Cargando…
The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition worldwide. Clinical guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain recommend first-line treatment consisting of advice, reassurance and simple analgesics. Exercise is also commonly prescribed to these patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20102596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-10 |
_version_ | 1782179176171700224 |
---|---|
author | Machado, Luciana AC Maher, Chris G Herbert, Rob D Clare, Helen McAuley, James H |
author_facet | Machado, Luciana AC Maher, Chris G Herbert, Rob D Clare, Helen McAuley, James H |
author_sort | Machado, Luciana AC |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition worldwide. Clinical guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain recommend first-line treatment consisting of advice, reassurance and simple analgesics. Exercise is also commonly prescribed to these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of adding the McKenzie method to the first-line care of patients with acute low back pain. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up was conducted between September 2005 and June 2008. Patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain from primary care medical practices were screened. Eligible participants were assigned to receive a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method and first-line care (advice, reassurance and time-contingent acetaminophen) or first-line care alone, for 3 weeks. Primary outcome measures included pain (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) over the first seven days, pain at 1 week, pain at 3 weeks and global perceived effect (-5 to 5 scale) at 3 weeks. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight participants were randomized into study groups, of whom 138 (93%) completed the last follow-up. The addition of the McKenzie method to first-line care produced statistically significant but small reductions in pain when compared to first-line care alone: mean of -0.4 points (95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -0.1) at 1 week, -0.7 points (95% confidence interval, -1.2 to -0.1) at 3 weeks, and -0.3 points (95% confidence interval, -0.5 to -0.0) over the first 7 days. Patients receiving the McKenzie method did not show additional effects on global perceived effect, disability, function or on the risk of persistent symptoms. These patients sought less additional health care than those receiving only first-line care (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: When added to the currently recommended first-line care of acute low back pain, a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method does not produce appreciable additional short-term improvements in pain, disability, function or global perceived effect. However, the McKenzie method seems to reduce health utilization although it does not reduce patient's risk of developing persistent symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12605000032651 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2842230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28422302010-03-20 The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Machado, Luciana AC Maher, Chris G Herbert, Rob D Clare, Helen McAuley, James H BMC Med Research article BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition worldwide. Clinical guidelines for the management of patients with acute low back pain recommend first-line treatment consisting of advice, reassurance and simple analgesics. Exercise is also commonly prescribed to these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of adding the McKenzie method to the first-line care of patients with acute low back pain. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up was conducted between September 2005 and June 2008. Patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain from primary care medical practices were screened. Eligible participants were assigned to receive a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method and first-line care (advice, reassurance and time-contingent acetaminophen) or first-line care alone, for 3 weeks. Primary outcome measures included pain (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) over the first seven days, pain at 1 week, pain at 3 weeks and global perceived effect (-5 to 5 scale) at 3 weeks. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight participants were randomized into study groups, of whom 138 (93%) completed the last follow-up. The addition of the McKenzie method to first-line care produced statistically significant but small reductions in pain when compared to first-line care alone: mean of -0.4 points (95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -0.1) at 1 week, -0.7 points (95% confidence interval, -1.2 to -0.1) at 3 weeks, and -0.3 points (95% confidence interval, -0.5 to -0.0) over the first 7 days. Patients receiving the McKenzie method did not show additional effects on global perceived effect, disability, function or on the risk of persistent symptoms. These patients sought less additional health care than those receiving only first-line care (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: When added to the currently recommended first-line care of acute low back pain, a treatment programme based on the McKenzie method does not produce appreciable additional short-term improvements in pain, disability, function or global perceived effect. However, the McKenzie method seems to reduce health utilization although it does not reduce patient's risk of developing persistent symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12605000032651 BioMed Central 2010-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2842230/ /pubmed/20102596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-10 Text en Copyright ©2010 Machado et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Machado, Luciana AC Maher, Chris G Herbert, Rob D Clare, Helen McAuley, James H The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of the mckenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20102596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT machadolucianaac theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maherchrisg theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT herbertrobd theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT clarehelen theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcauleyjamesh theeffectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT machadolucianaac effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maherchrisg effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT herbertrobd effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT clarehelen effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcauleyjamesh effectivenessofthemckenziemethodinadditiontofirstlinecareforacutelowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial |