Cargando…
Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study
AIM: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351972 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.48838 |
_version_ | 1782179229590355968 |
---|---|
author | Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Shetty, Veena Sampath, Pavitra B |
author_facet | Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Shetty, Veena Sampath, Pavitra B |
author_sort | Hegde, Mithra N |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper SE Plus, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy One on Streptococcus mutans after aging the samples in phosphate-buffered saline for one, seven, and fourteen days. Statistical analysis included the one-way Anova and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Among the tested materials, Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited an antibacterial effect for seven days when in contact with S. mutans. None of the adhesive systems exhibited any antibacterial effect after 14 days. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of antibacterial agents into dentine-bonding agents may become an essential factor in inhibiting residual bacteria in the cavity following a cavity disinfection procedure, and it could be recommended in situations where total disinfection of cavity is not accomplished due to lack of accessibility. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2843535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28435352010-03-26 Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Shetty, Veena Sampath, Pavitra B J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: To evaluate and compare the antibacterial activity of polymerized, two-step, self-etching and one-step, self-etching adhesive systems by using the direct contact test after one, seven, and fourteen days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The direct contact test was used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper SE Plus, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy One on Streptococcus mutans after aging the samples in phosphate-buffered saline for one, seven, and fourteen days. Statistical analysis included the one-way Anova and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Among the tested materials, Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited an antibacterial effect for seven days when in contact with S. mutans. None of the adhesive systems exhibited any antibacterial effect after 14 days. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of antibacterial agents into dentine-bonding agents may become an essential factor in inhibiting residual bacteria in the cavity following a cavity disinfection procedure, and it could be recommended in situations where total disinfection of cavity is not accomplished due to lack of accessibility. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2843535/ /pubmed/20351972 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.48838 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hegde, Mithra N Hegde, Priyadarshini Shetty, Veena Sampath, Pavitra B Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study |
title | Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study |
title_full | Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study |
title_short | Assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study |
title_sort | assessment of antibacterial activity of self-etching dental adhesive systems: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351972 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.48838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegdemithran assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy AT hegdepriyadarshini assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy AT shettyveena assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy AT sampathpavitrab assessmentofantibacterialactivityofselfetchingdentaladhesivesystemsaninvitrostudy |