Cargando…
SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements
Contemporary high dimensional biological assays, such as mRNA expression microarrays, regularly involve multiple data processing steps, such as experimental processing, computational processing, sample selection, or feature selection (i.e. gene selection), prior to deriving any biological conclusion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2845619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20360852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009905 |
_version_ | 1782179420663971840 |
---|---|
author | Cabanski, Christopher R. Qi, Yuan Yin, Xiaoying Bair, Eric Hayward, Michele C. Fan, Cheng Li, Jianying Wilkerson, Matthew D. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Hayes, D. Neil |
author_facet | Cabanski, Christopher R. Qi, Yuan Yin, Xiaoying Bair, Eric Hayward, Michele C. Fan, Cheng Li, Jianying Wilkerson, Matthew D. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Hayes, D. Neil |
author_sort | Cabanski, Christopher R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contemporary high dimensional biological assays, such as mRNA expression microarrays, regularly involve multiple data processing steps, such as experimental processing, computational processing, sample selection, or feature selection (i.e. gene selection), prior to deriving any biological conclusions. These steps can dramatically change the interpretation of an experiment. Evaluation of processing steps has received limited attention in the literature. It is not straightforward to evaluate different processing methods and investigators are often unsure of the best method. We present a simple statistical tool, Standardized WithIn class Sum of Squares (SWISS), that allows investigators to compare alternate data processing methods, such as different experimental methods, normalizations, or technologies, on a dataset in terms of how well they cluster a priori biological classes. SWISS uses Euclidean distance to determine which method does a better job of clustering the data elements based on a priori classifications. We apply SWISS to three different gene expression applications. The first application uses four different datasets to compare different experimental methods, normalizations, and gene sets. The second application, using data from the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, compares different microarray platforms. The third application compares different technologies: a single Agilent two-color microarray versus one lane of RNA-Seq. These applications give an indication of the variety of problems that SWISS can be helpful in solving. The SWISS analysis of one-color versus two-color microarrays provides investigators who use two-color arrays the opportunity to review their results in light of a single-channel analysis, with all of the associated benefits offered by this design. Analysis of the MACQ data shows differential intersite reproducibility by array platform. SWISS also shows that one lane of RNA-Seq clusters data by biological phenotypes as well as a single Agilent two-color microarray. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2845619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28456192010-04-02 SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements Cabanski, Christopher R. Qi, Yuan Yin, Xiaoying Bair, Eric Hayward, Michele C. Fan, Cheng Li, Jianying Wilkerson, Matthew D. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Hayes, D. Neil PLoS One Research Article Contemporary high dimensional biological assays, such as mRNA expression microarrays, regularly involve multiple data processing steps, such as experimental processing, computational processing, sample selection, or feature selection (i.e. gene selection), prior to deriving any biological conclusions. These steps can dramatically change the interpretation of an experiment. Evaluation of processing steps has received limited attention in the literature. It is not straightforward to evaluate different processing methods and investigators are often unsure of the best method. We present a simple statistical tool, Standardized WithIn class Sum of Squares (SWISS), that allows investigators to compare alternate data processing methods, such as different experimental methods, normalizations, or technologies, on a dataset in terms of how well they cluster a priori biological classes. SWISS uses Euclidean distance to determine which method does a better job of clustering the data elements based on a priori classifications. We apply SWISS to three different gene expression applications. The first application uses four different datasets to compare different experimental methods, normalizations, and gene sets. The second application, using data from the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, compares different microarray platforms. The third application compares different technologies: a single Agilent two-color microarray versus one lane of RNA-Seq. These applications give an indication of the variety of problems that SWISS can be helpful in solving. The SWISS analysis of one-color versus two-color microarrays provides investigators who use two-color arrays the opportunity to review their results in light of a single-channel analysis, with all of the associated benefits offered by this design. Analysis of the MACQ data shows differential intersite reproducibility by array platform. SWISS also shows that one lane of RNA-Seq clusters data by biological phenotypes as well as a single Agilent two-color microarray. Public Library of Science 2010-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2845619/ /pubmed/20360852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009905 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cabanski, Christopher R. Qi, Yuan Yin, Xiaoying Bair, Eric Hayward, Michele C. Fan, Cheng Li, Jianying Wilkerson, Matthew D. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Hayes, D. Neil SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements |
title | SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements |
title_full | SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements |
title_fullStr | SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements |
title_full_unstemmed | SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements |
title_short | SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to Evaluate Methodologies and Dataset Elements |
title_sort | swiss made: standardized within class sum of squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2845619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20360852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cabanskichristopherr swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT qiyuan swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT yinxiaoying swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT baireric swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT haywardmichelec swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT fancheng swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT lijianying swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT wilkersonmatthewd swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT marronjs swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT peroucharlesm swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT hayesdneil swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements |