Cargando…

The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale

BACKGROUND: Today, many organizations have adopted some kind of empowerment initiative for at least part of their workforce. Over the last two decades, two complementary perspectives on empowerment at work have emerged: structural and psychological empowerment. Psychological empowerment is a motivat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uner, Sarp, Turan, Sevgi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20214770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-117
_version_ 1782179247282978816
author Uner, Sarp
Turan, Sevgi
author_facet Uner, Sarp
Turan, Sevgi
author_sort Uner, Sarp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Today, many organizations have adopted some kind of empowerment initiative for at least part of their workforce. Over the last two decades, two complementary perspectives on empowerment at work have emerged: structural and psychological empowerment. Psychological empowerment is a motivational construct manifested in four cognitions: meaning, competence, self-determination and impact. The aim of this article is to examine the construct validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale in a culturally diverse environment. METHODS: The scale contains four dimensions over 12 statements. Data were gathered from 260 nurses and 161 physicians. The dimensionality of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analyses. To investigate the multidimensional nature of the empowerment construct and the validity of the scale, first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Furthermore, Cronbach alpha coefficients were assessed to investigate reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analyses revealed that four factors in both solutions. The first- and second-order factor analysis indicated an acceptable fit between the data and the theoretical model for nurses and physicians. Cronbach alpha coefficients varied between 0.81-0.94 for both groups, which may be considered satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses indicated that the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the scale can be considered satisfactory.
format Text
id pubmed-2843662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28436622010-03-23 The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale Uner, Sarp Turan, Sevgi BMC Public Health Research article BACKGROUND: Today, many organizations have adopted some kind of empowerment initiative for at least part of their workforce. Over the last two decades, two complementary perspectives on empowerment at work have emerged: structural and psychological empowerment. Psychological empowerment is a motivational construct manifested in four cognitions: meaning, competence, self-determination and impact. The aim of this article is to examine the construct validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale in a culturally diverse environment. METHODS: The scale contains four dimensions over 12 statements. Data were gathered from 260 nurses and 161 physicians. The dimensionality of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analyses. To investigate the multidimensional nature of the empowerment construct and the validity of the scale, first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Furthermore, Cronbach alpha coefficients were assessed to investigate reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analyses revealed that four factors in both solutions. The first- and second-order factor analysis indicated an acceptable fit between the data and the theoretical model for nurses and physicians. Cronbach alpha coefficients varied between 0.81-0.94 for both groups, which may be considered satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses indicated that the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the scale can be considered satisfactory. BioMed Central 2010-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2843662/ /pubmed/20214770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-117 Text en Copyright ©2010 Uner and Turan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Uner, Sarp
Turan, Sevgi
The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
title The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
title_full The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
title_fullStr The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
title_full_unstemmed The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
title_short The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
title_sort construct validity and reliability of the turkish version of spreitzer's psychological empowerment scale
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2843662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20214770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-117
work_keys_str_mv AT unersarp theconstructvalidityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofspreitzerspsychologicalempowermentscale
AT turansevgi theconstructvalidityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofspreitzerspsychologicalempowermentscale
AT unersarp constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofspreitzerspsychologicalempowermentscale
AT turansevgi constructvalidityandreliabilityoftheturkishversionofspreitzerspsychologicalempowermentscale