Cargando…
On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma
PURPOSE: The added value of baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans in therapy evaluation in malignant lymphoma is unclear. In guidelines, baseline PET is recommended but not mandatory except in lymphoma types with variable fluoro-d-glucose uptake. The aim of the present study was to test...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-009-0259-3 |
_version_ | 1782179313511038976 |
---|---|
author | Quarles van Ufford, Henriette Hoekstra, Otto de Haas, Marie Fijnheer, Rob Wittebol, Shulamiet Tieks, Bianca Kramer, Mark de Klerk, John |
author_facet | Quarles van Ufford, Henriette Hoekstra, Otto de Haas, Marie Fijnheer, Rob Wittebol, Shulamiet Tieks, Bianca Kramer, Mark de Klerk, John |
author_sort | Quarles van Ufford, Henriette |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The added value of baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans in therapy evaluation in malignant lymphoma is unclear. In guidelines, baseline PET is recommended but not mandatory except in lymphoma types with variable fluoro-d-glucose uptake. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that adding baseline PET information decreases false positive readings with posttreatment PET and improves observer agreement. METHODS: Forty-four patients (mean age 56 years, standard deviation 14) with malignant lymphoma were included. Two nuclear medicine physicians retrospectively and independently evaluated the posttreatment PET, 3 weeks later followed by paired reading of baseline and posttreatment PET. For each PET, 22 regions were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal, resulting in an overall PET score of positive, unclear, or negative. In case of discrepancies, consensus was reached. RESULTS: Addition of baseline to posttreatment PET evaluation affected the classification of metabolic response in 34% of malignant lymphoma patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. In one out of seven patients, addition of the baseline PET lead to opposite conclusions (95% confidence interval 4–14). False positivity was reduced by adding the baseline scan information, but the effect on false negativity was similar. In addition, the amount of unclear classifications halved after paired reading. Observer agreement did not improve upon adding the baseline PET data. CONCLUSION: Without any other clinical information, pretreatment PET facilitates changes the interpretation of a posttreatment PET in a third of the patients, resulting in both upgrading and downgrading of the posttreatment situation of a malignant lymphoma patient. If these results are confirmed for PET–computed tomography systems, they favor the addition of baseline PET to the current work-up of patients with malignant lymphoma. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2844531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28445312010-03-26 On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma Quarles van Ufford, Henriette Hoekstra, Otto de Haas, Marie Fijnheer, Rob Wittebol, Shulamiet Tieks, Bianca Kramer, Mark de Klerk, John Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: The added value of baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans in therapy evaluation in malignant lymphoma is unclear. In guidelines, baseline PET is recommended but not mandatory except in lymphoma types with variable fluoro-d-glucose uptake. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that adding baseline PET information decreases false positive readings with posttreatment PET and improves observer agreement. METHODS: Forty-four patients (mean age 56 years, standard deviation 14) with malignant lymphoma were included. Two nuclear medicine physicians retrospectively and independently evaluated the posttreatment PET, 3 weeks later followed by paired reading of baseline and posttreatment PET. For each PET, 22 regions were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal, resulting in an overall PET score of positive, unclear, or negative. In case of discrepancies, consensus was reached. RESULTS: Addition of baseline to posttreatment PET evaluation affected the classification of metabolic response in 34% of malignant lymphoma patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. In one out of seven patients, addition of the baseline PET lead to opposite conclusions (95% confidence interval 4–14). False positivity was reduced by adding the baseline scan information, but the effect on false negativity was similar. In addition, the amount of unclear classifications halved after paired reading. Observer agreement did not improve upon adding the baseline PET data. CONCLUSION: Without any other clinical information, pretreatment PET facilitates changes the interpretation of a posttreatment PET in a third of the patients, resulting in both upgrading and downgrading of the posttreatment situation of a malignant lymphoma patient. If these results are confirmed for PET–computed tomography systems, they favor the addition of baseline PET to the current work-up of patients with malignant lymphoma. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-07 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2844531/ /pubmed/19809855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-009-0259-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Quarles van Ufford, Henriette Hoekstra, Otto de Haas, Marie Fijnheer, Rob Wittebol, Shulamiet Tieks, Bianca Kramer, Mark de Klerk, John On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma |
title | On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma |
title_full | On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma |
title_fullStr | On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma |
title_short | On the Added Value of Baseline FDG-PET in Malignant Lymphoma |
title_sort | on the added value of baseline fdg-pet in malignant lymphoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-009-0259-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quarlesvanuffordhenriette ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT hoekstraotto ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT dehaasmarie ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT fijnheerrob ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT wittebolshulamiet ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT tieksbianca ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT kramermark ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma AT deklerkjohn ontheaddedvalueofbaselinefdgpetinmalignantlymphoma |