Cargando…
Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process
BACKGROUND: Adding, omitting or changing outcomes after a systematic review protocol is published can result in bias because it increases the potential for unacknowledged or post hoc revisions of the planned analyses. The main objective of this study was to look for discrepancies between primary out...
Autores principales: | Kirkham, Jamie J., Altman, Doug G., Williamson, Paula R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20339557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009810 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
por: Saini, Pooja, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2008)