Cargando…
Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
[Image: see text] Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2010
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20151694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900293a |
_version_ | 1782179169728200704 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Buyong Tsai, Chung-Jung Pan, Yongping Nussinov, Ruth |
author_facet | Ma, Buyong Tsai, Chung-Jung Pan, Yongping Nussinov, Ruth |
author_sort | Ma, Buyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to transcription factors binding to genomic DNA and to protein interaction domains binding to their partners. Here, we explain that both can be understood in terms of allostery and the cellular (or in vitro) environment. The idea is simple yet powerful; it emphasizes the role of allostery in defining whether binding between transcription factors and (cognate or noncognate) DNA sequences will lead to function and to the type of function. Allosteric effects are the outcome of dynamically shifting populations; thus binding to even slightly different DNA sequences will lead to different transcription factor conformations that can be reflected in the binding sites to their co-regulators. Currently, allostery is not considered when trying to understand how binding phenomena determine the functional outcome. Allosteric effects can enhance the binding specificity in a function-oriented manner. Here we provide a biological rationale that considers cellular crowding effects. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2842019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28420192010-03-19 Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? Ma, Buyong Tsai, Chung-Jung Pan, Yongping Nussinov, Ruth ACS Chem Biol [Image: see text] Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to transcription factors binding to genomic DNA and to protein interaction domains binding to their partners. Here, we explain that both can be understood in terms of allostery and the cellular (or in vitro) environment. The idea is simple yet powerful; it emphasizes the role of allostery in defining whether binding between transcription factors and (cognate or noncognate) DNA sequences will lead to function and to the type of function. Allosteric effects are the outcome of dynamically shifting populations; thus binding to even slightly different DNA sequences will lead to different transcription factor conformations that can be reflected in the binding sites to their co-regulators. Currently, allostery is not considered when trying to understand how binding phenomena determine the functional outcome. Allosteric effects can enhance the binding specificity in a function-oriented manner. Here we provide a biological rationale that considers cellular crowding effects. American Chemical Society 2010-02-12 2010-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2842019/ /pubmed/20151694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900293a Text en Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org. |
spellingShingle | Ma, Buyong Tsai, Chung-Jung Pan, Yongping Nussinov, Ruth Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? |
title | Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? |
title_full | Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? |
title_fullStr | Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? |
title_short | Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? |
title_sort | why does binding of proteins to dna or proteins to proteins not necessarily spell function? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20151694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900293a |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mabuyong whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction AT tsaichungjung whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction AT panyongping whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction AT nussinovruth whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction |