Cargando…

Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?

Plant-associated micro-organisms such as mycotoxin-producing endophytes commonly have direct negative effects on herbivores. These effects may be carried over to natural enemies of the herbivores, but this has been rarely explored. We examined how feeding on Neotyphodium endophyte infected (E+) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saari, Susanna, Sundell, Janne, Huitu, Otso, Helander, Marjo, Ketoja, Elise, Ylönen, Hannu, Saikkonen, Kari
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20352096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009845
_version_ 1782179307036082176
author Saari, Susanna
Sundell, Janne
Huitu, Otso
Helander, Marjo
Ketoja, Elise
Ylönen, Hannu
Saikkonen, Kari
author_facet Saari, Susanna
Sundell, Janne
Huitu, Otso
Helander, Marjo
Ketoja, Elise
Ylönen, Hannu
Saikkonen, Kari
author_sort Saari, Susanna
collection PubMed
description Plant-associated micro-organisms such as mycotoxin-producing endophytes commonly have direct negative effects on herbivores. These effects may be carried over to natural enemies of the herbivores, but this has been rarely explored. We examined how feeding on Neotyphodium endophyte infected (E+) and endophyte free (E−) meadow ryegrass (Scherodonus pratensis) affects body mass, population size and mobility of sibling voles (Microtus levis), and whether the diet mediates the vulnerability of voles to least weasel (Mustela nivalis nivalis) predation. Because least weasels are known to be olfactory hunters, we also examined whether they are able to distinguish olfactory cues of voles fed on E+ and E− diets. Neither body mass of voles nor population size differed between diets. However, contrary to our prediction, least weasels preyed more often on voles fed with E− grass than on voles fed with E+ grass. The mobility of voles fed on E+ grass was reduced compared to voles fed on E− grass, but this effect was unrelated to risk of predation. Least weasels appeared unable to distinguish between excrement odours of voles between the two treatments. Our results suggest that consumption of endophytic grass is not directly deleterious to sibling voles. What's more, consumption of endophytes appears to be advantageous to voles by reducing risk of mammalian predation. Our study is thus the first to demonstrate an effect of plant-associated microbial symbionts on herbivore-predator interactions in vertebrate communities.
format Text
id pubmed-2844419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28444192010-03-27 Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators? Saari, Susanna Sundell, Janne Huitu, Otso Helander, Marjo Ketoja, Elise Ylönen, Hannu Saikkonen, Kari PLoS One Research Article Plant-associated micro-organisms such as mycotoxin-producing endophytes commonly have direct negative effects on herbivores. These effects may be carried over to natural enemies of the herbivores, but this has been rarely explored. We examined how feeding on Neotyphodium endophyte infected (E+) and endophyte free (E−) meadow ryegrass (Scherodonus pratensis) affects body mass, population size and mobility of sibling voles (Microtus levis), and whether the diet mediates the vulnerability of voles to least weasel (Mustela nivalis nivalis) predation. Because least weasels are known to be olfactory hunters, we also examined whether they are able to distinguish olfactory cues of voles fed on E+ and E− diets. Neither body mass of voles nor population size differed between diets. However, contrary to our prediction, least weasels preyed more often on voles fed with E− grass than on voles fed with E+ grass. The mobility of voles fed on E+ grass was reduced compared to voles fed on E− grass, but this effect was unrelated to risk of predation. Least weasels appeared unable to distinguish between excrement odours of voles between the two treatments. Our results suggest that consumption of endophytic grass is not directly deleterious to sibling voles. What's more, consumption of endophytes appears to be advantageous to voles by reducing risk of mammalian predation. Our study is thus the first to demonstrate an effect of plant-associated microbial symbionts on herbivore-predator interactions in vertebrate communities. Public Library of Science 2010-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2844419/ /pubmed/20352096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009845 Text en Saari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saari, Susanna
Sundell, Janne
Huitu, Otso
Helander, Marjo
Ketoja, Elise
Ylönen, Hannu
Saikkonen, Kari
Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?
title Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?
title_full Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?
title_fullStr Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?
title_full_unstemmed Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?
title_short Fungal-Mediated Multitrophic Interactions - Do Grass Endophytes in Diet Protect Voles from Predators?
title_sort fungal-mediated multitrophic interactions - do grass endophytes in diet protect voles from predators?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20352096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009845
work_keys_str_mv AT saarisusanna fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators
AT sundelljanne fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators
AT huituotso fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators
AT helandermarjo fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators
AT ketojaelise fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators
AT ylonenhannu fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators
AT saikkonenkari fungalmediatedmultitrophicinteractionsdograssendophytesindietprotectvolesfrompredators