Cargando…

Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study

Objective To determine whether the previously observed 25% reduction in breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen following the introduction of mammography screening was indeed due to screening, by using an additional screening region and five years additional follow-up. Design We used Poisson regressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, Zahl, Per-Henrik, Gøtzsche, Peter C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20332505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1241
_version_ 1782179342988607488
author Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl
Zahl, Per-Henrik
Gøtzsche, Peter C
author_facet Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl
Zahl, Per-Henrik
Gøtzsche, Peter C
author_sort Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether the previously observed 25% reduction in breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen following the introduction of mammography screening was indeed due to screening, by using an additional screening region and five years additional follow-up. Design We used Poisson regression analyses adjusted for changes in age distribution to compare the annual percentage change in breast cancer mortality in areas where screening was used with the change in areas where it was not used during 10 years before screening was introduced and for 10 years after screening was in practice (starting five years after introduction of screening). Setting Copenhagen, where mammography screening started in 1991, and Funen county, where screening was introduced in 1993. The rest of Denmark (about 80% of the population) served as an unscreened control group. Participants All Danish women recorded in the Cause of Death Register and Statistics Denmark for 1971-2006. Main outcome measure Annual percentage change in breast cancer mortality in regions offering mammography screening and those not offering screening. Results In women who could benefit from screening (ages 55-74 years), we found a mortality decline of 1% per year in the screening areas (relative risk (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.01) during the 10 year period when screening could have had an effect (1997-2006). In women of the same age in the non-screening areas, there was a decline of 2% in mortality per year (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) in the same 10 year period. In women who were too young to benefit from screening (ages 35-55 years), breast cancer mortality during 1997-2006 declined 5% per year (RR 0.95, CI 0.92 to 0.98) in the screened areas and 6% per year (RR 0.94, CI 0.92 to 0.95) in the non-screened areas. For the older age groups (75-84 years), there was little change in breast cancer mortality over time in both screened and non-screened areas. Trends were less clear during the 10 year period before screening was introduced, with a possible increase in mortality in women aged less than 75 years in the non-screened regions. Conclusions We were unable to find an effect of the Danish screening programme on breast cancer mortality. The reductions in breast cancer mortality we observed in screening regions were similar or less than those in non-screened areas and in age groups too young to benefit from screening, and are more likely explained by changes in risk factors and improved treatment than by screening mammography.
format Text
id pubmed-2844939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28449392010-04-14 Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl Zahl, Per-Henrik Gøtzsche, Peter C BMJ Research Objective To determine whether the previously observed 25% reduction in breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen following the introduction of mammography screening was indeed due to screening, by using an additional screening region and five years additional follow-up. Design We used Poisson regression analyses adjusted for changes in age distribution to compare the annual percentage change in breast cancer mortality in areas where screening was used with the change in areas where it was not used during 10 years before screening was introduced and for 10 years after screening was in practice (starting five years after introduction of screening). Setting Copenhagen, where mammography screening started in 1991, and Funen county, where screening was introduced in 1993. The rest of Denmark (about 80% of the population) served as an unscreened control group. Participants All Danish women recorded in the Cause of Death Register and Statistics Denmark for 1971-2006. Main outcome measure Annual percentage change in breast cancer mortality in regions offering mammography screening and those not offering screening. Results In women who could benefit from screening (ages 55-74 years), we found a mortality decline of 1% per year in the screening areas (relative risk (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.01) during the 10 year period when screening could have had an effect (1997-2006). In women of the same age in the non-screening areas, there was a decline of 2% in mortality per year (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) in the same 10 year period. In women who were too young to benefit from screening (ages 35-55 years), breast cancer mortality during 1997-2006 declined 5% per year (RR 0.95, CI 0.92 to 0.98) in the screened areas and 6% per year (RR 0.94, CI 0.92 to 0.95) in the non-screened areas. For the older age groups (75-84 years), there was little change in breast cancer mortality over time in both screened and non-screened areas. Trends were less clear during the 10 year period before screening was introduced, with a possible increase in mortality in women aged less than 75 years in the non-screened regions. Conclusions We were unable to find an effect of the Danish screening programme on breast cancer mortality. The reductions in breast cancer mortality we observed in screening regions were similar or less than those in non-screened areas and in age groups too young to benefit from screening, and are more likely explained by changes in risk factors and improved treatment than by screening mammography. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2844939/ /pubmed/20332505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1241 Text en © Jørgensen et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl
Zahl, Per-Henrik
Gøtzsche, Peter C
Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study
title Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study
title_full Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study
title_fullStr Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study
title_short Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study
title_sort breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in denmark: comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2844939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20332505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1241
work_keys_str_mv AT jørgensenkarstenjuhl breastcancermortalityinorganisedmammographyscreeningindenmarkcomparativestudy
AT zahlperhenrik breastcancermortalityinorganisedmammographyscreeningindenmarkcomparativestudy
AT gøtzschepeterc breastcancermortalityinorganisedmammographyscreeningindenmarkcomparativestudy