Cargando…

Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?

[Image: see text] Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Buyong, Tsai, Chung-Jung, Pan, Yongping, Nussinov, Ruth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2010
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20151694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900293a
_version_ 1782179169728200704
author Ma, Buyong
Tsai, Chung-Jung
Pan, Yongping
Nussinov, Ruth
author_facet Ma, Buyong
Tsai, Chung-Jung
Pan, Yongping
Nussinov, Ruth
author_sort Ma, Buyong
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to transcription factors binding to genomic DNA and to protein interaction domains binding to their partners. Here, we explain that both can be understood in terms of allostery and the cellular (or in vitro) environment. The idea is simple yet powerful; it emphasizes the role of allostery in defining whether binding between transcription factors and (cognate or noncognate) DNA sequences will lead to function and to the type of function. Allosteric effects are the outcome of dynamically shifting populations; thus binding to even slightly different DNA sequences will lead to different transcription factor conformations that can be reflected in the binding sites to their co-regulators. Currently, allostery is not considered when trying to understand how binding phenomena determine the functional outcome. Allosteric effects can enhance the binding specificity in a function-oriented manner. Here we provide a biological rationale that considers cellular crowding effects.
format Text
id pubmed-2842019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28420192010-03-19 Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function? Ma, Buyong Tsai, Chung-Jung Pan, Yongping Nussinov, Ruth ACS Chem Biol [Image: see text] Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to transcription factors binding to genomic DNA and to protein interaction domains binding to their partners. Here, we explain that both can be understood in terms of allostery and the cellular (or in vitro) environment. The idea is simple yet powerful; it emphasizes the role of allostery in defining whether binding between transcription factors and (cognate or noncognate) DNA sequences will lead to function and to the type of function. Allosteric effects are the outcome of dynamically shifting populations; thus binding to even slightly different DNA sequences will lead to different transcription factor conformations that can be reflected in the binding sites to their co-regulators. Currently, allostery is not considered when trying to understand how binding phenomena determine the functional outcome. Allosteric effects can enhance the binding specificity in a function-oriented manner. Here we provide a biological rationale that considers cellular crowding effects. American Chemical Society 2010-02-12 2010-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2842019/ /pubmed/20151694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900293a Text en Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Ma, Buyong
Tsai, Chung-Jung
Pan, Yongping
Nussinov, Ruth
Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
title Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
title_full Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
title_fullStr Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
title_full_unstemmed Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
title_short Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?
title_sort why does binding of proteins to dna or proteins to proteins not necessarily spell function?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20151694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900293a
work_keys_str_mv AT mabuyong whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction
AT tsaichungjung whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction
AT panyongping whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction
AT nussinovruth whydoesbindingofproteinstodnaorproteinstoproteinsnotnecessarilyspellfunction