Cargando…

Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival

Background The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) uses estimates of the effects of interventions on cause-specific child mortality as a basis for generating projections of child lives that could be saved by increasing coverage of effective interventions. Estimates of intervention effects are an essential eleme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Neff, Fischer-Walker, Christa, Bryce, Jennifer, Bahl, Rajiv, Cousens, Simon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2845875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20348122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq036
_version_ 1782179450959429632
author Walker, Neff
Fischer-Walker, Christa
Bryce, Jennifer
Bahl, Rajiv
Cousens, Simon
author_facet Walker, Neff
Fischer-Walker, Christa
Bryce, Jennifer
Bahl, Rajiv
Cousens, Simon
author_sort Walker, Neff
collection PubMed
description Background The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) uses estimates of the effects of interventions on cause-specific child mortality as a basis for generating projections of child lives that could be saved by increasing coverage of effective interventions. Estimates of intervention effects are an essential element of LiST, and need to reflect the best available scientific evidence. This article describes the guidelines developed by the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) that are applied by scientists conducting reviews of intervention effects for use in LiST. Methods The guidelines build on and extend those developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Working Group for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). They reflect the experience gained by the CHERG intervention review groups in conducting the reviews published in this volume, and will continue to be refined through future reviews. Presentation of the guidelines Expected products and guidelines are described for six steps in the CHERG intervention review process: (i) defining the scope of the review; (ii) conducting the literature search; (iii) extracting information from individual studies; (iv) assessing and summarizing the evidence; (v) translating the evidence into estimates of intervention effects and (vi) presenting the results. Conclusions The CHERG intervention reviews represent an ambitious effort to summarize existing evidence and use it as the basis for supporting sound public health decision making through LiST. These efforts will continue, and a similar process is now under way to assess intervention effects for reducing maternal mortality.
format Text
id pubmed-2845875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28458752010-03-29 Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival Walker, Neff Fischer-Walker, Christa Bryce, Jennifer Bahl, Rajiv Cousens, Simon Int J Epidemiol Articles Background The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) uses estimates of the effects of interventions on cause-specific child mortality as a basis for generating projections of child lives that could be saved by increasing coverage of effective interventions. Estimates of intervention effects are an essential element of LiST, and need to reflect the best available scientific evidence. This article describes the guidelines developed by the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) that are applied by scientists conducting reviews of intervention effects for use in LiST. Methods The guidelines build on and extend those developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Working Group for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). They reflect the experience gained by the CHERG intervention review groups in conducting the reviews published in this volume, and will continue to be refined through future reviews. Presentation of the guidelines Expected products and guidelines are described for six steps in the CHERG intervention review process: (i) defining the scope of the review; (ii) conducting the literature search; (iii) extracting information from individual studies; (iv) assessing and summarizing the evidence; (v) translating the evidence into estimates of intervention effects and (vi) presenting the results. Conclusions The CHERG intervention reviews represent an ambitious effort to summarize existing evidence and use it as the basis for supporting sound public health decision making through LiST. These efforts will continue, and a similar process is now under way to assess intervention effects for reducing maternal mortality. Oxford University Press 2010-04 2010-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2845875/ /pubmed/20348122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq036 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association © The Author 2010; all rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Walker, Neff
Fischer-Walker, Christa
Bryce, Jennifer
Bahl, Rajiv
Cousens, Simon
Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival
title Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival
title_full Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival
title_fullStr Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival
title_full_unstemmed Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival
title_short Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival
title_sort standards for cherg reviews of intervention effects on child survival
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2845875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20348122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq036
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerneff standardsforchergreviewsofinterventioneffectsonchildsurvival
AT fischerwalkerchrista standardsforchergreviewsofinterventioneffectsonchildsurvival
AT brycejennifer standardsforchergreviewsofinterventioneffectsonchildsurvival
AT bahlrajiv standardsforchergreviewsofinterventioneffectsonchildsurvival
AT cousenssimon standardsforchergreviewsofinterventioneffectsonchildsurvival
AT standardsforchergreviewsofinterventioneffectsonchildsurvival