Cargando…

The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition worldwide. Clinical guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain recommend first-line treatment consisting of advice, reassurance and simple analgesics. Exercise is also commonly prescribed to these patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Machado, Luciana AC, Maher, Chris G, Herbert, Rob D, Clare, Helen, McAuley, James H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20102596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-10
_version_ 1782179176171700224
author Machado, Luciana AC
Maher, Chris G
Herbert, Rob D
Clare, Helen
McAuley, James H
author_facet Machado, Luciana AC
Maher, Chris G
Herbert, Rob D
Clare, Helen
McAuley, James H
author_sort Machado, Luciana AC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition worldwide. Clinical guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain recommend first-line treatment consisting of advice, reassurance and simple analgesics. Exercise is also commonly prescribed to these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of adding the McKenzie method to the first-line care of patients with acute low back pain. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up was conducted between September 2005 and June 2008. Patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain from primary care medical practices were screened. Eligible participants were assigned to receive a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method and first-line care (advice, reassurance and time-contingent acetaminophen) or first-line care alone, for 3 weeks. Primary outcome measures included pain (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) over the first seven days, pain at 1 week, pain at 3 weeks and global perceived effect (-5 to 5 scale) at 3 weeks. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight participants were randomized into study groups, of whom 138 (93%) completed the last follow-up. The addition of the McKenzie method to first-line care produced statistically significant but small reductions in pain when compared to first-line care alone: mean of -0.4 points (95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -0.1) at 1 week, -0.7 points (95% confidence interval, -1.2 to -0.1) at 3 weeks, and -0.3 points (95% confidence interval, -0.5 to -0.0) over the first 7 days. Patients receiving the McKenzie method did not show additional effects on global perceived effect, disability, function or on the risk of persistent symptoms. These patients sought less additional health care than those receiving only first-line care (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: When added to the currently recommended first-line care of acute low back pain, a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method does not produce appreciable additional short-term improvements in pain, disability, function or global perceived effect. However, the McKenzie method seems to reduce health utilization although it does not reduce patient's risk of developing persistent symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12605000032651
format Text
id pubmed-2842230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28422302010-03-20 The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Machado, Luciana AC Maher, Chris G Herbert, Rob D Clare, Helen McAuley, James H BMC Med Research article BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition worldwide. Clinical guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain recommend first-line treatment consisting of advice, reassurance and simple analgesics. Exercise is also commonly prescribed to these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of adding the McKenzie method to the first-line care of patients with acute low back pain. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up was conducted between September 2005 and June 2008. Patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain from primary care medical practices were screened. Eligible participants were assigned to receive a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method and first-line care (advice, reassurance and time-contingent acetaminophen) or first-line care alone, for 3 weeks. Primary outcome measures included pain (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) over the first seven days, pain at 1 week, pain at 3 weeks and global perceived effect (-5 to 5 scale) at 3 weeks. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight participants were randomized into study groups, of whom 138 (93%) completed the last follow-up. The addition of the McKenzie method to first-line care produced statistically significant but small reductions in pain when compared to first-line care alone: mean of -0.4 points (95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -0.1) at 1 week, -0.7 points (95% confidence interval, -1.2 to -0.1) at 3 weeks, and -0.3 points (95% confidence interval, -0.5 to -0.0) over the first 7 days. Patients receiving the McKenzie method did not show additional effects on global perceived effect, disability, function or on the risk of persistent symptoms. These patients sought less additional health care than those receiving only first-line care (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: When added to the currently recommended first-line care of acute low back pain, a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method does not produce appreciable additional short-term improvements in pain, disability, function or global perceived effect. However, the McKenzie method seems to reduce health utilization although it does not reduce patient's risk of developing persistent symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12605000032651 BioMed Central 2010-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2842230/ /pubmed/20102596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-10 Text en Copyright ©2010 Machado et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Machado, Luciana AC
Maher, Chris G
Herbert, Rob D
Clare, Helen
McAuley, James H
The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of the mckenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20102596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-10
work_keys_str_mv AT machadolucianaac theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maherchrisg theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herbertrobd theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarehelen theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcauleyjamesh theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT machadolucianaac effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maherchrisg effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herbertrobd effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarehelen effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcauleyjamesh effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial