knowledge and permission of the current GP. RESULTS: The initial cohort size was 814. At start of follow up 227 had died. Of the remaining 587: 20 had no contact details and 5 had embarked from the UK; 40 declined participation; 38 did not respond to invitations; 14 were excluded by their GP on health or social grounds and 22 had their contact details withheld by administrative authorities. 448 were interviewed of whom 16 denied injection and were excluded. Of 191 dead cases with medical records 4 were excluded as their records contained no evidence of injection. 5 interviewed cases died before follow up was concluded though these individuals were counted as "live" cases. 1 control per case (dead and alive) was recruited. Linkage to Scottish Morbidity Records data (available from 1981 onwards) on general acute inpatient and day cases, mental health inpatient and day cases and cancer was provided by Information Services, NHS Scotland, for all cases interviewed and all dead cases. The Scottish Prison Service provided records for 198 (46%) of cases interviewed, 48 cases not interviewed and 34 (18%) of dead cases. For a sub-sample of 100 interviewees a search of the Lothian and Borders police database was made for official criminal records and 94 had criminal records. Data linkage for controls is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting drug users recruited from a community setting can be successfully followed-up through interviews and record linkage. Information from injecting cases is being analysed in terms of injecting patterns and possible influences on these. Comparisons between cases and controls will allow identification of possibly modifiable early life risk factors for drug injection and will also clarify the burden of disease associated with injection and the influence on this of different health and social interventions. BioMed Central 2010-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2841670/ /pubmed/20187928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-101 Text en Copyright ©2010 Macleod et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Macleod, John Copeland, Lorraine Hickman, Matthew McKenzie, James Kimber, Jo De Angelis, Daniela Robertson, James R The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
title | The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
title_full | The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
title_fullStr | The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
title_full_unstemmed | The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
title_short | The Edinburgh Addiction Cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
title_sort | edinburgh addiction cohort: recruitment and follow-up of a primary care based sample of injection drug users and non drug-injecting controls |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20187928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macleodjohn theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT copelandlorraine theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT hickmanmatthew theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT mckenziejames theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT kimberjo theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT deangelisdaniela theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT robertsonjamesr theedinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT macleodjohn edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT copelandlorraine edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT hickmanmatthew edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT mckenziejames edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT kimberjo edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT deangelisdaniela edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols AT robertsonjamesr edinburghaddictioncohortrecruitmentandfollowupofaprimarycarebasedsampleofinjectiondrugusersandnondruginjectingcontrols |