Cargando…

Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance

BACKGROUND: Plant biologists have long speculated about the mechanisms that guide pollen tubes to ovules. Although there is now evidence that ovules emit a diffusible attractant, little is known about how this attractant mediates interactions between the pollen tube and the ovules. RESULTS: We emplo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stewman, Shannon F, Jones-Rhoades, Matthew, Bhimalapuram, Prabhakar, Tchernookov, Martin, Preuss, Daphne, Dinner, Aaron R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20170550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-32
_version_ 1782179279700754432
author Stewman, Shannon F
Jones-Rhoades, Matthew
Bhimalapuram, Prabhakar
Tchernookov, Martin
Preuss, Daphne
Dinner, Aaron R
author_facet Stewman, Shannon F
Jones-Rhoades, Matthew
Bhimalapuram, Prabhakar
Tchernookov, Martin
Preuss, Daphne
Dinner, Aaron R
author_sort Stewman, Shannon F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plant biologists have long speculated about the mechanisms that guide pollen tubes to ovules. Although there is now evidence that ovules emit a diffusible attractant, little is known about how this attractant mediates interactions between the pollen tube and the ovules. RESULTS: We employ a semi-in vitro assay, in which ovules dissected from Arabidopsis thaliana are arranged around a cut style on artificial medium, to elucidate how ovules release the attractant and how pollen tubes respond to it. Analysis of microscopy images of the semi-in vitro system shows that pollen tubes are more attracted to ovules that are incubated on the medium for longer times before pollen tubes emerge from the cut style. The responses of tubes are consistent with their sensing a gradient of an attractant at 100-150 μm, farther than previously reported. Our microscopy images also show that pollen tubes slow their growth near the micropyles of functional ovules with a spatial range that depends on ovule incubation time. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a stochastic model that captures these dynamics. In the model, a pollen tube senses a difference in the fraction of receptors bound to an attractant and changes its direction of growth in response; the attractant is continuously released from ovules and spreads isotropically on the medium. The model suggests that the observed slowing greatly enhances the ability of pollen tubes to successfully target ovules. The relation of the results to guidance in vivo is discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2844068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28440682010-03-24 Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance Stewman, Shannon F Jones-Rhoades, Matthew Bhimalapuram, Prabhakar Tchernookov, Martin Preuss, Daphne Dinner, Aaron R BMC Plant Biol Research article BACKGROUND: Plant biologists have long speculated about the mechanisms that guide pollen tubes to ovules. Although there is now evidence that ovules emit a diffusible attractant, little is known about how this attractant mediates interactions between the pollen tube and the ovules. RESULTS: We employ a semi-in vitro assay, in which ovules dissected from Arabidopsis thaliana are arranged around a cut style on artificial medium, to elucidate how ovules release the attractant and how pollen tubes respond to it. Analysis of microscopy images of the semi-in vitro system shows that pollen tubes are more attracted to ovules that are incubated on the medium for longer times before pollen tubes emerge from the cut style. The responses of tubes are consistent with their sensing a gradient of an attractant at 100-150 μm, farther than previously reported. Our microscopy images also show that pollen tubes slow their growth near the micropyles of functional ovules with a spatial range that depends on ovule incubation time. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a stochastic model that captures these dynamics. In the model, a pollen tube senses a difference in the fraction of receptors bound to an attractant and changes its direction of growth in response; the attractant is continuously released from ovules and spreads isotropically on the medium. The model suggests that the observed slowing greatly enhances the ability of pollen tubes to successfully target ovules. The relation of the results to guidance in vivo is discussed. BioMed Central 2010-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2844068/ /pubmed/20170550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-32 Text en Copyright ©2010 Stewman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Stewman, Shannon F
Jones-Rhoades, Matthew
Bhimalapuram, Prabhakar
Tchernookov, Martin
Preuss, Daphne
Dinner, Aaron R
Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
title Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
title_full Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
title_fullStr Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
title_short Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
title_sort mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20170550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-32
work_keys_str_mv AT stewmanshannonf mechanisticinsightsfromaquantitativeanalysisofpollentubeguidance
AT jonesrhoadesmatthew mechanisticinsightsfromaquantitativeanalysisofpollentubeguidance
AT bhimalapuramprabhakar mechanisticinsightsfromaquantitativeanalysisofpollentubeguidance
AT tchernookovmartin mechanisticinsightsfromaquantitativeanalysisofpollentubeguidance
AT preussdaphne mechanisticinsightsfromaquantitativeanalysisofpollentubeguidance
AT dinneraaronr mechanisticinsightsfromaquantitativeanalysisofpollentubeguidance