Cargando…

Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study

AIM: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegde, Mithra N, Hegde, Priyadarshini, Shetty, Veena, Sampath, Pavitra B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351972
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.48838
_version_ 1782179229590355968
author Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Priyadarshini
Shetty, Veena
Sampath, Pavitra B
author_facet Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Priyadarshini
Shetty, Veena
Sampath, Pavitra B
author_sort Hegde, Mithra N
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper SE Plus, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy One on Streptococcus mutans after aging the samples in phosphate-buffered saline for one, seven, and fourteen days. Statistical analysis included the one-way Anova and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Among the tested materials, Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited an antibacterial effect for seven days when in contact with S. mutans. None of the adhesive systems exhibited any antibacterial effect after 14 days. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of antibacterial agents into dentine-bonding agents may become an essential factor in inhibiting residual bacteria in the cavity following a cavity disinfection procedure, and it could be recommended in situations where total disinfection of cavity is not accomplished due to lack of accessibility.
format Text
id pubmed-2843535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28435352010-03-26 Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Shetty, Veena Sampath, Pavitra B J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper SE Plus, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy One on Streptococcus mutans after aging the samples in phosphate-buffered saline for one, seven, and fourteen days. Statistical analysis included the one-way Anova and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Among the tested materials, Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited an antibacterial effect for seven days when in contact with S. mutans. None of the adhesive systems exhibited any antibacterial effect after 14 days. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of antibacterial agents into dentine-bonding agents may become an essential factor in inhibiting residual bacteria in the cavity following a cavity disinfection procedure, and it could be recommended in situations where total disinfection of cavity is not accomplished due to lack of accessibility. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2843535/ /pubmed/20351972 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.48838 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hegde, Mithra N
Hegde, Priyadarshini
Shetty, Veena
Sampath, Pavitra B
Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
title Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
title_full Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
title_short Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
title_sort assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351972
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.48838
work_keys_str_mv AT hegdemithran assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT hegdepriyadarshini assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT shettyveena assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT sampathpavitrab assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy