Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy and colectomy are commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite evidence demonstrating advantages with the minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach, open procedures occur with greater prevalence. Therefore, there is still controversy as to whether the MIS approach is saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fullum, Terrence M., Ladapo, Joseph A., Borah, Bijan J., Gunnarsson, Candace L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2846276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19730950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0675-0
_version_ 1782179465963503616
author Fullum, Terrence M.
Ladapo, Joseph A.
Borah, Bijan J.
Gunnarsson, Candace L.
author_facet Fullum, Terrence M.
Ladapo, Joseph A.
Borah, Bijan J.
Gunnarsson, Candace L.
author_sort Fullum, Terrence M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appendectomy and colectomy are commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite evidence demonstrating advantages with the minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach, open procedures occur with greater prevalence. Therefore, there is still controversy as to whether the MIS approach is safer or more cost effective. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using a large commercial payer database. The data included information on 7,532 appendectomies and 2,745 colectomies. Data on the distribution of patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics associated with the MIS and open approaches were reviewed. The corresponding complication rates and expenditures were analyzed. Summary statistics were compared using chi-square tests, and generalized linear models were constructed to estimate expenditures while controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: The patients undergoing MIS and open colectomy showed no significant variations in age distribution or marginal age differences for appendectomy. Significantly more patients experienced an infection postoperatively, and procedure-specific complications were more common in the open group for both procedures (P < 0.05). The postsurgical hospital stay was longer for the patients treated using the open techniques, differing an average of half a day for appendectomies and significantly more (4 days) for colectomy (P < 0.05). Readmission rates differed little between the two approaches. Procedures performed through an MIS approach were associated with lower expenditures than for the open technique, with differences ranging from $700 for appendectomy patients (P < 0.05) to $15,200 for colectomy patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy were associated with lower infection rates, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower expenditures than open surgery.
format Text
id pubmed-2846276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28462762010-04-05 Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database Fullum, Terrence M. Ladapo, Joseph A. Borah, Bijan J. Gunnarsson, Candace L. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Appendectomy and colectomy are commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite evidence demonstrating advantages with the minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach, open procedures occur with greater prevalence. Therefore, there is still controversy as to whether the MIS approach is safer or more cost effective. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using a large commercial payer database. The data included information on 7,532 appendectomies and 2,745 colectomies. Data on the distribution of patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics associated with the MIS and open approaches were reviewed. The corresponding complication rates and expenditures were analyzed. Summary statistics were compared using chi-square tests, and generalized linear models were constructed to estimate expenditures while controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: The patients undergoing MIS and open colectomy showed no significant variations in age distribution or marginal age differences for appendectomy. Significantly more patients experienced an infection postoperatively, and procedure-specific complications were more common in the open group for both procedures (P < 0.05). The postsurgical hospital stay was longer for the patients treated using the open techniques, differing an average of half a day for appendectomies and significantly more (4 days) for colectomy (P < 0.05). Readmission rates differed little between the two approaches. Procedures performed through an MIS approach were associated with lower expenditures than for the open technique, with differences ranging from $700 for appendectomy patients (P < 0.05) to $15,200 for colectomy patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy were associated with lower infection rates, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower expenditures than open surgery. Springer-Verlag 2009-09-03 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2846276/ /pubmed/19730950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0675-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Fullum, Terrence M.
Ladapo, Joseph A.
Borah, Bijan J.
Gunnarsson, Candace L.
Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
title Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
title_full Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
title_short Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
title_sort comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2846276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19730950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0675-0
work_keys_str_mv AT fullumterrencem comparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicoutcomesbetweenopenandminimallyinvasiveappendectomyandcolectomyevidencefromalargecommercialpayerdatabase
AT ladapojosepha comparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicoutcomesbetweenopenandminimallyinvasiveappendectomyandcolectomyevidencefromalargecommercialpayerdatabase
AT borahbijanj comparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicoutcomesbetweenopenandminimallyinvasiveappendectomyandcolectomyevidencefromalargecommercialpayerdatabase
AT gunnarssoncandacel comparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicoutcomesbetweenopenandminimallyinvasiveappendectomyandcolectomyevidencefromalargecommercialpayerdatabase